All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@misterjones.org>
To: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH kernel] KVM: PPC: Make KVM_CAP_IRQFD_RESAMPLE platform dependent
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2022 10:00:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4884805567a0288ab1dbefb8aec819a2@misterjones.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <59dfb450-5a91-f27b-6edf-0adfa89729b7@ozlabs.ru>

On 2022-09-13 13:50, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> Ping? It's been a while and probably got lost :-/
> 
> On 18/05/2022 16:27, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> On 5/4/22 17:48, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>>> When introduced, IRQFD resampling worked on POWER8 with XICS. However
>>> KVM on POWER9 has never implemented it - the compatibility mode code
>>> ("XICS-on-XIVE") misses the kvm_notify_acked_irq() call and the 
>>> native
>>> XIVE mode does not handle INTx in KVM at all.
>>> 
>>> This moved the capability support advertising to platforms and stops
>>> advertising it on XIVE, i.e. POWER9 and later.
>>> 
>>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
>>> ---
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Or I could move this one together with KVM_CAP_IRQFD. Thoughts?
>> 
>> 
>> Ping?
>> 
>>> 
>>> ---
>>>   arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c       | 3 +++
>>>   arch/mips/kvm/mips.c       | 3 +++
>>>   arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c | 6 ++++++
>>>   arch/riscv/kvm/vm.c        | 3 +++
>>>   arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c   | 3 +++
>>>   arch/x86/kvm/x86.c         | 3 +++
>>>   virt/kvm/kvm_main.c        | 1 -
>>>   7 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>> 
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
>>> index 523bc934fe2f..092f0614bae3 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
>>> @@ -210,6 +210,9 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, 
>>> long ext)
>>>       case KVM_CAP_SET_GUEST_DEBUG:
>>>       case KVM_CAP_VCPU_ATTRIBUTES:
>>>       case KVM_CAP_PTP_KVM:
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQFD
>>> +    case KVM_CAP_IRQFD_RESAMPLE:
>>> +#endif

I don't mind moving this around, but I object to the #ifdefery.

This option is always selected on arm64, so it can safely be added
to the list without any condition.

Thanks,

         M.
-- 
Who you jivin' with that Cosmik Debris?
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@misterjones.org>
To: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
Cc: kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH kernel] KVM: PPC: Make KVM_CAP_IRQFD_RESAMPLE platform dependent
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2022 10:00:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4884805567a0288ab1dbefb8aec819a2@misterjones.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <59dfb450-5a91-f27b-6edf-0adfa89729b7@ozlabs.ru>

On 2022-09-13 13:50, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> Ping? It's been a while and probably got lost :-/
> 
> On 18/05/2022 16:27, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> On 5/4/22 17:48, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>>> When introduced, IRQFD resampling worked on POWER8 with XICS. However
>>> KVM on POWER9 has never implemented it - the compatibility mode code
>>> ("XICS-on-XIVE") misses the kvm_notify_acked_irq() call and the 
>>> native
>>> XIVE mode does not handle INTx in KVM at all.
>>> 
>>> This moved the capability support advertising to platforms and stops
>>> advertising it on XIVE, i.e. POWER9 and later.
>>> 
>>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
>>> ---
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Or I could move this one together with KVM_CAP_IRQFD. Thoughts?
>> 
>> 
>> Ping?
>> 
>>> 
>>> ---
>>>   arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c       | 3 +++
>>>   arch/mips/kvm/mips.c       | 3 +++
>>>   arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c | 6 ++++++
>>>   arch/riscv/kvm/vm.c        | 3 +++
>>>   arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c   | 3 +++
>>>   arch/x86/kvm/x86.c         | 3 +++
>>>   virt/kvm/kvm_main.c        | 1 -
>>>   7 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>> 
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
>>> index 523bc934fe2f..092f0614bae3 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
>>> @@ -210,6 +210,9 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, 
>>> long ext)
>>>       case KVM_CAP_SET_GUEST_DEBUG:
>>>       case KVM_CAP_VCPU_ATTRIBUTES:
>>>       case KVM_CAP_PTP_KVM:
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQFD
>>> +    case KVM_CAP_IRQFD_RESAMPLE:
>>> +#endif

I don't mind moving this around, but I object to the #ifdefery.

This option is always selected on arm64, so it can safely be added
to the list without any condition.

