All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Crash on kvm_iommu_map_pages
@ 2010-11-01 12:51 Jan Kiszka
  2010-11-01 12:57 ` Jan Kiszka
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kiszka @ 2010-11-01 12:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kvm; +Cc: Sheng Yang, Joerg Roedel

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3969 bytes --]

Hi again,

OK, I swapped those two lines in intel_iommu_attach_device [1], fixed
another warning in the wbinvd emulation, but now I'm about to give up.
This is freaky MMU stuff:


general protection fault: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
last sysfs file: /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1a.0/device
CPU 1 
Modules linked in: kvm_intel kvm bluetooth snd_pcm_oss snd_mixer_oss snd_seq snd_seq_device edd ip6t_REJECT nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 ip6table_raw xt_NOTRACK ipt_REJECT xt_state iptable_raw iptable_filter ip6table_mangle nf_conntrack_netbios_ns nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv4 ip_tables ip6table_filter ip6_tables x_tables ipv6 fuse loop mac80211 snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec ath9k_common ath9k_hw snd_hwdep snd_pcm snd_timer snd ath pcmcia cfg80211 sdhci_pci tpm_infineon sdhci yenta_socket firewire_ohci tpm_tis mmc_core soundcore e1000e sg pcmcia_rsrc tpm firewire_core iTCO_wdt video snd_page_alloc pcmcia_core i2c_i801 rfkill tpm_bios intel_agp output fujitsu_laptop iTCO_vendor_support i2c_core serio_raw pcspkr led_class joydev crc_itu_t button battery intel_gtt ac ext4 mbcache jbd2 crc16 sha256_generic aes_x86_64 aes_generic cbc dm_crypt linear sd_mod crc_t10dif dm_snapshot dm_mod fan processor ahci libahci ata_generi
c liba
ta scsi_mod thermal thermal_sys hwmon
Nov  1 13:19:11 mchn199C kernel:
Pid: 2248, comm: qemu-system-x86 Not tainted 2.6.36+ #12 FJNB211W/CELSIUS H700
RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8121de8c>]  [<ffffffff8121de8c>] pfn_to_dma_pte+0x73/0x190
RSP: 0018:ffff8800bd4bdb68  EFLAGS: 00010202
RAX: ffff1000bd4fe000 RBX: ffff1000bd4fec00 RCX: 0000000000000009
RDX: 0000000000000180 RSI: ffff88012a940938 RDI: 0000000000000202
RBP: ffff8800bd4bdba8 R08: ffffea00025ac2a0 R09: 0000000000000004
R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff880128dfee00
R13: 0000000000000002 R14: 00000000000f0000 R15: 0000000000000009
FS:  00007f4990d33710(0000) GS:ffff8800be680000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 002b ES: 002b CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000000001408000 CR3: 00000000bd7db000 CR4: 00000000000026e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Process qemu-system-x86 (pid: 2248, threadinfo ffff8800bd4bc000, task ffff88012a940000)
Stack:
ffff8800bd4bdb88 ffff8800ac378000 00000000000000d2 00000000000f0000
<0> ffff8800bd4bdce8 ffff8800ac2fc000 0000000000000003 00000000000f0001
<0> ffff8800bd4bdbb8 ffffffff8121dfbe ffff8800bd4bdbc8 ffffffff812a9573
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff8121dfbe>] intel_iommu_iova_to_phys+0x15/0x2a
[<ffffffff812a9573>] iommu_iova_to_phys+0x13/0x15
[<ffffffffa04e91d0>] kvm_iommu_map_pages+0x77/0x194 [kvm]
[<ffffffff8111404d>] ? __vmalloc_node+0x86/0x9b
[<ffffffffa04e30e2>] __kvm_set_memory_region+0x4e5/0x787 [kvm]
[<ffffffff81081ee8>] ? mark_held_locks+0x50/0x72
[<ffffffff8137c983>] ? mutex_lock_nested+0x325/0x34d
[<ffffffffa04e33bb>] kvm_set_memory_region+0x37/0x50 [kvm]
[<ffffffffa04e4c15>] kvm_vm_ioctl_set_memory_region+0x18/0x1a [kvm]
[<ffffffffa04e4e44>] kvm_vm_ioctl+0x22d/0x3b1 [kvm]
[<ffffffff811355aa>] ? fget_light+0x17b/0x31f
[<ffffffff81143bd7>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x4c6/0x507
[<ffffffff81135732>] ? fget_light+0x303/0x31f
[<ffffffff811355aa>] ? fget_light+0x17b/0x31f
[<ffffffff8137ebb9>] ? retint_swapgs+0x13/0x1b
[<ffffffff81143c6e>] sys_ioctl+0x56/0x7c
[<ffffffff81002df2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
Code: c7 31 db 47 8d 3c ff e9 1d 01 00 00 0f 0b 4c 89 f2 44 88 f9 48 d3 ea 81 e2 ff 01 00 00 41 83 fd 01 48 8d 1c d0 0f 84 0b 01 00 00 <f6> 03 03 0f 85 d8 00 00 00 41 8b 44 24 04 85 c0 79 08 65 8b 04 
RIP  [<ffffffff8121de8c>] pfn_to_dma_pte+0x73/0x190
RSP <ffff8800bd4bdb68>


