All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [RFC PATCH] scsi_transport_fc: Make sure commands are completed when rport is offline
@ 2010-03-09 11:27 Sarang Radke
  2010-03-09 14:41 ` James Smart
  2010-03-10  5:46 ` FUJITA Tomonori
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Sarang Radke @ 2010-03-09 11:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: fujita.tomonori, James.Bottomley, linux-scsi
  Cc: Andrew Vasquez, Lalit Chandivade, Giridhar Malavali, Ravi Anand

A panic is seen when an ELS BSG request is send for rport which is online, but goes offline before the request is processed.

Here are the details of the issue and the fix.

. The request handler routine fc_bsg_handler checks if the rport is not online and tries to end the request by calling blk_end_request.
. blk_end_request does not finish the request because it calls bidi_end_bidi_request with bidi_bytes = 0.
. After 60 sec. the timeout handler, fc_bsg_job_timeout is invoked for this unfinished command.
. A panic is seen in fc_bsg_job_timeout because req->special is NULL.
. req->special  would have been set by function fc_req_to_bsgjob, if the rport was online.
. The patch uses blk_end_request_all instead of blk_end_request which finishes the bidi request and timeout never happens.


-Thanks,
Sarang

Signed-off-by: Lalit Chandivade <lalit.chandivade@qlogic.com>
---
 drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c
index 79660ee..304e710 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c
@@ -3852,7 +3852,7 @@ fc_bsg_request_handler(struct request_queue *q, struct Scsi_Host *shost,
                if (rport && (rport->port_state != FC_PORTSTATE_ONLINE)) {
                        req->errors = -ENXIO;
                        spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
-                       blk_end_request(req, -ENXIO, blk_rq_bytes(req));
+                       blk_end_request_all(req, -ENXIO);
                        spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
                        continue;
                }
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFC PATCH] scsi_transport_fc: Make sure commands are completed when rport is offline
  2010-03-09 11:27 [RFC PATCH] scsi_transport_fc: Make sure commands are completed when rport is offline Sarang Radke
@ 2010-03-09 14:41 ` James Smart
  2010-03-10 10:03   ` Sarang Radke
  2010-03-10  5:46 ` FUJITA Tomonori
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: James Smart @ 2010-03-09 14:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sarang Radke
  Cc: fujita.tomonori, James.Bottomley, linux-scsi, Andrew Vasquez,
	Lalit Chandivade, Giridhar Malavali, Ravi Anand

I'm guessing your opening line describing the scenario wasn't correct. To 
match the patch, the request had to be issued when the rport is offline.
True ?

I think the change is fine, but the same change needs to be done a few lines 
lower when fc_req_to_bsgjob fails and blk_end_request() is called. Can you 
update the patch for this ?

-- james s


Sarang Radke wrote:
> A panic is seen when an ELS BSG request is send for rport which is online, but goes offline before the request is processed.
> 
> Here are the details of the issue and the fix.
> 
> . The request handler routine fc_bsg_handler checks if the rport is not online and tries to end the request by calling blk_end_request.
> . blk_end_request does not finish the request because it calls bidi_end_bidi_request with bidi_bytes = 0.
> . After 60 sec. the timeout handler, fc_bsg_job_timeout is invoked for this unfinished command.
> . A panic is seen in fc_bsg_job_timeout because req->special is NULL.
> . req->special  would have been set by function fc_req_to_bsgjob, if the rport was online.
> . The patch uses blk_end_request_all instead of blk_end_request which finishes the bidi request and timeout never happens.
> 
> 
> -Thanks,
> Sarang
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lalit Chandivade <lalit.chandivade@qlogic.com>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c
> index 79660ee..304e710 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c
> @@ -3852,7 +3852,7 @@ fc_bsg_request_handler(struct request_queue *q, struct Scsi_Host *shost,
>                 if (rport && (rport->port_state != FC_PORTSTATE_ONLINE)) {
>                         req->errors = -ENXIO;
>                         spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
> -                       blk_end_request(req, -ENXIO, blk_rq_bytes(req));
> +                       blk_end_request_all(req, -ENXIO);
>                         spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
>                         continue;
>                 }
> --
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFC PATCH] scsi_transport_fc: Make sure commands are completed when rport is offline
  2010-03-09 11:27 [RFC PATCH] scsi_transport_fc: Make sure commands are completed when rport is offline Sarang Radke
  2010-03-09 14:41 ` James Smart
@ 2010-03-10  5:46 ` FUJITA Tomonori
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: FUJITA Tomonori @ 2010-03-10  5:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: sarang.radke
  Cc: fujita.tomonori, James.Bottomley, linux-scsi, andrew.vasquez,
	lalit.chandivade, giridhar.malavali, ravi.anand

