All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
To: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clocksource/arm_arch_timer: Store physical timer IRQ number for KVM on VHE
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 10:15:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49f5b2c1-8bbc-9475-e7bb-60857f622357@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190124134612.7487-1-christoffer.dall@arm.com>

On 24/01/2019 14:46, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> From: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
> 
> A host running in VHE mode gets the EL2 physical timer as its time
> source (accessed using the EL1 sysreg accessors, which get re-directed
> to the EL2 sysregs by VHE).
> 
> The EL1 physical timer remains unused by the host kernel, allowing us to
> pass that on directly to a KVM guest and saves us from emulating this
> timer for the guest on VHE systems.
> 
> Store the EL1 Physical Timer's IRQ number in
> struct arch_timer_kvm_info on VHE systems to allow KVM to use it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>
> ---
> Patches in preparation for nested virtualization on KVM/Arm depend on this
> change, so we would like to merge this via the kvmarm tree or have a stable
> branch including this patch.
> 
> Please let us know your preference.  Thanks.

Hi Christopher,

sorry for the delay. I'm fine if you want to take it through your tree.

Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>



>  drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c | 11 +++++++++--
>  include/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.h |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> index 9a7d4dc00b6e..b9243e2328b4 100644
> --- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> @@ -1206,6 +1206,13 @@ static enum arch_timer_ppi_nr __init arch_timer_select_ppi(void)
>  	return ARCH_TIMER_PHYS_SECURE_PPI;
>  }
>  
> +static void __init arch_timer_populate_kvm_info(void)
> +{
> +	arch_timer_kvm_info.virtual_irq = arch_timer_ppi[ARCH_TIMER_VIRT_PPI];
> +	if (is_kernel_in_hyp_mode())
> +		arch_timer_kvm_info.physical_irq = arch_timer_ppi[ARCH_TIMER_PHYS_NONSECURE_PPI];
> +}
> +
>  static int __init arch_timer_of_init(struct device_node *np)
>  {
>  	int i, ret;
> @@ -1220,7 +1227,7 @@ static int __init arch_timer_of_init(struct device_node *np)
>  	for (i = ARCH_TIMER_PHYS_SECURE_PPI; i < ARCH_TIMER_MAX_TIMER_PPI; i++)
>  		arch_timer_ppi[i] = irq_of_parse_and_map(np, i);
>  
> -	arch_timer_kvm_info.virtual_irq = arch_timer_ppi[ARCH_TIMER_VIRT_PPI];
> +	arch_timer_populate_kvm_info();
>  
>  	rate = arch_timer_get_cntfrq();
>  	arch_timer_of_configure_rate(rate, np);
> @@ -1550,7 +1557,7 @@ static int __init arch_timer_acpi_init(struct acpi_table_header *table)
>  	arch_timer_ppi[ARCH_TIMER_HYP_PPI] =
>  		acpi_gtdt_map_ppi(ARCH_TIMER_HYP_PPI);
>  
> -	arch_timer_kvm_info.virtual_irq = arch_timer_ppi[ARCH_TIMER_VIRT_PPI];
> +	arch_timer_populate_kvm_info();
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * When probing via ACPI, we have no mechanism to override the sysreg
> diff --git a/include/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.h b/include/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.h
> index 349e5957c949..702967d996bb 100644
> --- a/include/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.h
> +++ b/include/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.h
> @@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ enum arch_timer_spi_nr {
>  struct arch_timer_kvm_info {
>  	struct timecounter timecounter;
>  	int virtual_irq;
> +	int physical_irq;
>  };
>  
>  struct arch_timer_mem_frame {
> 


-- 
 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
To: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
	Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clocksource/arm_arch_timer: Store physical timer IRQ number for KVM on VHE
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 10:15:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49f5b2c1-8bbc-9475-e7bb-60857f622357@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190124134612.7487-1-christoffer.dall@arm.com>

On 24/01/2019 14:46, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> From: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
> 
> A host running in VHE mode gets the EL2 physical timer as its time
> source (accessed using the EL1 sysreg accessors, which get re-directed
> to the EL2 sysregs by VHE).
> 
> The EL1 physical timer remains unused by the host kernel, allowing us to
> pass that on directly to a KVM guest and saves us from emulating this
> timer for the guest on VHE systems.
> 
> Store the EL1 Physical Timer's IRQ number in
> struct arch_timer_kvm_info on VHE systems to allow KVM to use it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>
> ---
> Patches in preparation for nested virtualization on KVM/Arm depend on this
> change, so we would like to merge this via the kvmarm tree or have a stable
> branch including this patch.
> 
> Please let us know your preference.  Thanks.

Hi Christopher,

sorry for the delay. I'm fine if you want to take it through your tree.

Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>



>  drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c | 11 +++++++++--
>  include/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.h |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> index 9a7d4dc00b6e..b9243e2328b4 100644
> --- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> @@ -1206,6 +1206,13 @@ static enum arch_timer_ppi_nr __init arch_timer_select_ppi(void)
>  	return ARCH_TIMER_PHYS_SECURE_PPI;
>  }
>  
> +static void __init arch_timer_populate_kvm_info(void)
> +{
> +	arch_timer_kvm_info.virtual_irq = arch_timer_ppi[ARCH_TIMER_VIRT_PPI];
> +	if (is_kernel_in_hyp_mode())
> +		arch_timer_kvm_info.physical_irq = arch_timer_ppi[ARCH_TIMER_PHYS_NONSECURE_PPI];
> +}
> +
>  static int __init arch_timer_of_init(struct device_node *np)
>  {
>  	int i, ret;
> @@ -1220,7 +1227,7 @@ static int __init arch_timer_of_init(struct device_node *np)
>  	for (i = ARCH_TIMER_PHYS_SECURE_PPI; i < ARCH_TIMER_MAX_TIMER_PPI; i++)
>  		arch_timer_ppi[i] = irq_of_parse_and_map(np, i);
>  
> -	arch_timer_kvm_info.virtual_irq = arch_timer_ppi[ARCH_TIMER_VIRT_PPI];
> +	arch_timer_populate_kvm_info();
>  
>  	rate = arch_timer_get_cntfrq();
>  	arch_timer_of_configure_rate(rate, np);
> @@ -1550,7 +1557,7 @@ static int __init arch_timer_acpi_init(struct acpi_table_header *table)
>  	arch_timer_ppi[ARCH_TIMER_HYP_PPI] =
>  		acpi_gtdt_map_ppi(ARCH_TIMER_HYP_PPI);
>  
> -	arch_timer_kvm_info.virtual_irq = arch_timer_ppi[ARCH_TIMER_VIRT_PPI];
> +	arch_timer_populate_kvm_info();
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * When probing via ACPI, we have no mechanism to override the sysreg
> diff --git a/include/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.h b/include/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.h
> index 349e5957c949..702967d996bb 100644
> --- a/include/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.h
> +++ b/include/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.h
> @@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ enum arch_timer_spi_nr {
>  struct arch_timer_kvm_info {
>  	struct timecounter timecounter;
>  	int virtual_irq;
> +	int physical_irq;
>  };
>  
>  struct arch_timer_mem_frame {
> 


-- 
 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2019-02-12  9:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-24 13:46 [PATCH] clocksource/arm_arch_timer: Store physical timer IRQ number for KVM on VHE Christoffer Dall
2019-01-24 13:46 ` Christoffer Dall
2019-02-12  9:15 ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2019-02-12  9:15   ` Daniel Lezcano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49f5b2c1-8bbc-9475-e7bb-60857f622357@linaro.org \
    --to=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
    --cc=christoffer.dall@arm.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.