Can anyone parse this? Is it Intel-specific or a generic issue? The
kernel is current kvm.git + unrelated patch + [1].

Jan

[1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.kvm.devel/61923


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 259 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: Crash on kvm_iommu_map_pages
  2010-11-01 12:51 Crash on kvm_iommu_map_pages Jan Kiszka
@ 2010-11-01 12:57 ` Jan Kiszka
  2010-11-01 13:21     ` Roedel, Joerg
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kiszka @ 2010-11-01 12:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kvm; +Cc: Sheng Yang, Joerg Roedel, Linux Kernel Mailing List

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4332 bytes --]

[ Forgot to CC LKML - maybe it's not KVM-specific.
  BTW, is anyone actually using current KVM device assigment on
  Intel? I'm starting to believe that can only very few lucky people...
]

Am 01.11.2010 13:51, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Hi again,
> 
> OK, I swapped those two lines in intel_iommu_attach_device [1], fixed
> another warning in the wbinvd emulation, but now I'm about to give up.
> This is freaky MMU stuff:
> 
> 
> general protection fault: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
> last sysfs file: /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1a.0/device
> CPU 1 
> Modules linked in: kvm_intel kvm bluetooth snd_pcm_oss snd_mixer_oss snd_seq snd_seq_device edd ip6t_REJECT nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 ip6table_raw xt_NOTRACK ipt_REJECT xt_state iptable_raw iptable_filter ip6table_mangle nf_conntrack_netbios_ns nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv4 ip_tables ip6table_filter ip6_tables x_tables ipv6 fuse loop mac80211 snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec ath9k_common ath9k_hw snd_hwdep snd_pcm snd_timer snd ath pcmcia cfg80211 sdhci_pci tpm_infineon sdhci yenta_socket firewire_ohci tpm_tis mmc_core soundcore e1000e sg pcmcia_rsrc tpm firewire_core iTCO_wdt video snd_page_alloc pcmcia_core i2c_i801 rfkill tpm_bios intel_agp output fujitsu_laptop iTCO_vendor_support i2c_core serio_raw pcspkr led_class joydev crc_itu_t button battery intel_gtt ac ext4 mbcache jbd2 crc16 sha256_generic aes_x86_64 aes_generic cbc dm_crypt linear sd_mod crc_t10dif dm_snapshot dm_mod fan processor ahci libahci ata_gene
ri
> c liba
> ta scsi_mod thermal thermal_sys hwmon
> Nov  1 13:19:11 mchn199C kernel:
> Pid: 2248, comm: qemu-system-x86 Not tainted 2.6.36+ #12 FJNB211W/CELSIUS H700
> RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8121de8c>]  [<ffffffff8121de8c>] pfn_to_dma_pte+0x73/0x190
> RSP: 0018:ffff8800bd4bdb68  EFLAGS: 00010202
> RAX: ffff1000bd4fe000 RBX: ffff1000bd4fec00 RCX: 0000000000000009
> RDX: 0000000000000180 RSI: ffff88012a940938 RDI: 0000000000000202
> RBP: ffff8800bd4bdba8 R08: ffffea00025ac2a0 R09: 0000000000000004
