From: Dario Faggioli <dfaggioli@suse.com> To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Cc: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] xen: credit2: avoid using cpumask_weight() in hot-paths Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 15:01:15 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <49b2fb80a576cff4b26ae09668cc8b5b243a9f9a.camel@suse.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <c7f0e1c1-f69f-3c53-7147-21e24d4618b1@citrix.com> [-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1732 bytes --] On Tue, 2019-04-23 at 10:44 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 20/04/2019 16:24, Dario Faggioli wrote: > > Definitely +1 to algorithm changes which avoid its use entirely. > > A few cosmetic observations. > Ok... > > diff --git a/xen/common/sched_credit2.c > > b/xen/common/sched_credit2.c > > index 6958b265fc..7034325243 100644 > > --- a/xen/common/sched_credit2.c > > +++ b/xen/common/sched_credit2.c > > @@ -466,6 +466,7 @@ struct csched2_runqueue_data { > > spinlock_t lock; /* Lock for this > > runqueue */ > > > > struct list_head runq; /* Ordered list of runnable > > vms */ > > + int nr_cpus; /* How many CPUs are sharing this > > runqueue */ > > Unsigned int. > Yep. > > @@ -3944,8 +3951,12 @@ csched2_deinit_pdata(const struct scheduler > > *ops, void *pcpu, int cpu) > > __cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, &rqd->smt_idle); > > __cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, &rqd->active); > > > > - if ( cpumask_empty(&rqd->active) ) > > + rqd->nr_cpus--; > > + ASSERT(cpumask_weight(&rqd->active) == rqd->nr_cpus); > > + > > + if ( rqd->nr_cpus == 0 ) > > { > > + ASSERT(cpumask_empty(&rqd->active)); > > And here. > Right. Not sure how they ended in there. Will remove them. > Is it really worth having both asserts? The second is redundant. > I think I agree. I'll keep the first one only. Thanks and Regards -- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D http://about.me/dario.faggioli Virtualization Software Engineer SUSE Labs, SUSE https://www.suse.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------------- <<This happens because _I_ choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere) [-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --] [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 157 bytes --] _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dario Faggioli <dfaggioli@suse.com> To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Cc: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] xen: credit2: avoid using cpumask_weight() in hot-paths Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 15:01:15 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <49b2fb80a576cff4b26ae09668cc8b5b243a9f9a.camel@suse.com> (raw) Message-ID: <20190426130115.jKP46pnAXxSXtof-pAmAq1iATcFRwnYVSqDn-_tNUWM@z> (raw) In-Reply-To: <c7f0e1c1-f69f-3c53-7147-21e24d4618b1@citrix.com> [-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1732 bytes --] On Tue, 2019-04-23 at 10:44 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 20/04/2019 16:24, Dario Faggioli wrote: > > Definitely +1 to algorithm changes which avoid its use entirely. > > A few cosmetic observations. > Ok... > > diff --git a/xen/common/sched_credit2.c > > b/xen/common/sched_credit2.c > > index 6958b265fc..7034325243 100644 > > --- a/xen/common/sched_credit2.c > > +++ b/xen/common/sched_credit2.c > > @@ -466,6 +466,7 @@ struct csched2_runqueue_data { > > spinlock_t lock; /* Lock for this > > runqueue */ > > > > struct list_head runq; /* Ordered list of runnable > > vms */ > > + int nr_cpus; /* How many CPUs are sharing this > > runqueue */ > > Unsigned int. > Yep. > > @@ -3944,8 +3951,12 @@ csched2_deinit_pdata(const struct scheduler > > *ops, void *pcpu, int cpu) > > __cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, &rqd->smt_idle); > > __cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, &rqd->active); > > > > - if ( cpumask_empty(&rqd->active) ) > > + rqd->nr_cpus--; > > + ASSERT(cpumask_weight(&rqd->active) == rqd->nr_cpus); > > + > > + if ( rqd->nr_cpus == 0 ) > > { > > + ASSERT(cpumask_empty(&rqd->active)); > > And here. > Right. Not sure how they ended in there. Will remove them. > Is it really worth having both asserts? The second is redundant. > I think I agree. I'll keep the first one only. Thanks and Regards -- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D http://about.me/dario.faggioli Virtualization Software Engineer SUSE Labs, SUSE https://www.suse.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------------- <<This happens because _I_ choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere) [-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --] [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 157 bytes --] _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-26 13:01 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2019-04-20 15:24 [PATCH 0/2] xen: sched/Credit2: small and trivial improvements Dario Faggioli 2019-04-20 15:24 ` [Xen-devel] " Dario Faggioli 2019-04-20 15:24 ` [PATCH 1/2] xen: credit2: avoid using cpumask_weight() in hot-paths Dario Faggioli 2019-04-20 15:24 ` [Xen-devel] " Dario Faggioli 2019-04-23 9:44 ` Andrew Cooper 2019-04-23 9:44 ` [Xen-devel] " Andrew Cooper 2019-04-26 13:01 ` Dario Faggioli [this message] 2019-04-26 13:01 ` Dario Faggioli 2019-04-23 9:48 ` Andrii Anisov 2019-04-23 9:48 ` [Xen-devel] " Andrii Anisov 2019-04-20 15:24 ` [PATCH 2/2] xen: sched: we never get into context_switch() with prev==next Dario Faggioli 2019-04-20 15:24 ` [Xen-devel] " Dario Faggioli 2019-04-21 17:08 ` Julien Grall 2019-04-21 17:08 ` [Xen-devel] " Julien Grall 2019-04-23 9:13 ` Andrii Anisov 2019-04-23 9:13 ` [Xen-devel] " Andrii Anisov 2019-04-23 9:47 ` Andrew Cooper 2019-04-23 9:47 ` [Xen-devel] " Andrew Cooper 2019-04-23 10:33 ` Andrii Anisov 2019-04-23 10:33 ` [Xen-devel] " Andrii Anisov 2019-04-26 15:13 ` Dario Faggioli 2019-04-26 15:13 ` [Xen-devel] " Dario Faggioli 2019-04-26 16:22 ` Julien Grall 2019-04-26 16:22 ` [Xen-devel] " Julien Grall 2019-04-26 16:26 ` Andrew Cooper 2019-04-26 16:26 ` [Xen-devel] " Andrew Cooper 2019-05-08 10:03 ` Andrii Anisov 2019-05-08 10:03 ` [Xen-devel] " Andrii Anisov 2019-04-23 9:50 ` George Dunlap 2019-04-23 9:50 ` [Xen-devel] " George Dunlap 2019-04-23 9:56 ` Juergen Gross 2019-04-23 9:56 ` [Xen-devel] " Juergen Gross 2019-04-26 12:58 ` Dario Faggioli 2019-04-26 12:58 ` [Xen-devel] " Dario Faggioli 2019-04-23 10:00 ` Andrew Cooper 2019-04-23 10:00 ` [Xen-devel] " Andrew Cooper
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=49b2fb80a576cff4b26ae09668cc8b5b243a9f9a.camel@suse.com \ --to=dfaggioli@suse.com \ --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \ --cc=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \ --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.