Thanks,

         M.
-- 
Who you jivin' with that Cosmik Debris?

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@misterjones.org>
To: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
Cc: kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH kernel] KVM: PPC: Make KVM_CAP_IRQFD_RESAMPLE platform dependent
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2022 10:00:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4884805567a0288ab1dbefb8aec819a2@misterjones.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <59dfb450-5a91-f27b-6edf-0adfa89729b7@ozlabs.ru>

On 2022-09-13 13:50, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> Ping? It's been a while and probably got lost :-/
> 
> On 18/05/2022 16:27, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> On 5/4/22 17:48, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>>> When introduced, IRQFD resampling worked on POWER8 with XICS. However
>>> KVM on POWER9 has never implemented it - the compatibility mode code
>>> ("XICS-on-XIVE") misses the kvm_notify_acked_irq() call and the 
>>> native
>>> XIVE mode does not handle INTx in KVM at all.
>>> 
>>> This moved the capability support advertising to platforms and stops
>>> advertising it on XIVE, i.e. POWER9 and later.
>>> 
>>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
>>> ---
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Or I could move this one together with KVM_CAP_IRQFD. Thoughts?
>> 
>> 
>> Ping?
>> 
>>> 
>>> ---
>>>   arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c       | 3 +++
>>>   arch/mips/kvm/mips.c       | 3 +++
>>>   arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c | 6 ++++++
>>>   arch/riscv/kvm/vm.c        | 3 +++
>>>   arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c   | 3 +++
>>>   arch/x86/kvm/x86.c         | 3 +++
>>>   virt/kvm/kvm_main.c        | 1 -
>>>   7 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>> 
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
>>> index 523bc934fe2f..092f0614bae3 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
>>> @@ -210,6 +210,9 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, 
>>> long ext)
>>>       case KVM_CAP_SET_GUEST_DEBUG:
>>>       case KVM_CAP_VCPU_ATTRIBUTES:
>>>       case KVM_CAP_PTP_KVM:
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQFD
>>> +    case KVM_CAP_IRQFD_RESAMPLE:
>>> +#endif

I don't mind moving this around, but I object to the #ifdefery.

This option is always selected on arm64, so it can safely be added
to the list without any condition.

Thanks,

         M.
-- 
Who you jivin' with that Cosmik Debris?

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@misterjones.org>
To: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
Cc: kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH kernel] KVM: PPC: Make KVM_CAP_IRQFD_RESAMPLE platform dependent
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2022 10:00:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4884805567a0288ab1dbefb8aec819a2@misterjones.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <59dfb450-5a91-f27b-6edf-0adfa89729b7@ozlabs.ru>

On 2022-09-13 13:50, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> Ping? It's been a while and probably got lost :-/
> 
> On 18/05/2022 16:27, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> On 5/4/22 17:48, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>>> When introduced, IRQFD resampling worked on POWER8 with XICS. However
>>> KVM on POWER9 has never implemented it - the compatibility mode code
>>> ("XICS-on-XIVE") misses the kvm_notify_acked_irq() call and the 
>>> native
>>> XIVE mode does not handle INTx in KVM at all.
>>> 
>>> This moved the capability support advertising to platforms and stops
>>> advertising it on XIVE, i.e. POWER9 and later.
>>> 
>>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
>>> ---
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Or I could move this one together with KVM_CAP_IRQFD. Thoughts?
>> 
>> 
>> Ping?
>> 
>>> 
>>> ---
>>>   arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c       | 3 +++
>>>   arch/mips/kvm/mips.c       | 3 +++
>>>   arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c | 6 ++++++
>>>   arch/riscv/kvm/vm.c        | 3 +++
>>>   arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c   | 3 +++
>>>   arch/x86/kvm/x86.c         | 3 +++
>>>   virt/kvm/kvm_main.c        | 1 -
>>>   7 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>> 
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
>>> index 523bc934fe2f..092f0614bae3 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
>>> @@ -210,6 +210,9 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, 
>>> long ext)
>>>       case KVM_CAP_SET_GUEST_DEBUG:
>>>       case KVM_CAP_VCPU_ATTRIBUTES:
>>>       case KVM_CAP_PTP_KVM:
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQFD
>>> +    case KVM_CAP_IRQFD_RESAMPLE:
>>> +#endif

I don't mind moving this around, but I object to the #ifdefery.

This option is always selected on arm64, so it can safely be added
to the list without any condition.

Thanks,

         M.
-- 
Who you jivin' with that Cosmik Debris?

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@misterjones.org>
To: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH kernel] KVM: PPC: Make KVM_CAP_IRQFD_RESAMPLE platform dependent
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2022 10:00:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4884805567a0288ab1dbefb8aec819a2@misterjones.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <59dfb450-5a91-f27b-6edf-0adfa89729b7@ozlabs.ru>

