All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Sharma, Shashank" <shashank.sharma@amd.com>
To: "Somalapuram, Amaranath" <asomalap@amd.com>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	"Somalapuram Amaranath" <Amaranath.Somalapuram@amd.com>,
	amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: alexander.deucher@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/amdgpu: add debugfs for reset registers list
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 15:31:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48646543-ac47-bfc1-ee09-54c22fd5ac6c@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e92cd376-2cf3-f7ed-3dee-a39f0f5c7cbc@amd.com>

 >> User only update the list of reg offsets on init, there is no
 >> predefined reg offset from kernel code.

I missed this comment in the last patch, and this makes me a bit 
confused. During the design phase, did we agree to have this whole list 
loaded from user ? which means that if user doesn't define the list at 
init, we will not send the trace_event().

Or was it kernel has a list, and user can modify if he wants to, and we 
will dump the values as per the register list.

@Christian ?

Regards
Shashank
On 2/8/2022 3:18 PM, Sharma, Shashank wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2/8/2022 2:39 PM, Somalapuram, Amaranath wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2/8/2022 4:43 PM, Sharma, Shashank wrote:
>>> I thought we spoke and agreed about:
>>> - Not doing dynamic memory allocation during a reset call,
>> as there is a redesign debugfs call will happen during the application 
>> initialization and not during reset.
>>> - Not doing string operations, but just dumping register values by 
>>> index.
>> I think your referring to the second patch which happens during reset 
>> and no string operation in second patch.
> 
> Pls see my comment in the end.
> 
>>> NACK !
>>>
>>> - Shashank
>>>
>>> Amar,
>>> Apart from the long comment,there are a few more bugs in the patch, 
>>> which I have mentioned here inline. Please check them out.
>>>
>>> - Shashank
>>>
>>> On 2/8/2022 9:18 AM, Christian König wrote:
>>>> Am 08.02.22 um 09:16 schrieb Somalapuram Amaranath:
>>>>> List of register to be populated for dump collection during the GPU 
>>>>> reset.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Somalapuram Amaranath <Amaranath.Somalapuram@amd.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h         |  3 ++
>>>>>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_debugfs.c | 60 
>>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>   2 files changed, 63 insertions(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h 
>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h
>>>>> index b85b67a88a3d..78fa46f959c5 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h
>>>>> @@ -1097,6 +1097,9 @@ struct amdgpu_device {
>>>>>       struct amdgpu_reset_control     *reset_cntl;
>>>>>       uint32_t ip_versions[HW_ID_MAX][HWIP_MAX_INSTANCE];
>>>>> +
>>>>> +    /* reset dump register */
>>>>> +    long            reset_dump_reg_list[128];
>>>>
>>>> I don't have time for a full review, but using long here certainly 
>>>> makes no sense.
>>>>
>>>> long is either 32bit or 64bit depending on the CPU architecture.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Christian.
>>>>
>> will change uint32_t.
>>>>>   };
>>>>>   static inline struct amdgpu_device *drm_to_adev(struct drm_device 
>>>>> *ddev)
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_debugfs.c 
>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_debugfs.c
>>>>> index 164d6a9e9fbb..dad268e8a81a 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_debugfs.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_debugfs.c
>>>>> @@ -1609,6 +1609,64 @@ DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(fops_ib_preempt, NULL,
>>>>>   DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(fops_sclk_set, NULL,
>>>>>               amdgpu_debugfs_sclk_set, "%llu\n");
>>>>> +static ssize_t amdgpu_reset_dump_register_list_read(struct file *f,
>>>>> +                char __user *buf, size_t size, loff_t *pos)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> +    struct amdgpu_device *adev = (struct amdgpu_device 
>>>>> *)file_inode(f)->i_private;
>>>>> +    char *reg_offset;
>>>>> +    int i, r, len;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +    reg_offset = kmalloc(2048, GFP_KERNEL);
> 
> We also want to understand how does the value 2048 came into picture, 
> probably a macro which calculates the size preprocessing time will work 
> better.
> 
> #define #define N_REGS_DUMP_GPU_RESET 10
> #define BUFFER_SZ(N_REGS_DUMP_GPU_RESET * (sizeof uint64_t) + 1)
> 
> This first macro can be used later for the loop count for registers as 
> well.
> 
>>>>> +    memset(reg_offset,  0, 2048);
>>>>> +    for (i = 0; adev->reset_dump_reg_list[i] != 0; i++)
>>>
>>> This loop termination condition is incorrect, why are we running the 
>>> loop until adev->reset_dump_reg_list[i] != 0 ?
>>>
>>> What if I have 10 registers to dump, but my 4th register value is 0 ? 
>>> It will break the loop at 4 and we will not get all values.
>>>
>> agreed, i try to avoid one more variable in adev
> 
> Not by the cost of logic of course :).
> 
> Now you can run this loop here.
> 
> for (i = 0; i < N_REGS...; i++) {
>      register_value_copy_here;
> }
> 
>>>>> +        sprintf(reg_offset + strlen(reg_offset), "0x%lx ", 
>>>>> adev->reset_dump_reg_list[i]);
>>>>> +
> 
>>>>> +    sprintf(reg_offset + strlen(reg_offset), "\n");
>>>>> +    len = strlen(reg_offset);
>>>>> +
>>>>> +    if (*pos >=  len)
>>>>> +        return 0;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +    r = copy_to_user(buf, reg_offset, len);
>>>>> +    *pos += len - r;
>>>>> +    kfree(reg_offset);
>>>
>>> Also, why are we doing a dynamic memory allocation for reg_offest ? 
>>> We can simply use adev->reset_dump_reg_list[i] isnt't it ?
>>>
>>> simply
>>> for (i=0; i<num_of_regs;i++) {
>>>     copy_to_user(buf, adev->reg_list[i], sizeof(uint64_t));
>>> }
>>>
>>> Or without even a loop, simply:
>>> copy_to_user(buf, &adev->reg_list, num_regs * sizeof(uint64_t));
>>>
>>> - Shashank
>>
>> it will not be in user readable format for debugfs, (if non readable 
>> is acceptable I will change this)
>>
> 
> We are just adding 0x in front of the reg value, so honestly I don't see 
> a huge improvement in the user readability, but if you still want to do 
> the dynamic allocation of memory, add the register offset or name as 
> well, I mean then it should read like:
> 
> 0x1234 = 0xABCD
> 0x1238 = 0xFFFF
> 
> - Shashank
> 
>>> +
>>>>>
>>>>> +    return len - r;
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>> +static ssize_t amdgpu_reset_dump_register_list_write(struct file 
>>>>> *f, const char __user *buf,
>>>>> +        size_t size, loff_t *pos)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> +    struct amdgpu_device *adev = (struct amdgpu_device 
>>>>> *)file_inode(f)->i_private;
>>>>> +    char *reg_offset, *reg;
>>>>> +    int ret, i = 0;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +    reg_offset = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
>>>>> +    memset(reg_offset,  0, size);
>>>>> +    ret = copy_from_user(reg_offset, buf, size);
>>>>> +
>>>
>>> We are not allowing user to write into the list, so this whole 
>>> function can just be a NOOP.
>>>
>>> - Shashank
>> User only update the list of reg offsets on init, there is no 
>> predefined reg offset from kernel code.
>>>
>>>>> +    if (ret)
>>>>> +        return -EFAULT;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +    while ((reg = strsep(&reg_offset, " ")) != NULL) {
>>>>> +        ret  = kstrtol(reg, 16, &adev->reset_dump_reg_list[i]);
>>>>> +        if (ret)
>>>>> +            return -EINVAL;
>>>>> +        i++;
>>>>> +    }
>>>>> +
>>>>> +    kfree(reg_offset);
>>>>> +
>>>>> +    return size;
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>> +static const struct file_operations 
>>>>> amdgpu_reset_dump_register_list = {
>>>>> +    .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>>>>> +    .read = amdgpu_reset_dump_register_list_read,
>>>>> +    .write = amdgpu_reset_dump_register_list_write,
>>>>> +    .llseek = default_llseek
>>>>> +};
>>>>> +
>>>>>   int amdgpu_debugfs_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>>>>>   {
>>>>>       struct dentry *root = adev_to_drm(adev)->primary->debugfs_root;
>>>>> @@ -1672,6 +1730,8 @@ int amdgpu_debugfs_init(struct amdgpu_device 
>>>>> *adev)
>>>>>                   &amdgpu_debugfs_test_ib_fops);
>>>>>       debugfs_create_file("amdgpu_vm_info", 0444, root, adev,
>>>>>                   &amdgpu_debugfs_vm_info_fops);
>>>>> +    debugfs_create_file("amdgpu_reset_dump_register_list", 0644, 
>>>>> root, adev,
>>>>> +                &amdgpu_reset_dump_register_list);
>>>>>       adev->debugfs_vbios_blob.data = adev->bios;
>>>>>       adev->debugfs_vbios_blob.size = adev->bios_size;
>>>>

