All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tong Tiangen <tongtiangen@huawei.com>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	"Alexander Viro" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>,
	Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Guohanjun <guohanjun@huawei.com>,
	"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v4 1/7] x86, powerpc: fix function define in copy_mc_to_user
Date: Tue, 3 May 2022 09:06:18 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48f2779d-bc62-c7f5-c40e-7238a16b90fb@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <91011a66-b125-b445-1486-bada8e06b994@csgroup.eu>



在 2022/5/2 22:24, Christophe Leroy 写道:
> 
> 
> Le 20/04/2022 à 05:04, Tong Tiangen a écrit :
>> x86/powerpc has it's implementation of copy_mc_to_user but not use #define
>> to declare.
>>
>> This may cause problems, for example, if other architectures open
>> CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_COPY_MC, but want to use copy_mc_to_user() outside the
>> architecture, the code add to include/linux/uaddess.h is as follows:
>>
>>       #ifndef copy_mc_to_user
>>       static inline unsigned long __must_check
>>       copy_mc_to_user(void *dst, const void *src, size_t cnt)
>>       {
>> 	    ...
>>       }
>>       #endif
>>
>> Then this definition will conflict with the implementation of x86/powerpc
>> and cause compilation errors as follow:
>>
>> Fixes: ec6347bb4339 ("x86, powerpc: Rename memcpy_mcsafe() to copy_mc_to_{user, kernel}()")
> 
> I don't understand, what does it fix really ? What was the
> (existing/real) bug introduced by that patch and that your are fixing ?
> 
> If those defined had been expected and missing, we would have had a
> build failure. If you have one, can you describe it ?

There will be build failure after patch 3 is added, there is a little
confusing for a reader of this commit in isolation.
In the next version, I will put this patch after patch 3.

Thanks,
Tong.
> 
>> Signed-off-by: Tong Tiangen <tongtiangen@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>    arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h | 1 +
>>    arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h     | 1 +
>>    2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h
>> index 9b82b38ff867..58dbe8e2e318 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h
>> @@ -358,6 +358,7 @@ copy_mc_to_user(void __user *to, const void *from, unsigned long n)
>>    
>>    	return n;
>>    }
>> +#define copy_mc_to_user copy_mc_to_user
>>    #endif
>>    
>>    extern long __copy_from_user_flushcache(void *dst, const void __user *src,
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
>> index f78e2b3501a1..e18c5f098025 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
>> @@ -415,6 +415,7 @@ copy_mc_to_kernel(void *to, const void *from, unsigned len);
>>    
>>    unsigned long __must_check
>>    copy_mc_to_user(void *to, const void *from, unsigned len);
>> +#define copy_mc_to_user copy_mc_to_user
>>    #endif
>>    
>>    /*

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tong Tiangen <tongtiangen@huawei.com>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	"Alexander Viro" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>,
	Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com>,
	 "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Guohanjun <guohanjun@huawei.com>,
	"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v4 1/7] x86, powerpc: fix function define in copy_mc_to_user
Date: Tue, 3 May 2022 09:06:18 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48f2779d-bc62-c7f5-c40e-7238a16b90fb@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <91011a66-b125-b445-1486-bada8e06b994@csgroup.eu>



在 2022/5/2 22:24, Christophe Leroy 写道:
> 
> 
> Le 20/04/2022 à 05:04, Tong Tiangen a écrit :
>> x86/powerpc has it's implementation of copy_mc_to_user but not use #define
>> to declare.
>>
>> This may cause problems, for example, if other architectures open
>> CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_COPY_MC, but want to use copy_mc_to_user() outside the
>> architecture, the code add to include/linux/uaddess.h is as follows:
>>
>>       #ifndef copy_mc_to_user
>>       static inline unsigned long __must_check
>>       copy_mc_to_user(void *dst, const void *src, size_t cnt)
>>       {
>> 	    ...
>>       }
>>       #endif
>>
>> Then this definition will conflict with the implementation of x86/powerpc
>> and cause compilation errors as follow:
>>
>> Fixes: ec6347bb4339 ("x86, powerpc: Rename memcpy_mcsafe() to copy_mc_to_{user, kernel}()")
> 
> I don't understand, what does it fix really ? What was the
> (existing/real) bug introduced by that patch and that your are fixing ?
> 
> If those defined had been expected and missing, we would have had a
> build failure. If you have one, can you describe it ?

There will be build failure after patch 3 is added, there is a little
confusing for a reader of this commit in isolation.
In the next version, I will put this patch after patch 3.

Thanks,
Tong.
> 
>> Signed-off-by: Tong Tiangen <tongtiangen@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>    arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h | 1 +
>>    arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h     | 1 +
>>    2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h
>> index 9b82b38ff867..58dbe8e2e318 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h
>> @@ -358,6 +358,7 @@ copy_mc_to_user(void __user *to, const void *from, unsigned long n)
>>    
>>    	return n;
>>    }
>> +#define copy_mc_to_user copy_mc_to_user
>>    #endif
>>    
>>    extern long __copy_from_user_flushcache(void *dst, const void __user *src,
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
>> index f78e2b3501a1..e18c5f098025 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
>> @@ -415,6 +415,7 @@ copy_mc_to_kernel(void *to, const void *from, unsigned len);
>>    
>>    unsigned long __must_check
>>    copy_mc_to_user(void *to, const void *from, unsigned len);
>> +#define copy_mc_to_user copy_mc_to_user
>>    #endif
>>    
>>    /*

