All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>,
	Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	alpha <linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Parisc List <linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	Linux-sh list <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-m68k <linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org>,
	RTCLINUX <rtc-linux@googlegroups.com>,
	Linux-Arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] rtc: m68k: provide rtc_class_ops directly
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 10:34:19 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4888267.R0sXv0tuDQ@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdXS0JL_weLvjV4+i0ZPj=N+G6Vs1WDE9jffGUWehq5Xzg@mail.gmail.com>

On Wednesday 27 April 2016 09:47:56 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > --- a/arch/m68k/kernel/time.c
> > +++ b/arch/m68k/kernel/time.c
> > @@ -86,7 +86,24 @@ void read_persistent_clock(struct timespec *ts)
> >         }
> >  }
> >
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_USES_GETTIMEOFFSET
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_USES_GETTIMEOFFSET) && defined(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_GENERIC)
> 
> s/defined/IS_ENABLED/ for the modular case.

Thanks, fixed in all three architectures/

> > @@ -95,7 +112,10 @@ static int __init rtc_init(void)
> >         if (!mach_hwclk)
> >                 return -ENODEV;
> >
> > -       pdev = platform_device_register_simple("rtc-generic", -1, NULL, 0);
> > +       /* or just call devm_rtc_device_register instead? */
> 
> I guess this comment is a bogus leftover? There's no "dev" parameter to
> pass to devm_rtc_device_register() here.

Sort of. When I wrote it, I thought that a NULL argument would work,
and I later found out myself that it doesn't.

I'll drop the comment there, but there are still a few ways we (probably
not me, but whoever is interested) could take this further:

- register both the device and the driver here, and call
  devm_rtc_device_register from the probe function so we can move away
  from drivers/rtc/rtc-generic.c

- do this separately for mac, mvme147, mvme16x, sun3, q40 and sun3x

- move the six implementations into drivers/rtc as standalone drivers.

One (AFAIK) unsolved problem here is the question of how to handle
read_boot_clock/read_persistent_clock/update_persistent_clock in this
case. This is a really odd API that is implemented in various ways
on a few major architectures, and not at all on others, so it's all
highly inconsistent.

	Arnd

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>,
	Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	alpha <linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Parisc List <linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	Linux-sh list <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-m68k <linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org>,
	RTCLINUX <rtc-linux@googlegroups.com>,
	Linux-Arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] rtc: m68k: provide rtc_class_ops directly
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 12:34:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4888267.R0sXv0tuDQ@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdXS0JL_weLvjV4+i0ZPj=N+G6Vs1WDE9jffGUWehq5Xzg@mail.gmail.com>

On Wednesday 27 April 2016 09:47:56 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > --- a/arch/m68k/kernel/time.c
> > +++ b/arch/m68k/kernel/time.c
> > @@ -86,7 +86,24 @@ void read_persistent_clock(struct timespec *ts)
> >         }
> >  }
> >
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_USES_GETTIMEOFFSET
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_USES_GETTIMEOFFSET) && defined(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_GENERIC)
> 
> s/defined/IS_ENABLED/ for the modular case.

Thanks, fixed in all three architectures/

> > @@ -95,7 +112,10 @@ static int __init rtc_init(void)
> >         if (!mach_hwclk)
> >                 return -ENODEV;
> >
> > -       pdev = platform_device_register_simple("rtc-generic", -1, NULL, 0);
> > +       /* or just call devm_rtc_device_register instead? */
> 
> I guess this comment is a bogus leftover? There's no "dev" parameter to
> pass to devm_rtc_device_register() here.

Sort of. When I wrote it, I thought that a NULL argument would work,
and I later found out myself that it doesn't.

I'll drop the comment there, but there are still a few ways we (probably
not me, but whoever is interested) could take this further:

- register both the device and the driver here, and call
  devm_rtc_device_register from the probe function so we can move away
  from drivers/rtc/rtc-generic.c

- do this separately for mac, mvme147, mvme16x, sun3, q40 and sun3x

- move the six implementations into drivers/rtc as standalone drivers.

One (AFAIK) unsolved problem here is the question of how to handle
read_boot_clock/read_persistent_clock/update_persistent_clock in this
case. This is a really odd API that is implemented in various ways
on a few major architectures, and not at all on others, so it's all
highly inconsistent.

	Arnd

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>,
	Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	alpha <linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Parisc List <linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	Linux-sh list <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-m68k <linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org>,
	RTCLINUX <rtc-linux@googlegroups.com>,
	Linux-Arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] rtc: m68k: provide rtc_class_ops directly
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 12:34:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4888267.R0sXv0tuDQ@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdXS0JL_weLvjV4+i0ZPj=N+G6Vs1WDE9jffGUWehq5Xzg@mail.gmail.com>

On Wednesday 27 April 2016 09:47:56 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > --- a/arch/m68k/kernel/time.c
> > +++ b/arch/m68k/kernel/time.c
> > @@ -86,7 +86,24 @@ void read_persistent_clock(struct timespec *ts)
> >         }
> >  }
> >
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_USES_GETTIMEOFFSET
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_USES_GETTIMEOFFSET) && defined(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_GENERIC)
> 
> s/defined/IS_ENABLED/ for the modular case.

Thanks, fixed in all three architectures/

> > @@ -95,7 +112,10 @@ static int __init rtc_init(void)
> >         if (!mach_hwclk)
> >                 return -ENODEV;
> >
> > -       pdev = platform_device_register_simple("rtc-generic", -1, NULL, 0);
> > +       /* or just call devm_rtc_device_register instead? */
> 
> I guess this comment is a bogus leftover? There's no "dev" parameter to
> pass to devm_rtc_device_register() here.

