* [PATCH 4/9] net/sctp: Eliminate useless code
@ 2010-01-16 15:58 ` Julia Lawall
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Julia Lawall @ 2010-01-16 15:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vlad Yasevich, Sridhar Samudrala, David S. Miller, linux-sctp,
netdev, linux-kernel, kernel-janitors
From: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
The variable newinet is initialized twice to the same (side effect-free)
expression. Drop one initialization.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is:
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@forall@
idexpression *x;
identifier f!=ERR_PTR;
@@
x = f(...)
... when != x
(
x = f(...,<+...x...+>,...)
|
* x = f(...)
)
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
---
net/sctp/socket.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c
index 67fdac9..f6d1e59 100644
--- a/net/sctp/socket.c
+++ b/net/sctp/socket.c
@@ -6359,7 +6359,7 @@ void sctp_copy_sock(struct sock *newsk, struct sock *sk,
struct sctp_association *asoc)
{
struct inet_sock *inet = inet_sk(sk);
- struct inet_sock *newinet = inet_sk(newsk);
+ struct inet_sock *newinet;
newsk->sk_type = sk->sk_type;
newsk->sk_bound_dev_if = sk->sk_bound_dev_if;
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* [PATCH 4/9] net/sctp: Eliminate useless code
@ 2010-01-16 15:58 ` Julia Lawall
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Julia Lawall @ 2010-01-16 15:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vlad Yasevich, Sridhar Samudrala, David S. Miller, linux-sctp,
netdev, linux-kernel, kernel-janitors
From: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
The variable newinet is initialized twice to the same (side effect-free)
expression. Drop one initialization.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is:
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@forall@
idexpression *x;
identifier f!=ERR_PTR;
@@
x = f(...)
... when != x
(
x = f(...,<+...x...+>,...)
|
* x = f(...)
)
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
---
net/sctp/socket.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c
index 67fdac9..f6d1e59 100644
--- a/net/sctp/socket.c
+++ b/net/sctp/socket.c
@@ -6359,7 +6359,7 @@ void sctp_copy_sock(struct sock *newsk, struct sock *sk,
struct sctp_association *asoc)
{
struct inet_sock *inet = inet_sk(sk);
- struct inet_sock *newinet = inet_sk(newsk);
+ struct inet_sock *newinet;
newsk->sk_type = sk->sk_type;
newsk->sk_bound_dev_if = sk->sk_bound_dev_if;
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* [PATCH 4/9] net/sctp: Eliminate useless code
@ 2010-01-16 15:58 ` Julia Lawall
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Julia Lawall @ 2010-01-16 15:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vlad Yasevich, Sridhar Samudrala, David S. Miller, linux-sctp,
netdev, linux-kern
From: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
The variable newinet is initialized twice to the same (side effect-free)
expression. Drop one initialization.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is:
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@forall@
idexpression *x;
identifier f!=ERR_PTR;
@@
x = f(...)
... when != x
(
x = f(...,<+...x...+>,...)
|
* x = f(...)
)
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
---
net/sctp/socket.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c
index 67fdac9..f6d1e59 100644
--- a/net/sctp/socket.c
+++ b/net/sctp/socket.c
@@ -6359,7 +6359,7 @@ void sctp_copy_sock(struct sock *newsk, struct sock *sk,
struct sctp_association *asoc)
{
struct inet_sock *inet = inet_sk(sk);
- struct inet_sock *newinet = inet_sk(newsk);
+ struct inet_sock *newinet;
newsk->sk_type = sk->sk_type;
newsk->sk_bound_dev_if = sk->sk_bound_dev_if;
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 4/9] net/sctp: Eliminate useless code
2010-01-16 15:58 ` Julia Lawall
@ 2010-01-20 18:10 ` Vlad Yasevich
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Vlad Yasevich @ 2010-01-20 18:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Julia Lawall
Cc: Sridhar Samudrala, David S. Miller, linux-sctp, netdev,
linux-kernel, kernel-janitors
Julia Lawall wrote:
> From: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
>
> The variable newinet is initialized twice to the same (side effect-free)
> expression. Drop one initialization.
>
> A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is:
> (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
>
> // <smpl>
> @forall@
> idexpression *x;
> identifier f!=ERR_PTR;
> @@
>
> x = f(...)