> R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff880128dfee00
> R13: 0000000000000002 R14: 00000000000f0000 R15: 0000000000000009
> FS:  00007f4990d33710(0000) GS:ffff8800be680000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> CS:  0010 DS: 002b ES: 002b CR0: 0000000080050033
> CR2: 0000000001408000 CR3: 00000000bd7db000 CR4: 00000000000026e0
> DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> Process qemu-system-x86 (pid: 2248, threadinfo ffff8800bd4bc000, task ffff88012a940000)
> Stack:
> ffff8800bd4bdb88 ffff8800ac378000 00000000000000d2 00000000000f0000
> <0> ffff8800bd4bdce8 ffff8800ac2fc000 0000000000000003 00000000000f0001
> <0> ffff8800bd4bdbb8 ffffffff8121dfbe ffff8800bd4bdbc8 ffffffff812a9573
> Call Trace:
> [<ffffffff8121dfbe>] intel_iommu_iova_to_phys+0x15/0x2a
> [<ffffffff812a9573>] iommu_iova_to_phys+0x13/0x15
> [<ffffffffa04e91d0>] kvm_iommu_map_pages+0x77/0x194 [kvm]
> [<ffffffff8111404d>] ? __vmalloc_node+0x86/0x9b
> [<ffffffffa04e30e2>] __kvm_set_memory_region+0x4e5/0x787 [kvm]
> [<ffffffff81081ee8>] ? mark_held_locks+0x50/0x72
> [<ffffffff8137c983>] ? mutex_lock_nested+0x325/0x34d
> [<ffffffffa04e33bb>] kvm_set_memory_region+0x37/0x50 [kvm]
> [<ffffffffa04e4c15>] kvm_vm_ioctl_set_memory_region+0x18/0x1a [kvm]
> [<ffffffffa04e4e44>] kvm_vm_ioctl+0x22d/0x3b1 [kvm]
> [<ffffffff811355aa>] ? fget_light+0x17b/0x31f
> [<ffffffff81143bd7>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x4c6/0x507
> [<ffffffff81135732>] ? fget_light+0x303/0x31f
> [<ffffffff811355aa>] ? fget_light+0x17b/0x31f
> [<ffffffff8137ebb9>] ? retint_swapgs+0x13/0x1b
> [<ffffffff81143c6e>] sys_ioctl+0x56/0x7c
> [<ffffffff81002df2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
> Code: c7 31 db 47 8d 3c ff e9 1d 01 00 00 0f 0b 4c 89 f2 44 88 f9 48 d3 ea 81 e2 ff 01 00 00 41 83 fd 01 48 8d 1c d0 0f 84 0b 01 00 00 <f6> 03 03 0f 85 d8 00 00 00 41 8b 44 24 04 85 c0 79 08 65 8b 04 
> RIP  [<ffffffff8121de8c>] pfn_to_dma_pte+0x73/0x190
> RSP <ffff8800bd4bdb68>
> 
> 
> Can anyone parse this? Is it Intel-specific or a generic issue? The
> kernel is current kvm.git + unrelated patch + [1].
> 
> Jan
> 
> [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.kvm.devel/61923
> 


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 259 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: Crash on kvm_iommu_map_pages
  2010-11-01 12:57 ` Jan Kiszka
@ 2010-11-01 13:21     ` Roedel, Joerg
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Roedel, Joerg @ 2010-11-01 13:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jan Kiszka; +Cc: kvm, Sheng Yang, Linux Kernel Mailing List

The registers rax and rbx contain non-canonical addresses (if
interpreted as pointers). The instruction where this happens is a mov so
I guess that the #GP is because of an non-canonical address.
Can you find out the code-line where this happens and the exact
assembler instruction? (haven't managed to decode the registers used).

