[PATCH] cs5536: define dma_sff_read_status() method

[PATCH] cs5536: define dma_sff_read_status() method

[Sergei Shtylyov]

The driver somehow got merged with the initializer for the dma_sff_read_status()
method missing which caused kernel panic on bootup.

This should fix the kernel.org bug #13026...

Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>

---
This patch is against the recent Linus' tree.
It should go into 2.6.29-stable as the driver was merged/broken in 2.6.29 time.

 drivers/ide/cs5536.c |    1 +
 1 files changed, 1 insertion(+)

Index: linux-2.6/drivers/ide/cs5536.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/ide/cs5536.c
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/ide/cs5536.c
@@ -236,6 +236,7 @@ static const struct ide_dma_ops cs5536_d
 	.dma_test_irq		= ide_dma_test_irq,
 	.dma_lost_irq		= ide_dma_lost_irq,
 	.dma_timer_expiry	= ide_dma_sff_timer_expiry,
+	.dma_sff_read_status	= ide_dma_sff_read_status,
 };
 
 static const struct ide_port_info cs5536_info = {

Re: [stable] [PATCH] cs5536: define dma_sff_read_status() method

[Greg KH]

On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 08:03:40PM +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> The driver somehow got merged with the initializer for the dma_sff_read_status()
> method missing which caused kernel panic on bootup.
> 
> This should fix the kernel.org bug #13026...
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>
> 
> ---
> This patch is against the recent Linus' tree.
> It should go into 2.6.29-stable as the driver was merged/broken in 2.6.29 time.

It doesn't apply to the 2.6.29-stable tree at all.

Care to redo your patch to apply there?

thanks,

greg k-h

Re: [stable] [PATCH] cs5536: define dma_sff_read_status() method

[Sergei Shtylyov]

Greg KH wrote:

>>The driver somehow got merged with the initializer for the dma_sff_read_status()
>>method missing which caused kernel panic on bootup.

>>This should fix the kernel.org bug #13026...

>>Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>

>>---
>>This patch is against the recent Linus' tree.
>>It should go into 2.6.29-stable as the driver was merged/broken in 2.6.29 time.

> It doesn't apply to the 2.6.29-stable tree at all.

> Care to redo your patch to apply there?

    Hm, I thought it was obvious enough... will redo.

> thanks,

> greg k-h

MBR, Sergei