> ... when != x
> (
> x = f(...,<+...x...+>,...)
> |
> * x = f(...)
> )
> // </smpl>
>
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
>
> ---
> net/sctp/socket.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c
> index 67fdac9..f6d1e59 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/socket.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/socket.c
> @@ -6359,7 +6359,7 @@ void sctp_copy_sock(struct sock *newsk, struct sock *sk,
> struct sctp_association *asoc)
> {
> struct inet_sock *inet = inet_sk(sk);
> - struct inet_sock *newinet = inet_sk(newsk);
> + struct inet_sock *newinet;
>
> newsk->sk_type = sk->sk_type;
> newsk->sk_bound_dev_if = sk->sk_bound_dev_if;
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 4/9] net/sctp: Eliminate useless code
@ 2010-01-20 18:10 ` Vlad Yasevich
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Vlad Yasevich @ 2010-01-20 18:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Julia Lawall
Cc: Sridhar Samudrala, David S. Miller, linux-sctp, netdev,
linux-kernel, kernel-janitors
Julia Lawall wrote:
> From: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
>
> The variable newinet is initialized twice to the same (side effect-free)
> expression. Drop one initialization.
>
> A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is:
> (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
>
> // <smpl>
> @forall@
> idexpression *x;
> identifier f!=ERR_PTR;
> @@
>
> x = f(...)
> ... when != x
> (
> x = f(...,<+...x...+>,...)
> |
> * x = f(...)
> )
> // </smpl>
>
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
>
> ---
> net/sctp/socket.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c
> index 67fdac9..f6d1e59 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/socket.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/socket.c
> @@ -6359,7 +6359,7 @@ void sctp_copy_sock(struct sock *newsk, struct sock *sk,
> struct sctp_association *asoc)
> {
> struct inet_sock *inet = inet_sk(sk);
> - struct inet_sock *newinet = inet_sk(newsk);
> + struct inet_sock *newinet;
>
> newsk->sk_type = sk->sk_type;
> newsk->sk_bound_dev_if = sk->sk_bound_dev_if;
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 4/9] net/sctp: Eliminate useless code
2010-01-20 18:10 ` Vlad Yasevich
@ 2010-01-20 23:03 ` David Miller
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2010-01-20 23:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: vladislav.yasevich
Cc: julia, sri, linux-sctp, netdev, linux-kernel, kernel-janitors
From: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 13:10:10 -0500
>
>
> Julia Lawall wrote:
>> From: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
>>
>> The variable newinet is initialized twice to the same (side effect-free)
>> expression. Drop one initialization.
>>
>> A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is:
>> (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
>>
>> // <smpl>
>> @forall@
>> idexpression *x;
>> identifier f!=ERR_PTR;
>> @@
>>
>> x = f(...)
>> ... when != x
>> (
>> x = f(...,<+...x...+>,...)
>> |
>> * x = f(...)
>> )
>> // </smpl>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
>
> Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Julia, just like patch #3 this one had the missing final
line of the patch corrupting it, so you'll need to resubmit.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 4/9] net/sctp: Eliminate useless code
@ 2010-01-20 23:03 ` David Miller
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2010-01-20 23:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: vladislav.yasevich
Cc: julia, sri, linux-sctp, netdev, linux-kernel, kernel-janitors
From: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 13:10:10 -0500
>
>
> Julia Lawall wrote:
>> From: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
>>
>> The variable newinet is initialized twice to the same (side effect-free)
>> expression. Drop one initialization.
>>
>> A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is:
>> (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
>>
>> // <smpl>
>> @forall@
>> idexpression *x;
>> identifier f!=ERR_PTR;
>> @@
>>
>> x = f(...)
>> ... when != x
>> (
>> x = f(...,<+...x...+>,...)
>> |
>> * x = f(...)
>> )
>> // </smpl>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
>
> Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Julia, just like patch #3 this one had the missing final
line of the patch corrupting it, so you'll need to resubmit.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 4/9] net/sctp: Eliminate useless code
2010-01-20 23:03 ` David Miller
@ 2010-01-21 10:21 ` Julia Lawall
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Julia Lawall @ 2010-01-21 10:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Miller
Cc: vladislav.yasevich, sri, linux-sctp, netdev, linux-kernel,
kernel-janitors
From: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
The variable newinet is initialized twice to the same (side effect-free)
expression. Drop one initialization.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is:
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@forall@
idexpression *x;
identifier f!=ERR_PTR;
@@
x = f(...)