On 2022-09-13 13:50, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> Ping? It's been a while and probably got lost :-/
> 
> On 18/05/2022 16:27, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> On 5/4/22 17:48, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>>> When introduced, IRQFD resampling worked on POWER8 with XICS. However
>>> KVM on POWER9 has never implemented it - the compatibility mode code
>>> ("XICS-on-XIVE") misses the kvm_notify_acked_irq() call and the 
>>> native
>>> XIVE mode does not handle INTx in KVM at all.
>>> 
>>> This moved the capability support advertising to platforms and stops
>>> advertising it on XIVE, i.e. POWER9 and later.
>>> 
>>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
>>> ---
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Or I could move this one together with KVM_CAP_IRQFD. Thoughts?
>> 
>> 
>> Ping?
>> 
>>> 
>>> ---
>>>   arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c       | 3 +++
>>>   arch/mips/kvm/mips.c       | 3 +++
>>>   arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c | 6 ++++++
>>>   arch/riscv/kvm/vm.c        | 3 +++
>>>   arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c   | 3 +++
>>>   arch/x86/kvm/x86.c         | 3 +++
>>>   virt/kvm/kvm_main.c        | 1 -
>>>   7 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>> 
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
>>> index 523bc934fe2f..092f0614bae3 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
>>> @@ -210,6 +210,9 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, 
>>> long ext)
>>>       case KVM_CAP_SET_GUEST_DEBUG:
>>>       case KVM_CAP_VCPU_ATTRIBUTES:
>>>       case KVM_CAP_PTP_KVM:
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQFD
>>> +    case KVM_CAP_IRQFD_RESAMPLE:
>>> +#endif

I don't mind moving this around, but I object to the #ifdefery.

This option is always selected on arm64, so it can safely be added
to the list without any condition.

Thanks,

         M.
-- 
Who you jivin' with that Cosmik Debris?

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@misterjones.org>
To: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH kernel] KVM: PPC: Make KVM_CAP_IRQFD_RESAMPLE platform dependent
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2022 09:00:45 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4884805567a0288ab1dbefb8aec819a2@misterjones.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <59dfb450-5a91-f27b-6edf-0adfa89729b7@ozlabs.ru>

On 2022-09-13 13:50, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> Ping? It's been a while and probably got lost :-/
> 
> On 18/05/2022 16:27, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> On 5/4/22 17:48, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>>> When introduced, IRQFD resampling worked on POWER8 with XICS. However
>>> KVM on POWER9 has never implemented it - the compatibility mode code
>>> ("XICS-on-XIVE") misses the kvm_notify_acked_irq() call and the 
>>> native
>>> XIVE mode does not handle INTx in KVM at all.
>>> 
>>> This moved the capability support advertising to platforms and stops
>>> advertising it on XIVE, i.e. POWER9 and later.
>>> 
>>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
>>> ---
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Or I could move this one together with KVM_CAP_IRQFD. Thoughts?
>> 
>> 
>> Ping?
>> 
>>> 
>>> ---
>>>   arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c       | 3 +++
>>>   arch/mips/kvm/mips.c       | 3 +++
>>>   arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c | 6 ++++++
>>>   arch/riscv/kvm/vm.c        | 3 +++
>>>   arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c   | 3 +++
>>>   arch/x86/kvm/x86.c         | 3 +++
>>>   virt/kvm/kvm_main.c        | 1 -
>>>   7 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>> 
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
>>> index 523bc934fe2f..092f0614bae3 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
>>> @@ -210,6 +210,9 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, 
>>> long ext)
>>>       case KVM_CAP_SET_GUEST_DEBUG:
>>>       case KVM_CAP_VCPU_ATTRIBUTES:
>>>       case KVM_CAP_PTP_KVM:
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQFD
>>> +    case KVM_CAP_IRQFD_RESAMPLE:
>>> +#endif

I don't mind moving this around, but I object to the #ifdefery.

This option is always selected on arm64, so it can safely be added
to the list without any condition.

Thanks,

         M.
-- 
Who you jivin' with that Cosmik Debris?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-09-16  9:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-04  7:48 [PATCH kernel] KVM: PPC: Make KVM_CAP_IRQFD_RESAMPLE platform dependent Alexey Kardashevskiy
2022-05-04  7:48 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2022-05-04  7:48 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2022-05-04  7:48 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2022-05-04  7:48 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2022-05-04  7:48 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2022-05-18  6:27 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2022-05-18  6:27   ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2022-05-18  6:27   ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2022-05-18  6:27   ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2022-05-18  6:27   ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2022-05-18  6:27   ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2022-09-13 12:50   ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2022-09-13 12:50     ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2022-09-13 12:50     ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2022-09-13 12:50     ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2022-09-13 12:50     ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2022-09-13 12:50     ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2022-09-16  1:10     ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-09-16  1:10       ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-09-16  1:10       ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-09-16  1:10       ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-09-16  1:10       ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-09-16  9:00     ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2022-09-16  9:00       ` Marc Zyngier
2022-09-16  9:00       ` Marc Zyngier
2022-09-16  9:00       ` Marc Zyngier
2022-09-16  9:00       ` Marc Zyngier
2022-09-16  9:00       ` Marc Zyngier
2022-09-16  5:07 ` Anup Patel
2022-09-16  5:19   ` Anup Patel
2022-09-16  5:07   ` Anup Patel
2022-09-16  5:07   ` Anup Patel
2022-09-16  5:07   ` Anup Patel
2022-09-16  5:07   ` Anup Patel
2023-03-31 15:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-03-31 15:17   ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-03-31 15:17   ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-03-31 15:17   ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-03-31 15:17   ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4884805567a0288ab1dbefb8aec819a2@misterjones.org \
    --to=maz@misterjones.org \
    --cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=farosas@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.