On Tue, 9 Mar 2010 05:27:51 -0600
Sarang Radke <sarang.radke@qlogic.com> wrote:

> A panic is seen when an ELS BSG request is send for rport which is online, but goes offline before the request is processed.
> 
> Here are the details of the issue and the fix.
> 
> . The request handler routine fc_bsg_handler checks if the rport is not online and tries to end the request by calling blk_end_request.
> . blk_end_request does not finish the request because it calls bidi_end_bidi_request with bidi_bytes = 0.
> . After 60 sec. the timeout handler, fc_bsg_job_timeout is invoked for this unfinished command.
> . A panic is seen in fc_bsg_job_timeout because req->special is NULL.
> . req->special  would have been set by function fc_req_to_bsgjob, if the rport was online.
> . The patch uses blk_end_request_all instead of blk_end_request which finishes the bidi request and timeout never happens.
> 
> 
> -Thanks,
> Sarang
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lalit Chandivade <lalit.chandivade@qlogic.com>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c
> index 79660ee..304e710 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c
> @@ -3852,7 +3852,7 @@ fc_bsg_request_handler(struct request_queue *q, struct Scsi_Host *shost,
>                 if (rport && (rport->port_state != FC_PORTSTATE_ONLINE)) {
>                         req->errors = -ENXIO;
>                         spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
> -                       blk_end_request(req, -ENXIO, blk_rq_bytes(req));
> +                       blk_end_request_all(req, -ENXIO);
>                         spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);

Yeah, looks fine to me. What we want to do here is just finishing the
request by force. But as James Smart pointed out, we need to replace
another blk_end_request too, I think.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* RE: [RFC PATCH] scsi_transport_fc: Make sure commands are completed when rport is offline
  2010-03-09 14:41 ` James Smart
@ 2010-03-10 10:03   ` Sarang Radke
  2010-03-10 14:50     ` James Smart
  2010-03-11  0:52     ` FUJITA Tomonori
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Sarang Radke @ 2010-03-10 10:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: James Smart
  Cc: fujita.tomonori, James.Bottomley, linux-scsi, Andrew Vasquez,
	Lalit Chandivade, Giridhar Malavali, Ravi Anand

James S./Fujita,

Thanks for the comments. The description of scenario was the one with which I noted the issue. But yes, the same would be true for any rport which is offline.

I am resending the patch with the suggested modifications.

-Thanks,
Sarang

>From 84a1f847c71382f67f97ea956b2283cf6d737340 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sarang Radke <sarang.radke@qlogic.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 12:20:29 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Make sure commands are completed for offline rport

blk_end_request doesn't complete a bidi request
successfully

The unfinished request eventually triggers a panic in
timeout handling routine fc_bsg_job_timeout as
req->special is NULL

Use blk_end_request_all to end the request unconditionally

Signed-off-by: Lalit Chandivade <lalit.chandivade@qlogic.com>
---
 drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c
index 79660ee..5819457 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c
@@ -3852,7 +3852,7 @@ fc_bsg_request_handler(struct request_queue *q, struct Scsi_Host *shost,
                if (rport && (rport->port_state != FC_PORTSTATE_ONLINE)) {
                        req->errors = -ENXIO;
                        spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
-                       blk_end_request(req, -ENXIO, blk_rq_bytes(req));
+                       blk_end_request_all(req, -ENXIO);
                        spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
                        continue;
                }
@@ -3862,7 +3862,7 @@ fc_bsg_request_handler(struct request_queue *q, struct Scsi_Host *shost,
                ret = fc_req_to_bsgjob(shost, rport, req);
                if (ret) {
                        req->errors = ret;
-                       blk_end_request(req, ret, blk_rq_bytes(req));
+                       blk_end_request_all(req, ret);
                        spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
                        continue;
                }
--
1.5.6


-----Original Message-----
From: James Smart [mailto:james.smart@Emulex.Com] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 8:11 PM
To: Sarang Radke
Cc: fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp; James.Bottomley@suse.de; linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org; Andrew Vasquez; Lalit Chandivade; Giridhar Malavali; Ravi Anand
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] scsi_transport_fc: Make sure commands are completed when rport is offline

I'm guessing your opening line describing the scenario wasn't correct. To 
match the patch, the request had to be issued when the rport is offline.
True ?

I think the change is fine, but the same change needs to be done a few lines 
lower when fc_req_to_bsgjob fails and blk_end_request() is called. Can you 
update the patch for this ?