	Joerg

On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 08:57:42AM -0400, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> [ Forgot to CC LKML - maybe it's not KVM-specific.
>   BTW, is anyone actually using current KVM device assigment on
>   Intel? I'm starting to believe that can only very few lucky people...
> ]
> 
> Am 01.11.2010 13:51, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > Hi again,
> > 
> > OK, I swapped those two lines in intel_iommu_attach_device [1], fixed
> > another warning in the wbinvd emulation, but now I'm about to give up.
> > This is freaky MMU stuff:
> > 
> > 
> > general protection fault: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
> > last sysfs file: /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1a.0/device
> > CPU 1 
> > Modules linked in: kvm_intel kvm bluetooth snd_pcm_oss snd_mixer_oss snd_seq snd_seq_device edd ip6t_REJECT nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 ip6table_raw xt_NOTRACK ipt_REJECT xt_state iptable_raw iptable_filter ip6table_mangle nf_conntrack_netbios_ns nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv4 ip_tables ip6table_filter ip6_tables x_tables ipv6 fuse loop mac80211 snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec ath9k_common ath9k_hw snd_hwdep snd_pcm snd_timer snd ath pcmcia cfg80211 sdhci_pci tpm_infineon sdhci yenta_socket firewire_ohci tpm_tis mmc_core soundcore e1000e sg pcmcia_rsrc tpm firewire_core iTCO_wdt video snd_page_alloc pcmcia_core i2c_i801 rfkill tpm_bios intel_agp output fujitsu_laptop iTCO_vendor_support i2c_core serio_raw pcspkr led_class joydev crc_itu_t button battery intel_gtt ac ext4 mbcache jbd2 crc16 sha256_generic aes_x86_64 aes_generic cbc dm_crypt linear sd_mod crc_t10dif dm_snapshot dm_mod fan processor ahci libahci ata_gene
> ri
> > c liba
> > ta scsi_mod thermal thermal_sys hwmon
> > Nov  1 13:19:11 mchn199C kernel:
> > Pid: 2248, comm: qemu-system-x86 Not tainted 2.6.36+ #12 FJNB211W/CELSIUS H700
> > RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8121de8c>]  [<ffffffff8121de8c>] pfn_to_dma_pte+0x73/0x190
> > RSP: 0018:ffff8800bd4bdb68  EFLAGS: 00010202
> > RAX: ffff1000bd4fe000 RBX: ffff1000bd4fec00 RCX: 0000000000000009
> > RDX: 0000000000000180 RSI: ffff88012a940938 RDI: 0000000000000202
> > RBP: ffff8800bd4bdba8 R08: ffffea00025ac2a0 R09: 0000000000000004
> > R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff880128dfee00
> > R13: 0000000000000002 R14: 00000000000f0000 R15: 0000000000000009
> > FS:  00007f4990d33710(0000) GS:ffff8800be680000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> > CS:  0010 DS: 002b ES: 002b CR0: 0000000080050033
> > CR2: 0000000001408000 CR3: 00000000bd7db000 CR4: 00000000000026e0
> > DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> > DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> > Process qemu-system-x86 (pid: 2248, threadinfo ffff8800bd4bc000, task ffff88012a940000)
> > Stack:
> > ffff8800bd4bdb88 ffff8800ac378000 00000000000000d2 00000000000f0000
> > <0> ffff8800bd4bdce8 ffff8800ac2fc000 0000000000000003 00000000000f0001
> > <0> ffff8800bd4bdbb8 ffffffff8121dfbe ffff8800bd4bdbc8 ffffffff812a9573
> > Call Trace:
> > [<ffffffff8121dfbe>] intel_iommu_iova_to_phys+0x15/0x2a
> > [<ffffffff812a9573>] iommu_iova_to_phys+0x13/0x15
> > [<ffffffffa04e91d0>] kvm_iommu_map_pages+0x77/0x194 [kvm]
> > [<ffffffff8111404d>] ? __vmalloc_node+0x86/0x9b
> > [<ffffffffa04e30e2>] __kvm_set_memory_region+0x4e5/0x787 [kvm]
> > [<ffffffff81081ee8>] ? mark_held_locks+0x50/0x72
> > [<ffffffff8137c983>] ? mutex_lock_nested+0x325/0x34d
> > [<ffffffffa04e33bb>] kvm_set_memory_region+0x37/0x50 [kvm]
> > [<ffffffffa04e4c15>] kvm_vm_ioctl_set_memory_region+0x18/0x1a [kvm]
> > [<ffffffffa04e4e44>] kvm_vm_ioctl+0x22d/0x3b1 [kvm]
> > [<ffffffff811355aa>] ? fget_light+0x17b/0x31f
> > [<ffffffff81143bd7>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x4c6/0x507
> > [<ffffffff81135732>] ? fget_light+0x303/0x31f
> > [<ffffffff811355aa>] ? fget_light+0x17b/0x31f
> > [<ffffffff8137ebb9>] ? retint_swapgs+0x13/0x1b
> > [<ffffffff81143c6e>] sys_ioctl+0x56/0x7c
> > [<ffffffff81002df2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
> > Code: c7 31 db 47 8d 3c ff e9 1d 01 00 00 0f 0b 4c 89 f2 44 88 f9 48 d3 ea 81 e2 ff 01 00 00 41 83 fd 01 48 8d 1c d0 0f 84 0b 01 00 00 <f6> 03 03 0f 85 d8 00 00 00 41 8b 44 24 04 85 c0 79 08 65 8b 04 
> > RIP  [<ffffffff8121de8c>] pfn_to_dma_pte+0x73/0x190
> > RSP <ffff8800bd4bdb68>
> > 
> > 
> > Can anyone parse this? Is it Intel-specific or a generic issue? The
> > kernel is current kvm.git + unrelated patch + [1].
> > 
> > Jan
> > 
> > [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.kvm.devel/61923
> > 
> 



