All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, grant.likely@linaro.org,
	sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com,
	zhangfei.gao@linaro.org, joe@perches.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux@arm.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 4/6] net: hip04: Don't free the tx skb when the buffer is not ready for xmit
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 10:41:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4971105.FJGVdDRE9f@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <552F560D.4070309@huawei.com>

On Thursday 16 April 2015 14:26:21 Ding Tianhong wrote:
> On 2015/4/15 22:19, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Wednesday 15 April 2015 20:30:06 Ding Tianhong wrote:
> >> @@ -489,6 +487,8 @@ static int hip04_mac_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *ndev)
> >>  
> >>         /* Ensure tx_head update visible to tx reclaim */
> >>         smp_wmb();
> >> +       count++;
> >> +       priv->tx_head = TX_NEXT(tx_head);
> >>  
> >>
> > 
> > Something is wrong here, the comment does not match the code any more, because
> > the smp_wmb() won't actually make the tx_head update visible.
> > 
> >       Arnd
> > 
> Yes, the smp_wmb() could only make sure the tx buffer was ready to xmit.

The problem you need to avoid is that the tx reclaim function thinks it's
done with all outstanding packets and does not retrigger, while the
start_xmit thinks it will still get to that. This means you
need a barrier between the priv->tx_head update and the
napi_schedule_prep() call.

	Arnd

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next 4/6] net: hip04: Don't free the tx skb when the buffer is not ready for xmit
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 10:41:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4971105.FJGVdDRE9f@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <552F560D.4070309@huawei.com>

On Thursday 16 April 2015 14:26:21 Ding Tianhong wrote:
> On 2015/4/15 22:19, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Wednesday 15 April 2015 20:30:06 Ding Tianhong wrote:
> >> @@ -489,6 +487,8 @@ static int hip04_mac_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *ndev)
> >>  
> >>         /* Ensure tx_head update visible to tx reclaim */
> >>         smp_wmb();
> >> +       count++;
> >> +       priv->tx_head = TX_NEXT(tx_head);
> >>  
> >>
> > 
> > Something is wrong here, the comment does not match the code any more, because
> > the smp_wmb() won't actually make the tx_head update visible.
> > 
> >       Arnd
> > 
> Yes, the smp_wmb() could only make sure the tx buffer was ready to xmit.

The problem you need to avoid is that the tx reclaim function thinks it's
done with all outstanding packets and does not retrigger, while the
start_xmit thinks it will still get to that. This means you
need a barrier between the priv->tx_head update and the
napi_schedule_prep() call.

	Arnd

  reply	other threads:[~2015-04-16  8:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-15 12:30 [PATCH net-next 0/6] net: hip04: fix some problem for hip04 drivers Ding Tianhong
2015-04-15 12:30 ` Ding Tianhong
2015-04-15 12:30 ` Ding Tianhong
2015-04-15 12:30 ` [PATCH net-next 1/6] net: hip04: Set more appropriate value for tx coalesce num Ding Tianhong
2015-04-15 12:30   ` Ding Tianhong
2015-04-15 12:30   ` Ding Tianhong
2015-04-15 14:11   ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-04-15 14:11     ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-04-15 12:30 ` [PATCH net-next 4/6] net: hip04: Don't free the tx skb when the buffer is not ready for xmit Ding Tianhong
2015-04-15 12:30   ` Ding Tianhong
2015-04-15 12:30   ` Ding Tianhong
2015-04-15 14:19   ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-04-15 14:19     ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-04-16  6:26     ` Ding Tianhong
2015-04-16  6:26       ` Ding Tianhong
2015-04-16  6:26       ` Ding Tianhong
2015-04-16  8:41       ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2015-04-16  8:41         ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-04-16  9:38         ` Ding Tianhong
2015-04-16  9:38           ` Ding Tianhong
2015-04-16  9:38           ` Ding Tianhong
     [not found] ` <1429101008-9464-1-git-send-email-dingtianhong-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2015-04-15 12:30   ` [PATCH net-next 2/6] net: hip04: use the big endian for tx and rx desc Ding Tianhong
2015-04-15 12:30     ` Ding Tianhong
2015-04-15 12:30     ` Ding Tianhong
     [not found]     ` <1429101008-9464-3-git-send-email-dingtianhong-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2015-04-15 14:13       ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-04-15 14:13         ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-04-16  6:25         ` Ding Tianhong
2015-04-16  6:25           ` Ding Tianhong
2015-04-16  6:25           ` Ding Tianhong
2015-04-15 12:30   ` [PATCH net-next 3/6] net: hip04: Solve the problem of the skb memory allocation failure Ding Tianhong
2015-04-15 12:30     ` Ding Tianhong
2015-04-15 12:30     ` Ding Tianhong
     [not found]     ` <1429101008-9464-4-git-send-email-dingtianhong-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2015-04-15 14:17       ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-04-15 14:17         ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-04-15 12:30   ` [PATCH net-next 5/6] net: hip04: remove the unnecessary check Ding Tianhong
2015-04-15 12:30     ` Ding Tianhong
2015-04-15 12:30     ` Ding Tianhong
2015-04-15 14:14     ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-04-15 14:14       ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-04-15 12:30   ` [PATCH net-next 6/6] net: hip04: add ratelimit for rx/tx drops skb Ding Tianhong
2015-04-15 12:30     ` Ding Tianhong
2015-04-15 12:30     ` Ding Tianhong
     [not found]     ` <1429101008-9464-7-git-send-email-dingtianhong-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2015-04-15 14:20       ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-04-15 14:20         ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-04-15 14:25 ` [PATCH net-next 0/6] net: hip04: fix some problem for hip04 drivers Arnd Bergmann
2015-04-15 14:25   ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-04-16  6:28   ` Ding Tianhong
2015-04-16  6:28     ` Ding Tianhong
2015-04-16  6:28     ` Ding Tianhong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4971105.FJGVdDRE9f@wuerfel \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dingtianhong@huawei.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com \
    --cc=zhangfei.gao@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.