... when != x
(
x = f(...,<+...x...+>,...)
|
* x = f(...)
)
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
---
net/sctp/socket.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c
index 67fdac9..f6d1e59 100644
--- a/net/sctp/socket.c
+++ b/net/sctp/socket.c
@@ -6359,7 +6359,7 @@ void sctp_copy_sock(struct sock *newsk, struct sock *sk,
struct sctp_association *asoc)
{
struct inet_sock *inet = inet_sk(sk);
- struct inet_sock *newinet = inet_sk(newsk);
+ struct inet_sock *newinet;
newsk->sk_type = sk->sk_type;
newsk->sk_bound_dev_if = sk->sk_bound_dev_if;
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 4/9] net/sctp: Eliminate useless code
@ 2010-01-21 10:21 ` Julia Lawall
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Julia Lawall @ 2010-01-21 10:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Miller
Cc: vladislav.yasevich, sri, linux-sctp, netdev, linux-kernel,
kernel-janitors
From: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
The variable newinet is initialized twice to the same (side effect-free)
expression. Drop one initialization.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is:
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@forall@
idexpression *x;
identifier f!=ERR_PTR;
@@
x = f(...)
... when != x
(
x = f(...,<+...x...+>,...)
|
* x = f(...)
)
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
---
net/sctp/socket.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c
index 67fdac9..f6d1e59 100644
--- a/net/sctp/socket.c
+++ b/net/sctp/socket.c
@@ -6359,7 +6359,7 @@ void sctp_copy_sock(struct sock *newsk, struct sock *sk,
struct sctp_association *asoc)
{
struct inet_sock *inet = inet_sk(sk);
- struct inet_sock *newinet = inet_sk(newsk);
+ struct inet_sock *newinet;
newsk->sk_type = sk->sk_type;
newsk->sk_bound_dev_if = sk->sk_bound_dev_if;
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 4/9] net/sctp: Eliminate useless code
2010-01-20 23:03 ` David Miller
@ 2010-01-21 10:22 ` Julia Lawall
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Julia Lawall @ 2010-01-21 10:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Miller
Cc: vladislav.yasevich, sri, linux-sctp, netdev, linux-kernel,
kernel-janitors
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, David Miller wrote:
> From: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
> Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 13:10:10 -0500
>
> >
> >
> > Julia Lawall wrote:
> >> From: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
> >>
> >> The variable newinet is initialized twice to the same (side effect-free)
> >> expression. Drop one initialization.
> >>
> >> A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is:
> >> (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
> >>
> >> // <smpl>
> >> @forall@
> >> idexpression *x;
> >> identifier f!=ERR_PTR;
> >> @@
> >>
> >> x = f(...)
> >> ... when != x
> >> (
> >> x = f(...,<+...x...+>,...)
> >> |
> >> * x = f(...)
> >> )
> >> // </smpl>
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
> >
> > Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
>
> Julia, just like patch #3 this one had the missing final
> line of the patch corrupting it, so you'll need to resubmit.
I have generated and sent it again, but this time I don't see the problem.
If there is still a problem, perhaps you could send me back the patch you
received?
thanks,
julia
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 4/9] net/sctp: Eliminate useless code
@ 2010-01-21 10:22 ` Julia Lawall
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Julia Lawall @ 2010-01-21 10:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Miller
Cc: vladislav.yasevich, sri, linux-sctp, netdev, linux-kernel,
kernel-janitors
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, David Miller wrote:
> From: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
> Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 13:10:10 -0500
>
> >
> >
> > Julia Lawall wrote:
> >> From: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
> >>
> >> The variable newinet is initialized twice to the same (side effect-free)
> >> expression. Drop one initialization.
> >>
> >> A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is:
> >> (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
> >>
> >> // <smpl>
> >> @forall@
> >> idexpression *x;
> >> identifier f!=ERR_PTR;
> >> @@
> >>
> >> x = f(...)
> >> ... when != x
> >> (
> >> x = f(...,<+...x...+>,...)
> >> |
> >> * x = f(...)
> >> )
> >> // </smpl>
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
> >
> > Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
>
> Julia, just like patch #3 this one had the missing final
> line of the patch corrupting it, so you'll need to resubmit.