Sort of. When I wrote it, I thought that a NULL argument would work,
and I later found out myself that it doesn't.

I'll drop the comment there, but there are still a few ways we (probably
not me, but whoever is interested) could take this further:

- register both the device and the driver here, and call
  devm_rtc_device_register from the probe function so we can move away
  from drivers/rtc/rtc-generic.c

- do this separately for mac, mvme147, mvme16x, sun3, q40 and sun3x

- move the six implementations into drivers/rtc as standalone drivers.

One (AFAIK) unsolved problem here is the question of how to handle
read_boot_clock/read_persistent_clock/update_persistent_clock in this
case. This is a really odd API that is implemented in various ways
on a few major architectures, and not at all on others, so it's all
highly inconsistent.

	Arnd

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>,
	Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	alpha <linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Parisc List <linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	Linux-sh list <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-m68k <linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org>,
	RTCLINUX <rtc-linux@googlegroups.com>,
	Linux-Arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] rtc: m68k: provide rtc_class_ops directly
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 12:34:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4888267.R0sXv0tuDQ@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdXS0JL_weLvjV4+i0ZPj=N+G6Vs1WDE9jffGUWehq5Xzg@mail.gmail.com>

On Wednesday 27 April 2016 09:47:56 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > --- a/arch/m68k/kernel/time.c
> > +++ b/arch/m68k/kernel/time.c
> > @@ -86,7 +86,24 @@ void read_persistent_clock(struct timespec *ts)
> >         }
> >  }
> >
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_USES_GETTIMEOFFSET
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_USES_GETTIMEOFFSET) && defined(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_GENERIC)
> 
> s/defined/IS_ENABLED/ for the modular case.

Thanks, fixed in all three architectures/

> > @@ -95,7 +112,10 @@ static int __init rtc_init(void)
> >         if (!mach_hwclk)
> >                 return -ENODEV;
> >
> > -       pdev = platform_device_register_simple("rtc-generic", -1, NULL, 0);
> > +       /* or just call devm_rtc_device_register instead? */
> 
> I guess this comment is a bogus leftover? There's no "dev" parameter to
> pass to devm_rtc_device_register() here.

Sort of. When I wrote it, I thought that a NULL argument would work,
and I later found out myself that it doesn't.

I'll drop the comment there, but there are still a few ways we (probably
not me, but whoever is interested) could take this further:

- register both the device and the driver here, and call
  devm_rtc_device_register from the probe function so we can move away
  from drivers/rtc/rtc-generic.c

- do this separately for mac, mvme147, mvme16x, sun3, q40 and sun3x

- move the six implementations into drivers/rtc as standalone drivers.

One (AFAIK) unsolved problem here is the question of how to handle
read_boot_clock/read_persistent_clock/update_persistent_clock in this
case. This is a really odd API that is implemented in various ways
on a few major architectures, and not at all on others, so it's all
highly inconsistent.

	Arnd

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to "rtc-linux".
Membership options at http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux .
Please read http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux/web/checklist
before submitting a driver.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rtc-linux" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rtc-linux+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-27 10:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-26 21:52 [PATCH v2 0/6] simplify rtc-generic driver Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-26 21:52 ` [rtc-linux] " Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-26 21:52 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-26 21:52 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-26 21:52 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] rtc: m68k: provide rtc_class_ops directly Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-26 21:52 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-26 21:52   ` [rtc-linux] " Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-26 21:52   ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-26 21:52   ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-27  7:47   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-04-27  7:47     ` [rtc-linux] " Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-04-27  7:47     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-04-27  7:47     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-04-27 10:34     ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2016-04-27 10:34       ` [rtc-linux] " Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-27 10:34       ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-27 10:34       ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-26 21:52 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] rtc: m68k: provide ioctl for q40 Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-26 21:52   ` [rtc-linux] " Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-26 21:52   ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-26 21:52   ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-26 21:52 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-26 21:52 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] rtc: powerpc: provide rtc_class_ops directly Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-26 21:52   ` [rtc-linux] " Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-26 21:52   ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-26 21:52   ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-26 21:52 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] rtc: parisc: " Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-26 21:52 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-26 21:52   ` [rtc-linux] " Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-26 21:52   ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-26 21:52   ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-27  0:22   ` kbuild test robot
2016-04-27  0:22     ` kbuild test robot
2016-04-27  0:22     ` kbuild test robot
2016-04-27  0:22     ` [rtc-linux] " kbuild test robot
2016-04-27  0:22     ` kbuild test robot
2016-04-27  0:22     ` kbuild test robot
2016-04-27 10:10     ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-27 10:10       ` [rtc-linux] " Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-27 10:10       ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-27 10:10       ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-26 21:52 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] rtc: sh: " Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-26 21:52   ` [rtc-linux] " Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-26 21:52   ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-26 21:52   ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-26 21:52 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] rtc: generic: remove get_rtc_time/set_rtc_time wrappers Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-26 21:52 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-26 21:52   ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-26 21:52   ` [rtc-linux] " Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-26 21:52   ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-26 21:52   ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-27  7:50 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] simplify rtc-generic driver Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-04-27  7:50   ` [rtc-linux] " Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-04-27  7:50   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-04-27  7:50   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-04-27  7:50 ` Geert Uytterhoeven

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4888267.R0sXv0tuDQ@wuerfel \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=dalias@libc.org \
    --cc=deller@gmx.de \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=rtc-linux@googlegroups.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.