-- 
AMD Operating System Research Center

Advanced Micro Devices GmbH Einsteinring 24 85609 Dornach
General Managers: Alberto Bozzo, Andrew Bowd
Registration: Dornach, Landkr. Muenchen; Registerger. Muenchen, HRB Nr. 43632


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: Crash on kvm_iommu_map_pages
@ 2010-11-01 13:21     ` Roedel, Joerg
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Roedel, Joerg @ 2010-11-01 13:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jan Kiszka; +Cc: kvm, Sheng Yang, Linux Kernel Mailing List

The registers rax and rbx contain non-canonical addresses (if
interpreted as pointers). The instruction where this happens is a mov so
I guess that the #GP is because of an non-canonical address.
Can you find out the code-line where this happens and the exact
assembler instruction? (haven't managed to decode the registers used).

	Joerg

On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 08:57:42AM -0400, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> [ Forgot to CC LKML - maybe it's not KVM-specific.
>   BTW, is anyone actually using current KVM device assigment on
>   Intel? I'm starting to believe that can only very few lucky people...
> ]
> 
> Am 01.11.2010 13:51, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > Hi again,
> > 
> > OK, I swapped those two lines in intel_iommu_attach_device [1], fixed
> > another warning in the wbinvd emulation, but now I'm about to give up.
> > This is freaky MMU stuff:
> > 
> > 
> > general protection fault: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
> > last sysfs file: /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1a.0/device
> > CPU 1 
> > Modules linked in: kvm_intel kvm bluetooth snd_pcm_oss snd_mixer_oss snd_seq snd_seq_device edd ip6t_REJECT nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 ip6table_raw xt_NOTRACK ipt_REJECT xt_state iptable_raw iptable_filter ip6table_mangle nf_conntrack_netbios_ns nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv4 ip_tables ip6table_filter ip6_tables x_tables ipv6 fuse loop mac80211 snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec ath9k_common ath9k_hw snd_hwdep snd_pcm snd_timer snd ath pcmcia cfg80211 sdhci_pci tpm_infineon sdhci yenta_socket firewire_ohci tpm_tis mmc_core soundcore e1000e sg pcmcia_rsrc tpm firewire_core iTCO_wdt video snd_page_alloc pcmcia_core i2c_i801 rfkill tpm_bios intel_agp output fujitsu_laptop iTCO_vendor_support i2c_core serio_raw pcspkr led_class joydev 
 crc_itu_t button battery intel_gtt ac ext4 mbcache jbd2 crc16 sha256_generic aes_x86_64 aes_generic cbc dm_crypt linear sd_mod crc_t10dif dm_snapshot dm_mod fan processor ahci libahci ata_gene
> ri
> > c liba
> > ta scsi_mod thermal thermal_sys hwmon
> > Nov  1 13:19:11 mchn199C kernel:
> > Pid: 2248, comm: qemu-system-x86 Not tainted 2.6.36+ #12 FJNB211W/CELSIUS H700
> > RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8121de8c>]  [<ffffffff8121de8c>] pfn_to_dma_pte+0x73/0x190
> > RSP: 0018:ffff8800bd4bdb68  EFLAGS: 00010202
> > RAX: ffff1000bd4fe000 RBX: ffff1000bd4fec00 RCX: 0000000000000009
> > RDX: 0000000000000180 RSI: ffff88012a940938 RDI: 0000000000000202
> > RBP: ffff8800bd4bdba8 R08: ffffea00025ac2a0 R09: 0000000000000004
> > R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff880128dfee00
> > R13: 0000000000000002 R14: 00000000000f0000 R15: 0000000000000009
> > FS:  00007f4990d33710(0000) GS:ffff8800be680000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> > CS:  0010 DS: 002b ES: 002b CR0: 0000000080050033
> > CR2: 0000000001408000 CR3: 00000000bd7db000 CR4: 00000000000026e0
> > DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> > DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> > Process qemu-system-x86 (pid: 2248, threadinfo ffff8800bd4bc000, task ffff88012a940000)
> > Stack:
> > ffff8800bd4bdb88 ffff8800ac378000 00000000000000d2 00000000000f0000
> > <0> ffff8800bd4bdce8 ffff8800ac2fc000 0000000000000003 00000000000f0001
> > <0> ffff8800bd4bdbb8 ffffffff8121dfbe ffff8800bd4bdbc8 ffffffff812a9573
> > Call Trace:
> > [<ffffffff8121dfbe>] intel_iommu_iova_to_phys+0x15/0x2a
> > [<ffffffff812a9573>] iommu_iova_to_phys+0x13/0x15
> > [<ffffffffa04e91d0>] kvm_iommu_map_pages+0x77/0x194 [kvm]
> > [<ffffffff8111404d>] ? __vmalloc_node+0x86/0x9b
> > [<ffffffffa04e30e2>] __kvm_set_memory_region+0x4e5/0x787 [kvm]
> > [<ffffffff81081ee8>] ? mark_held_locks+0x50/0x72
> > [<ffffffff8137c983>] ? mutex_lock_nested+0x325/0x34d
> > [<ffffffffa04e33bb>] kvm_set_memory_region+0x37/0x50 [kvm]
> > [<ffffffffa04e4c15>] kvm_vm_ioctl_set_memory_region+0x18/0x1a [kvm]
> > [<ffffffffa04e4e44>] kvm_vm_ioctl+0x22d/0x3b1 [kvm]
> > [<ffffffff811355aa>] ? fget_light+0x17b/0x31f
> > [<ffffffff81143bd7>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x4c6/0x507
> > [<ffffffff81135732>] ? fget_light+0x303/0x31f
> > [<ffffffff811355aa>] ? fget_light+0x17b/0x31f
> > [<ffffffff8137ebb9>] ? retint_swapgs+0x13/0x1b
> > [<ffffffff81143c6e>] sys_ioctl+0x56/0x7c
> > [<ffffffff81002df2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
> > Code: c7 31 db 47 8d 3c ff e9 1d 01 00 00 0f 0b 4c 89 f2 44 88 f9 48 d3 ea 81 e2 ff 01 00 00 41 83 fd 01 48 8d 1c d0 0f 84 0b 01 00 00 <f6> 03 03 0f 85 d8 00 00 00 41 8b 44 24 04 85 c0 79 08 65 8b 04 
> > RIP  [<ffffffff8121de8c>] pfn_to_dma_pte+0x73/0x190
> > RSP <ffff8800bd4bdb68>
> > 
> > 
> > Can anyone parse this? Is it Intel-specific or a generic issue? The
> > kernel is current kvm.git + unrelated patch + [1].
> > 
> > Jan
> > 
> > [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.kvm.devel/61923
> > 
> 



