From: Timur Tabi <timur@freescale.com>
To: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>,
Linuxppc-dev Development <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: removing get_immrbase()??
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:46:01 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49EF9019.7000102@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DC91BA72-AF10-41DD-B610-EDEFD106A811@kernel.crashing.org>
Kumar Gala wrote:
> The specific issue I'm talking about is the addition of new nodes that
> might break old device trees.
New nodes or new properties? The CPM nodes are not new. On some device
trees, the original versions did not have a compatible property for the
CPM nodes (e.g. commit 0b5cf10691eb2c95a9126bf25f5e084d83d5d743).
Therefore, there are device trees out there that are missing some property.
Like I said earlier, if you can demonstrate that *all* of these device
tree would be broken with the latest kernel anyway, then we don't need
to worry about backwards compatibility.
I'm tired of debugging customer issues where the kernel is updated but
the firmware and device tree aren't. IMHO, Kernel developers are
generally too lax when it comes to firmware and device tree backwards
compatibility, and I think that's wrong.
--
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-22 21:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-22 18:38 removing get_immrbase()?? Kumar Gala
2009-04-22 19:35 ` Timur Tabi
2009-04-22 20:16 ` Scott Wood
2009-04-22 20:16 ` Timur Tabi
2009-04-22 20:20 ` Scott Wood
2009-04-22 21:31 ` Kumar Gala
2009-04-22 21:33 ` Timur Tabi
2009-04-22 21:39 ` Kumar Gala
2009-04-22 21:46 ` Timur Tabi [this message]
2009-04-22 21:54 ` Kumar Gala
2009-04-22 21:57 ` Timur Tabi
2009-04-22 22:07 ` Kumar Gala
2009-04-22 22:00 ` Scott Wood
2009-04-22 22:00 ` Timur Tabi
2009-04-23 13:54 ` Grant Likely
2009-04-22 21:38 ` Scott Wood
2009-04-22 21:55 ` Kumar Gala
2009-04-22 22:33 ` Scott Wood
2009-04-23 0:03 ` Timur Tabi
2009-04-23 2:26 ` David Gibson
2009-04-23 3:36 ` Kumar Gala
2009-04-23 4:06 ` David Gibson
2009-04-23 4:41 ` Kumar Gala
2009-04-28 4:12 ` David Gibson
2009-04-28 13:48 ` Timur Tabi
2009-04-23 13:07 ` Timur Tabi
2009-04-23 15:56 ` Scott Wood
2009-04-23 13:02 ` Timur Tabi
2009-04-23 13:50 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-04-23 14:02 ` Timur Tabi
2009-04-23 14:06 ` Kumar Gala
2009-04-23 14:09 ` Timur Tabi
2009-04-24 14:40 ` Wrobel Heinz-R39252
2009-04-23 14:13 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-04-23 16:00 ` Scott Wood
2009-04-23 16:54 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-04-23 17:03 ` Scott Wood
2009-04-23 17:26 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-04-23 17:59 ` Scott Wood
2009-04-28 4:25 ` David Gibson
2009-04-28 4:21 ` David Gibson
2009-04-23 13:53 ` Grant Likely
2009-04-23 14:03 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-04-28 4:26 ` David Gibson
2009-04-22 19:44 ` Scott Wood
2009-04-22 20:00 ` Kumar Gala
2009-04-22 20:30 ` Scott Wood
2009-04-23 13:53 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49EF9019.7000102@freescale.com \
--to=timur@freescale.com \
--cc=galak@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.