I have generated and sent it again, but this time I don't see the problem.
If there is still a problem, perhaps you could send me back the patch you
received?
thanks,
julia
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 4/9] net/sctp: Eliminate useless code
2010-01-21 10:22 ` Julia Lawall
@ 2010-01-21 10:43 ` David Miller
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2010-01-21 10:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: julia
Cc: vladislav.yasevich, sri, linux-sctp, netdev, linux-kernel,
kernel-janitors
From: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 11:22:38 +0100 (CET)
> On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, David Miller wrote:
>
>> From: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
>> Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 13:10:10 -0500
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > Julia Lawall wrote:
>> >> From: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
>> >>
>> >> The variable newinet is initialized twice to the same (side effect-free)
>> >> expression. Drop one initialization.
>> >>
>> >> A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is:
>> >> (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
>> >>
>> >> // <smpl>
>> >> @forall@
>> >> idexpression *x;
>> >> identifier f!=ERR_PTR;
>> >> @@
>> >>
>> >> x = f(...)
>> >> ... when != x
>> >> (
>> >> x = f(...,<+...x...+>,...)
>> >> |
>> >> * x = f(...)
>> >> )
>> >> // </smpl>
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
>> >
>> > Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
>>
>> Julia, just like patch #3 this one had the missing final
>> line of the patch corrupting it, so you'll need to resubmit.
>
> I have generated and sent it again, but this time I don't see the problem.
> If there is still a problem, perhaps you could send me back the patch you
> received?
You dropped Vlad' ACK in your re-submission.
I'll fix it up this time, but please accumulate ACK's when
resubmitting patches merely for the purpose of fixing some
technical submission problem.
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 4/9] net/sctp: Eliminate useless code
@ 2010-01-21 10:43 ` David Miller
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2010-01-21 10:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: julia
Cc: vladislav.yasevich, sri, linux-sctp, netdev, linux-kernel,
kernel-janitors
From: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 11:22:38 +0100 (CET)
> On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, David Miller wrote:
>
>> From: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
>> Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 13:10:10 -0500
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > Julia Lawall wrote:
>> >> From: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
>> >>
>> >> The variable newinet is initialized twice to the same (side effect-free)
>> >> expression. Drop one initialization.
>> >>
>> >> A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is:
>> >> (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
>> >>
>> >> // <smpl>
>> >> @forall@
>> >> idexpression *x;
>> >> identifier f!=ERR_PTR;
>> >> @@
>> >>
>> >> x = f(...)
>> >> ... when != x
>> >> (
>> >> x = f(...,<+...x...+>,...)
>> >> |
>> >> * x = f(...)
>> >> )
>> >> // </smpl>
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
>> >
>> > Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
>>
>> Julia, just like patch #3 this one had the missing final
>> line of the patch corrupting it, so you'll need to resubmit.
>
> I have generated and sent it again, but this time I don't see the problem.
> If there is still a problem, perhaps you could send me back the patch you
> received?
You dropped Vlad' ACK in your re-submission.
I'll fix it up this time, but please accumulate ACK's when
resubmitting patches merely for the purpose of fixing some
technical submission problem.
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 4/9] net/sctp: Eliminate useless code
2010-01-21 10:43 ` David Miller
@ 2010-01-21 10:49 ` Julia Lawall
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Julia Lawall @ 2010-01-21 10:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Miller
Cc: vladislav.yasevich, sri, linux-sctp, netdev, linux-kernel,
kernel-janitors
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010, David Miller wrote:
> From: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
> Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 11:22:38 +0100 (CET)
>
> > On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, David Miller wrote:
> >
> >> From: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
> >> Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 13:10:10 -0500
> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Julia Lawall wrote:
> >> >> From: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
> >> >>
> >> >> The variable newinet is initialized twice to the same (side effect-free)
> >> >> expression. Drop one initialization.
> >> >>
> >> >> A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is:
> >> >> (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
> >> >>
> >> >> // <smpl>
> >> >> @forall@
> >> >> idexpression *x;
> >> >> identifier f!=ERR_PTR;
> >> >> @@
> >> >>
> >> >> x = f(...)
> >> >> ... when != x
> >> >> (
> >> >> x = f(...,<+...x...+>,...)
> >> >> |
> >> >> * x = f(...)