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-03  1:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 96+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-20  3:04 [PATCH -next v4 0/7]arm64: add machine check safe support Tong Tiangen
2022-04-20  3:04 ` Tong Tiangen
2022-04-20  3:04 ` Tong Tiangen
2022-04-20  3:04 ` [PATCH -next v4 1/7] x86, powerpc: fix function define in copy_mc_to_user Tong Tiangen
2022-04-20  3:04   ` Tong Tiangen
2022-04-20  3:04   ` Tong Tiangen
2022-04-22  9:45   ` Michael Ellerman
2022-04-22  9:45     ` Michael Ellerman
2022-04-22  9:45     ` Michael Ellerman
2022-04-24  1:16     ` Tong Tiangen
2022-04-24  1:16       ` Tong Tiangen
2022-04-24  1:16       ` Tong Tiangen
2022-05-02 14:24   ` Christophe Leroy
2022-05-02 14:24     ` Christophe Leroy
2022-05-03  1:06     ` Tong Tiangen [this message]
2022-05-03  1:06       ` Tong Tiangen
2022-05-05  1:21       ` Kefeng Wang
2022-05-05  1:21         ` Kefeng Wang
2022-04-20  3:04 ` [PATCH -next v4 2/7] arm64: fix types in copy_highpage() Tong Tiangen
2022-04-20  3:04   ` Tong Tiangen
2022-04-20  3:04   ` Tong Tiangen
2022-04-20  3:04 ` [PATCH -next v4 3/7] arm64: add support for machine check error safe Tong Tiangen
2022-04-20  3:04   ` Tong Tiangen
2022-04-20  3:04   ` Tong Tiangen
2022-05-13 15:26   ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-13 15:26     ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-13 15:26     ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-19  6:29     ` Tong Tiangen
2022-05-19  6:29       ` Tong Tiangen
2022-05-19  6:29       ` Tong Tiangen
2022-05-25  8:30       ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-25  8:30         ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-25  8:30         ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-26  3:36         ` Tong Tiangen
2022-05-26  3:36           ` Tong Tiangen
2022-05-26  3:36           ` Tong Tiangen
2022-05-26  9:50           ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-26  9:50             ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-26  9:50             ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-27  1:40             ` Tong Tiangen
2022-05-27  1:40               ` Tong Tiangen
2022-05-27  1:40               ` Tong Tiangen
2022-04-20  3:04 ` [PATCH -next v4 4/7] arm64: add copy_{to, from}_user to machine check safe Tong Tiangen
2022-04-20  3:04   ` Tong Tiangen
2022-04-20  3:04   ` Tong Tiangen
2022-05-04 10:26   ` Catalin Marinas
2022-05-04 10:26     ` Catalin Marinas
2022-05-04 10:26     ` Catalin Marinas
2022-05-05  6:39     ` Tong Tiangen
2022-05-05  6:39       ` Tong Tiangen
2022-05-05  6:39       ` Tong Tiangen
2022-05-05 13:41       ` Catalin Marinas
2022-05-05 13:41         ` Catalin Marinas
2022-05-05 13:41         ` Catalin Marinas
2022-05-05 14:33         ` Tong Tiangen
2022-05-05 14:33           ` Tong Tiangen
2022-05-05 14:33           ` Tong Tiangen
2022-05-13 15:31   ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-13 15:31     ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-13 15:31     ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-19  6:53     ` Tong Tiangen
2022-05-19  6:53       ` Tong Tiangen
2022-05-19  6:53       ` Tong Tiangen
2022-04-20  3:04 ` [PATCH -next v4 5/7] arm64: mte: Clean up user tag accessors Tong Tiangen
2022-04-20  3:04   ` Tong Tiangen
2022-04-20  3:04   ` Tong Tiangen
2022-05-13 15:36   ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-13 15:36     ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-13 15:36     ` Mark Rutland
2022-04-20  3:04 ` [PATCH -next v4 6/7] arm64: add {get, put}_user to machine check safe Tong Tiangen
2022-04-20  3:04   ` Tong Tiangen
2022-04-20  3:04   ` Tong Tiangen
2022-05-13 15:39   ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-13 15:39     ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-13 15:39     ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-19  7:09     ` Tong Tiangen
2022-05-19  7:09       ` Tong Tiangen
2022-05-19  7:09       ` Tong Tiangen
2022-04-20  3:04 ` [PATCH -next v4 7/7] arm64: add cow " Tong Tiangen
2022-04-20  3:04   ` Tong Tiangen
2022-04-20  3:04   ` Tong Tiangen
2022-05-13 15:44   ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-13 15:44     ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-13 15:44     ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-19 10:38     ` Tong Tiangen
2022-05-19 10:38       ` Tong Tiangen
2022-05-19 10:38       ` Tong Tiangen
2022-04-27  9:09 ` [PATCH -next v4 0/7]arm64: add machine check safe support Tong Tiangen
2022-04-27  9:09   ` Tong Tiangen
2022-04-27  9:09   ` Tong Tiangen
2022-05-04 19:58 ` (subset) " Catalin Marinas
2022-05-04 19:58   ` Catalin Marinas
2022-05-04 19:58   ` Catalin Marinas
2022-05-16 18:45 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-05-16 18:45   ` Catalin Marinas
2022-05-16 18:45   ` Catalin Marinas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=48f2779d-bc62-c7f5-c40e-7238a16b90fb@huawei.com \
    --to=tongtiangen@huawei.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xiexiuqi@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.