From: Kazuhito Hagio <k-hagio@ab.jp.nec.com> To: Bhupesh Sharma <bhsharma@redhat.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, "lijiang@redhat.com" <lijiang@redhat.com>, "bhe@redhat.com" <bhe@redhat.com>, "ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org" <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>, "catalin.marinas@arm.com" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Steve Capper <Steve.Capper@arm.com>, "kexec@lists.infradead.org" <kexec@lists.infradead.org>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>, Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@arm.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, "anderson@redhat.com" <anderson@redhat.com>, Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>, "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org> Subject: RE: [PATCH] arm64, vmcoreinfo : Append 'MAX_USER_VA_BITS' and 'MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS' to vmcoreinfo Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 20:47:17 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <4AE2DC15AC0B8543882A74EA0D43DBEC03568A9F@BPXM09GP.gisp.nec.co.jp> (raw) In-Reply-To: <CACi5LpN6gVy4gCTYLGRiWW1VNGrVc-+Ykn919LKsO2bP-v1NHw@mail.gmail.com> Hi Bhupesh, -----Original Message----- > I am not sure you got a chance to look at the two regression cases I > reported here: > <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/kexec/2019-February/022449.html> > > Unfortunately the above suggestion doesn't provide any fix for > ARMv8.2-LPA regression (see text under heading ' > (1). Regression Case 1 (ARMv8.2-LPA enabled kernel)') As for MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS, I realized that ppc64 makedumpfile can detect it because there is only one SECTION_SIZE_BITS for ppc64. I think we can use the same way as set_ppc64_max_physmem_bits() does also for arm64 for now. I'm going to write it for kernels not having NUMBER(MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS) in vmcoreinfo. Thanks, Kazu > > After going through the regression reports, I think exporting > 'MAX_USER_VA_BITS' and 'MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS' to vmcoreinfo is sufficient > for the above regressions (without over-complicating the stuff) as > ARM64_TCR.T1SZ and friends seem to arch specific as compared to > VA_BITS + 'MAX_USER_VA_BITS' . > > Thanks, > Bhupesh _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kazuhito Hagio <k-hagio@ab.jp.nec.com> To: Bhupesh Sharma <bhsharma@redhat.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, "lijiang@redhat.com" <lijiang@redhat.com>, "bhe@redhat.com" <bhe@redhat.com>, "ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org" <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>, "catalin.marinas@arm.com" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Steve Capper <Steve.Capper@arm.com>, "kexec@lists.infradead.org" <kexec@lists.infradead.org>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>, Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@arm.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, "anderson@redhat.com" <anderson@redhat.com>, Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>, "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org> Subject: RE: [PATCH] arm64, vmcoreinfo : Append 'MAX_USER_VA_BITS' and 'MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS' to vmcoreinfo Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 20:47:17 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <4AE2DC15AC0B8543882A74EA0D43DBEC03568A9F@BPXM09GP.gisp.nec.co.jp> (raw) In-Reply-To: <CACi5LpN6gVy4gCTYLGRiWW1VNGrVc-+Ykn919LKsO2bP-v1NHw@mail.gmail.com> Hi Bhupesh, -----Original Message----- > I am not sure you got a chance to look at the two regression cases I > reported here: > <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/kexec/2019-February/022449.html> > > Unfortunately the above suggestion doesn't provide any fix for > ARMv8.2-LPA regression (see text under heading ' > (1). Regression Case 1 (ARMv8.2-LPA enabled kernel)') As for MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS, I realized that ppc64 makedumpfile can detect it because there is only one SECTION_SIZE_BITS for ppc64. I think we can use the same way as set_ppc64_max_physmem_bits() does also for arm64 for now. I'm going to write it for kernels not having NUMBER(MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS) in vmcoreinfo. Thanks, Kazu > > After going through the regression reports, I think exporting > 'MAX_USER_VA_BITS' and 'MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS' to vmcoreinfo is sufficient > for the above regressions (without over-complicating the stuff) as > ARM64_TCR.T1SZ and friends seem to arch specific as compared to > VA_BITS + 'MAX_USER_VA_BITS' . > > Thanks, > Bhupesh _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-19 20:48 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2019-01-30 12:23 [PATCH] arm64, vmcoreinfo : Append 'MAX_USER_VA_BITS' and 'MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS' to vmcoreinfo Bhupesh Sharma 2019-01-30 12:23 ` Bhupesh Sharma 2019-01-30 15:21 ` James Morse 2019-01-30 15:21 ` James Morse 2019-01-30 21:39 ` Bhupesh Sharma 2019-01-30 21:39 ` Bhupesh Sharma 2019-02-04 14:35 ` Bhupesh Sharma 2019-02-04 14:35 ` Bhupesh Sharma 2019-02-04 15:31 ` Robin Murphy 2019-02-04 15:31 ` Robin Murphy 2019-02-12 4:55 ` Bhupesh Sharma 2019-02-12 4:55 ` Bhupesh Sharma 2019-02-12 10:49 ` Robin Murphy 2019-02-12 10:49 ` Robin Murphy 2019-02-04 16:56 ` James Morse 2019-02-04 16:56 ` James Morse 2019-01-31 1:48 ` Dave Young 2019-01-31 1:48 ` Dave Young 2019-01-31 10:00 ` Bhupesh Sharma 2019-01-31 10:00 ` Bhupesh Sharma 2019-01-31 14:03 ` Dave Anderson 2019-01-31 14:03 ` Dave Anderson 2019-02-04 16:04 ` Kazuhito Hagio 2019-02-04 16:04 ` Kazuhito Hagio 2019-02-12 5:07 ` Bhupesh Sharma 2019-02-12 5:07 ` Bhupesh Sharma 2019-02-12 10:44 ` Dave Young 2019-02-12 10:44 ` Dave Young 2019-02-12 19:59 ` Bhupesh Sharma 2019-02-12 19:59 ` Bhupesh Sharma 2019-02-12 23:03 ` Kazuhito Hagio 2019-02-12 23:03 ` Kazuhito Hagio 2019-02-13 11:15 ` Dave Young 2019-02-13 11:15 ` Dave Young 2019-02-13 18:22 ` James Morse 2019-02-13 18:22 ` James Morse 2019-02-13 19:52 ` Kazuhito Hagio 2019-02-13 19:52 ` Kazuhito Hagio 2019-02-15 17:34 ` James Morse 2019-02-15 17:34 ` James Morse 2019-02-15 18:01 ` Bhupesh Sharma 2019-02-15 18:01 ` Bhupesh Sharma 2019-02-18 15:27 ` Steve Capper 2019-02-18 15:27 ` Steve Capper 2019-02-21 16:08 ` Bhupesh Sharma 2019-02-21 16:08 ` Bhupesh Sharma 2019-02-19 20:47 ` Kazuhito Hagio [this message] 2019-02-19 20:47 ` Kazuhito Hagio 2019-02-21 16:20 ` Bhupesh Sharma 2019-02-21 16:20 ` Bhupesh Sharma 2019-02-21 16:42 ` Dave Anderson 2019-02-21 16:42 ` Dave Anderson 2019-02-21 19:02 ` Kazuhito Hagio 2019-02-21 19:02 ` Kazuhito Hagio 2019-03-01 4:01 ` Bhupesh Sharma 2019-03-01 4:01 ` Bhupesh Sharma 2019-02-14 19:30 ` Bhupesh Sharma 2019-02-14 19:30 ` Bhupesh Sharma
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=4AE2DC15AC0B8543882A74EA0D43DBEC03568A9F@BPXM09GP.gisp.nec.co.jp \ --to=k-hagio@ab.jp.nec.com \ --cc=Steve.Capper@arm.com \ --cc=anderson@redhat.com \ --cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \ --cc=bhe@redhat.com \ --cc=bhsharma@redhat.com \ --cc=bp@alien8.de \ --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \ --cc=dyoung@redhat.com \ --cc=james.morse@arm.com \ --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=kristina.martsenko@arm.com \ --cc=lijiang@redhat.com \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \ --cc=takahiro.akashi@linaro.org \ --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.