> >> >> )
> >> >> // </smpl>
> >> >>
> >> >> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
> >> >
> >> > Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
> >>
> >> Julia, just like patch #3 this one had the missing final
> >> line of the patch corrupting it, so you'll need to resubmit.
> >
> > I have generated and sent it again, but this time I don't see the problem.
> > If there is still a problem, perhaps you could send me back the patch you
> > received?
>
> You dropped Vlad' ACK in your re-submission.
>
> I'll fix it up this time, but please accumulate ACK's when
> resubmitting patches merely for the purpose of fixing some
> technical submission problem.
>
> Thanks.
OK, I will keep that in mind.
Is the new one better than the old one? Because in my local copies, they
are the same...
julia
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 4/9] net/sctp: Eliminate useless code
@ 2010-01-21 10:49 ` Julia Lawall
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Julia Lawall @ 2010-01-21 10:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Miller
Cc: vladislav.yasevich, sri, linux-sctp, netdev, linux-kernel,
kernel-janitors
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010, David Miller wrote:
> From: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
> Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 11:22:38 +0100 (CET)
>
> > On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, David Miller wrote:
> >
> >> From: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
> >> Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 13:10:10 -0500
> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Julia Lawall wrote:
> >> >> From: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
> >> >>
> >> >> The variable newinet is initialized twice to the same (side effect-free)
> >> >> expression. Drop one initialization.
> >> >>
> >> >> A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is:
> >> >> (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
> >> >>
> >> >> // <smpl>
> >> >> @forall@
> >> >> idexpression *x;
> >> >> identifier f!=ERR_PTR;
> >> >> @@
> >> >>
> >> >> x = f(...)
> >> >> ... when != x
> >> >> (
> >> >> x = f(...,<+...x...+>,...)
> >> >> |
> >> >> * x = f(...)
> >> >> )
> >> >> // </smpl>
> >> >>
> >> >> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
> >> >
> >> > Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
> >>
> >> Julia, just like patch #3 this one had the missing final
> >> line of the patch corrupting it, so you'll need to resubmit.
> >
> > I have generated and sent it again, but this time I don't see the problem.
> > If there is still a problem, perhaps you could send me back the patch you
> > received?
>
> You dropped Vlad' ACK in your re-submission.
>
> I'll fix it up this time, but please accumulate ACK's when
> resubmitting patches merely for the purpose of fixing some
> technical submission problem.
>
> Thanks.
OK, I will keep that in mind.
Is the new one better than the old one? Because in my local copies, they
are the same...
julia
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 4/9] net/sctp: Eliminate useless code
2010-01-21 10:49 ` Julia Lawall
@ 2010-01-21 13:08 ` David Miller
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2010-01-21 13:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: julia
Cc: vladislav.yasevich, sri, linux-sctp, netdev, linux-kernel,
kernel-janitors
From: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 11:49:10 +0100 (CET)
> Is the new one better than the old one? Because in my local copies, they
> are the same...
The new one worked and I applied it.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 4/9] net/sctp: Eliminate useless code
@ 2010-01-21 13:08 ` David Miller
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2010-01-21 13:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: julia
Cc: vladislav.yasevich, sri, linux-sctp, netdev, linux-kernel,
kernel-janitors
From: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 11:49:10 +0100 (CET)
> Is the new one better than the old one? Because in my local copies, they
> are the same...
The new one worked and I applied it.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-01-21 13:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-01-16 15:58 [PATCH 4/9] net/sctp: Eliminate useless code Julia Lawall
2010-01-16 15:58 ` Julia Lawall
2010-01-16 15:58 ` Julia Lawall
2010-01-20 18:10 ` Vlad Yasevich
2010-01-20 18:10 ` Vlad Yasevich
2010-01-20 23:03 ` David Miller
2010-01-20 23:03 ` David Miller
2010-01-21 10:21 ` Julia Lawall
2010-01-21 10:21 ` Julia Lawall
2010-01-21 10:22 ` Julia Lawall
2010-01-21 10:22 ` Julia Lawall
2010-01-21 10:43 ` David Miller
2010-01-21 10:43 ` David Miller
2010-01-21 10:49 ` Julia Lawall
2010-01-21 10:49 ` Julia Lawall
2010-01-21 13:08 ` David Miller
2010-01-21 13:08 ` David Miller
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.