All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] move performance counter MSR access interception to generic x86 KVM path
@ 2009-06-12 20:01 Andre Przywara
  2009-06-14  8:00 ` Avi Kivity
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Andre Przywara @ 2009-06-12 20:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: avi; +Cc: Chris Lalancette, Joerg Roedel, kvm, Andre Przywara

The performance counter MSRs are different for AMD and Intel CPUs and they
are chosen mainly by the CPUID vendor string. This patch catches writes to
all addresses (regardless of VMX/SVM path) and handles them in the generic
MSR handler routine. Writing a 0 into the event select register is something
we perfectly emulate ;-), so don't print out a warning to dmesg in this
case.
This fixes booting a 64bit Windows guest with an AMD CPUID on an Intel host.

Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@amd.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/svm.c |   16 ----------------
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c |   12 ------------
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c |   30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
index 13f6f7d..cdbd4d1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
@@ -2143,22 +2143,6 @@ static int svm_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned ecx, u64 data)
 		else
 			svm_disable_lbrv(svm);
 		break;
-	case MSR_K7_EVNTSEL0:
-	case MSR_K7_EVNTSEL1:
-	case MSR_K7_EVNTSEL2:
-	case MSR_K7_EVNTSEL3:
-	case MSR_K7_PERFCTR0:
-	case MSR_K7_PERFCTR1:
-	case MSR_K7_PERFCTR2:
-	case MSR_K7_PERFCTR3:
-		/*
-		 * Just discard all writes to the performance counters; this
-		 * should keep both older linux and windows 64-bit guests
-		 * happy
-		 */
-		pr_unimpl(vcpu, "unimplemented perfctr wrmsr: 0x%x data 0x%llx\n", ecx, data);
-
-		break;
 	case MSR_VM_HSAVE_PA:
 		svm->hsave_msr = data;
 		break;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
index b949db0..dc502b9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
@@ -1025,18 +1025,6 @@ static int vmx_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr_index, u64 data)
 		rdtscll(host_tsc);
 		guest_write_tsc(data, host_tsc);
 		break;
-	case MSR_P6_PERFCTR0:
-	case MSR_P6_PERFCTR1:
-	case MSR_P6_EVNTSEL0:
-	case MSR_P6_EVNTSEL1:
-		/*
-		 * Just discard all writes to the performance counters; this
-		 * should keep both older linux and windows 64-bit guests
-		 * happy
-		 */
-		pr_unimpl(vcpu, "unimplemented perfctr wrmsr: 0x%x data 0x%llx\n", msr_index, data);
-
-		break;
 	case MSR_IA32_CR_PAT:
 		if (vmcs_config.vmentry_ctrl & VM_ENTRY_LOAD_IA32_PAT) {
 			vmcs_write64(GUEST_IA32_PAT, data);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 1b91ea7..8dae08d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -849,6 +849,36 @@ int kvm_set_msr_common(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr, u64 data)
 	case MSR_IA32_MCG_STATUS:
 	case MSR_IA32_MC0_CTL ... MSR_IA32_MC0_CTL + 4 * KVM_MAX_MCE_BANKS - 1:
 		return set_msr_mce(vcpu, msr, data);
+
+	/* Performance counters are not protected by a CPUID bit,
+	 * so we should check all of them in the generic path for the sake of
+	 * cross vendor migration.
+	 * Writing a zero into the event select MSRs disables them,
+	 * which we perfectly emulate ;-). Any other value should be at least
+	 * reported, some guests depend on them.
+	 */
+	case MSR_P6_EVNTSEL0:
+	case MSR_P6_EVNTSEL1:
+	case MSR_K7_EVNTSEL0:
+	case MSR_K7_EVNTSEL1:
+	case MSR_K7_EVNTSEL2:
+	case MSR_K7_EVNTSEL3:
+		if (data != 0)
+			pr_unimpl(vcpu, "unimplemented perfctr wrmsr: "
+				"0x%x data 0x%llx\n", msr, data);
+		break;
+	/* at least RHEL 4 unconditionally writes to the perfctr registers,
+	 * so we ignore writes to make it happy.
+	 */
+	case MSR_P6_PERFCTR0:
+	case MSR_P6_PERFCTR1:
+	case MSR_K7_PERFCTR0:
+	case MSR_K7_PERFCTR1:
+	case MSR_K7_PERFCTR2:
+	case MSR_K7_PERFCTR3:
+		pr_unimpl(vcpu, "unimplemented perfctr wrmsr: "
+			"0x%x data 0x%llx\n", msr, data);
+		break;
 	default:
 		pr_unimpl(vcpu, "unhandled wrmsr: 0x%x data %llx\n", msr, data);
 		return 1;
-- 
1.6.1.3



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] move performance counter MSR access interception to generic x86 KVM path
  2009-06-12 20:01 [PATCH] move performance counter MSR access interception to generic x86 KVM path Andre Przywara
@ 2009-06-14  8:00 ` Avi Kivity
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Avi Kivity @ 2009-06-14  8:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andre Przywara; +Cc: Chris Lalancette, Joerg Roedel, kvm

Andre Przywara wrote:
> The performance counter MSRs are different for AMD and Intel CPUs and they
> are chosen mainly by the CPUID vendor string. This patch catches writes to
> all addresses (regardless of VMX/SVM path) and handles them in the generic
> MSR handler routine. Writing a 0 into the event select register is something
> we perfectly emulate ;-), so don't print out a warning to dmesg in this
> case.
> This fixes booting a 64bit Windows guest with an AMD CPUID on an Intel host.
>
>   

Applied, thanks.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-06-14  8:00 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-06-12 20:01 [PATCH] move performance counter MSR access interception to generic x86 KVM path Andre Przywara
2009-06-14  8:00 ` Avi Kivity

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.