All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* OFF??? POINT-TO-POINT
@ 2010-08-24 17:36 Gáspár Lajos
  2010-08-24 17:55 ` Jan Engelhardt
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Gáspár Lajos @ 2010-08-24 17:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netfilter list

  Hi List.

My ISP set up this "IPVPN":

A location:

VLAN4093: ww.xx.yy.zz/30
  Public IP to Internet.
VLAN4094: 192.168.0.2/30
  Endpoint of "VPN" (a tunnel to B)

B location:
192.168.1.2/30 (No VLAN)

I thought that I can set up an point-to-point connection. But this is 
only available for PPP/SLIP/etc. "driven" interfaces.
I can set up the connection with the following lines in my interfaces file:

auto vlan4094
iface vlan4094 inet static
     address 192.168.0.2
     netmask 255.255.255.255
     pointopoint 192.168.1.2
     vlan_raw_device wan3
     up /sbin/ifconfig vlan4094 up arp
     up /sbin/route add -host 192.168.1.2 dev vlan4094
     down /sbin/route del -host 192.168.1.2 dev vlan4094

This works, however the interface just ignores the pointopoint line....

My question is maybe offtopic, but anyone knows a good reason why the 
pointopoint feature is not available on "normal" interfaces?

Thanx,

Swifty

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: OFF??? POINT-TO-POINT
  2010-08-24 17:36 OFF??? POINT-TO-POINT Gáspár Lajos
@ 2010-08-24 17:55 ` Jan Engelhardt
  2010-08-24 18:02   ` Gáspár Lajos
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jan Engelhardt @ 2010-08-24 17:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Gáspár Lajos; +Cc: netfilter list

On Tuesday 2010-08-24 19:36, Gáspár Lajos wrote:

> auto vlan4094
> iface vlan4094 inet static
>    address 192.168.0.2
>    netmask 255.255.255.255
>    pointopoint 192.168.1.2
>    vlan_raw_device wan3
>    up /sbin/ifconfig vlan4094 up arp
>    up /sbin/route add -host 192.168.1.2 dev vlan4094
>    down /sbin/route del -host 192.168.1.2 dev vlan4094
>
> This works, however the interface just ignores the pointopoint line....
>
> My question is maybe offtopic, but anyone knows a good reason why the
> pointopoint feature is not available on "normal" interfaces?

So what's the output of `ip addr`?



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: OFF??? POINT-TO-POINT
  2010-08-24 17:55 ` Jan Engelhardt
@ 2010-08-24 18:02   ` Gáspár Lajos
  2010-08-24 18:17     ` Jan Engelhardt
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Gáspár Lajos @ 2010-08-24 18:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jan Engelhardt, netfilter list


> So what's the output of `ip addr`?
>
21: vlan4094@wan3: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc 
noqueue state UP
     link/ether 00:19:e0:0b:ac:fc brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
     inet 192.168.0.2/32 scope global vlan4094
     inet6 fe80::219:e0ff:fe0b:acfc/64 scope link
        valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever

Swifty

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: OFF??? POINT-TO-POINT
  2010-08-24 18:02   ` Gáspár Lajos
@ 2010-08-24 18:17     ` Jan Engelhardt
  2010-08-24 18:45       ` Gáspár Lajos
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jan Engelhardt @ 2010-08-24 18:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Gáspár Lajos; +Cc: netfilter list

On Tuesday 2010-08-24 20:02, Gáspár Lajos wrote:

>
>> So what's the output of `ip addr`?
>>
> 21: vlan4094@wan3: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue
> state UP
>    link/ether 00:19:e0:0b:ac:fc brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>    inet 192.168.0.2/32 scope global vlan4094
>    inet6 fe80::219:e0ff:fe0b:acfc/64 scope link
>       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever

Tricky :)

And `ip route`?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: OFF??? POINT-TO-POINT
  2010-08-24 18:17     ` Jan Engelhardt
@ 2010-08-24 18:45       ` Gáspár Lajos
  2010-08-24 19:05         ` Jan Engelhardt
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Gáspár Lajos @ 2010-08-24 18:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jan Engelhardt; +Cc: netfilter list


>> 21: vlan4094@wan3:<BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP>  mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue
>> state UP
>>     link/ether 00:19:e0:0b:ac:fc brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>>     inet 192.168.0.2/32 scope global vlan4094
>>     inet6 fe80::219:e0ff:fe0b:acfc/64 scope link
>>        valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
> Tricky :)
>
> And `ip route`?
>
192.168.1.2 dev vlan4094  scope link


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: OFF??? POINT-TO-POINT
  2010-08-24 18:45       ` Gáspár Lajos
@ 2010-08-24 19:05         ` Jan Engelhardt
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jan Engelhardt @ 2010-08-24 19:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Gáspár Lajos; +Cc: netfilter list

On Tuesday 2010-08-24 20:45, Gáspár Lajos wrote:

>
>>> 21: vlan4094@wan3:<BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP>  mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue
>>> state UP
>>>    link/ether 00:19:e0:0b:ac:fc brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>>>    inet 192.168.0.2/32 scope global vlan4094
>>>    inet6 fe80::219:e0ff:fe0b:acfc/64 scope link
>>>       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
>> Tricky :)
>>
>> And `ip route`?
>>
> 192.168.1.2 dev vlan4094  scope link

So everything is correct.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-08-24 19:05 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-08-24 17:36 OFF??? POINT-TO-POINT Gáspár Lajos
2010-08-24 17:55 ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-08-24 18:02   ` Gáspár Lajos
2010-08-24 18:17     ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-08-24 18:45       ` Gáspár Lajos
2010-08-24 19:05         ` Jan Engelhardt

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.