  reply	other threads:[~2022-02-08 14:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-08  8:16 [PATCH 1/2] drm/amdgpu: add debugfs for reset registers list Somalapuram Amaranath
2022-02-08  8:16 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/amdgpu: add reset register trace function on GPU reset Somalapuram Amaranath
2022-02-08 15:28   ` Alex Deucher
2022-02-09  7:47     ` Christian König
2022-02-10  5:29       ` Somalapuram, Amaranath
2022-02-10  7:09         ` Christian König
2022-02-10  7:34           ` Somalapuram, Amaranath
2022-02-10  7:38             ` Christian König
2022-02-10 13:18               ` Sharma, Shashank
2022-02-10 14:05                 ` Christian König
2022-02-10 14:11                   ` Sharma, Shashank
2022-02-10 15:59                     ` Alex Deucher
2022-02-10 11:59         ` Sharma, Shashank
2022-02-10 12:27           ` Christian König
2022-02-08  8:18 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/amdgpu: add debugfs for reset registers list Christian König
2022-02-08 11:13   ` Sharma, Shashank
2022-02-08 13:39     ` Somalapuram, Amaranath
2022-02-08 14:18       ` Sharma, Shashank
2022-02-08 14:31         ` Sharma, Shashank [this message]
2022-02-08 14:51           ` Sharma, Shashank
2022-02-08 10:54 ` Sharma, Shashank

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=48646543-ac47-bfc1-ee09-54c22fd5ac6c@amd.com \
    --to=shashank.sharma@amd.com \
    --cc=Amaranath.Somalapuram@amd.com \
    --cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
    --cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=asomalap@amd.com \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.