-- james s


Sarang Radke wrote:
> A panic is seen when an ELS BSG request is send for rport which is online, but goes offline before the request is processed.
> 
> Here are the details of the issue and the fix.
> 
> . The request handler routine fc_bsg_handler checks if the rport is not online and tries to end the request by calling blk_end_request.
> . blk_end_request does not finish the request because it calls bidi_end_bidi_request with bidi_bytes = 0.
> . After 60 sec. the timeout handler, fc_bsg_job_timeout is invoked for this unfinished command.
> . A panic is seen in fc_bsg_job_timeout because req->special is NULL.
> . req->special  would have been set by function fc_req_to_bsgjob, if the rport was online.
> . The patch uses blk_end_request_all instead of blk_end_request which finishes the bidi request and timeout never happens.
> 

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFC PATCH] scsi_transport_fc: Make sure commands are completed when rport is offline
  2010-03-10 10:03   ` Sarang Radke
@ 2010-03-10 14:50     ` James Smart
  2010-03-11  0:52     ` FUJITA Tomonori
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: James Smart @ 2010-03-10 14:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sarang Radke
  Cc: fujita.tomonori, James.Bottomley, linux-scsi, Andrew Vasquez,
	Lalit Chandivade, Giridhar Malavali, Ravi Anand

Acked-by:  James Smart  <james.smart@emulex.com>

-- james s


Sarang Radke wrote:
> James S./Fujita,
> 
> Thanks for the comments. The description of scenario was the one with which I noted the issue. But yes, the same would be true for any rport which is offline.
> 
> I am resending the patch with the suggested modifications.
> 
> -Thanks,
> Sarang
> 
>>From 84a1f847c71382f67f97ea956b2283cf6d737340 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Sarang Radke <sarang.radke@qlogic.com>
> Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 12:20:29 -0500
> Subject: [PATCH] Make sure commands are completed for offline rport
> 
> blk_end_request doesn't complete a bidi request
> successfully
> 
> The unfinished request eventually triggers a panic in
> timeout handling routine fc_bsg_job_timeout as
> req->special is NULL
> 
> Use blk_end_request_all to end the request unconditionally
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lalit Chandivade <lalit.chandivade@qlogic.com>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c |    4 ++--
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c
> index 79660ee..5819457 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c
> @@ -3852,7 +3852,7 @@ fc_bsg_request_handler(struct request_queue *q, struct Scsi_Host *shost,
>                 if (rport && (rport->port_state != FC_PORTSTATE_ONLINE)) {
>                         req->errors = -ENXIO;
>                         spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
> -                       blk_end_request(req, -ENXIO, blk_rq_bytes(req));
> +                       blk_end_request_all(req, -ENXIO);
>                         spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
>                         continue;
>                 }
> @@ -3862,7 +3862,7 @@ fc_bsg_request_handler(struct request_queue *q, struct Scsi_Host *shost,
>                 ret = fc_req_to_bsgjob(shost, rport, req);
>                 if (ret) {
>                         req->errors = ret;
> -                       blk_end_request(req, ret, blk_rq_bytes(req));
> +                       blk_end_request_all(req, ret);
>                         spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
>                         continue;
>                 }
> --
> 1.5.6

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* RE: [RFC PATCH] scsi_transport_fc: Make sure commands are completed when rport is offline
  2010-03-10 10:03   ` Sarang Radke
  2010-03-10 14:50     ` James Smart
@ 2010-03-11  0:52     ` FUJITA Tomonori
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: FUJITA Tomonori @ 2010-03-11  0:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: sarang.radke
  Cc: james.smart, fujita.tomonori, James.Bottomley, linux-scsi,
	andrew.vasquez, lalit.chandivade, giridhar.malavali, ravi.anand

On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 04:03:04 -0600
Sarang Radke <sarang.radke@qlogic.com> wrote:

> James S./Fujita,
> 
> Thanks for the comments. The description of scenario was the one with which I noted the issue. But yes, the same would be true for any rport which is offline.
> 
> I am resending the patch with the suggested modifications.
> 
> -Thanks,
> Sarang
> 
> From 84a1f847c71382f67f97ea956b2283cf6d737340 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Sarang Radke <sarang.radke@qlogic.com>
> Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 12:20:29 -0500
> Subject: [PATCH] Make sure commands are completed for offline rport
> 
> blk_end_request doesn't complete a bidi request
> successfully
> 
> The unfinished request eventually triggers a panic in
> timeout handling routine fc_bsg_job_timeout as
> req->special is NULL
> 
> Use blk_end_request_all to end the request unconditionally
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lalit Chandivade <lalit.chandivade@qlogic.com>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c |    4 ++--
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Acked-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>


Thanks,

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-03-11  0:52 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-03-09 11:27 [RFC PATCH] scsi_transport_fc: Make sure commands are completed when rport is offline Sarang Radke
2010-03-09 14:41 ` James Smart
2010-03-10 10:03   ` Sarang Radke
2010-03-10 14:50     ` James Smart
2010-03-11  0:52     ` FUJITA Tomonori
2010-03-10  5:46 ` FUJITA Tomonori

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.