-- 
AMD Operating System Research Center

Advanced Micro Devices GmbH Einsteinring 24 85609 Dornach
General Managers: Alberto Bozzo, Andrew Bowd
Registration: Dornach, Landkr. Muenchen; Registerger. Muenchen, HRB Nr. 43632


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: Crash on kvm_iommu_map_pages
  2010-11-01 13:21     ` Roedel, Joerg
  (?)
@ 2010-11-01 13:25     ` Jan Kiszka
  2010-11-01 13:53       ` Roedel, Joerg
  -1 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kiszka @ 2010-11-01 13:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Roedel, Joerg; +Cc: kvm, Sheng Yang, Linux Kernel Mailing List

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5254 bytes --]

Am 01.11.2010 14:21, Roedel, Joerg wrote:
> The registers rax and rbx contain non-canonical addresses (if
> interpreted as pointers). The instruction where this happens is a mov so
> I guess that the #GP is because of an non-canonical address.
> Can you find out the code-line where this happens and the exact
> assembler instruction? (haven't managed to decode the registers used).

In pfn_to_dma_pte, line 710:

                if (!dma_pte_present(pte)) {
ffffffff8121de8c:       f6 03 03                testb  $0x3,(%rbx)
ffffffff8121de8f:       0f 85 d8 00 00 00       jne    ffffffff8121df6d <pfn_to_dma_pte+0x154>

The first instruction raises the fault.

Jan

> 
> 	Joerg
> 
> On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 08:57:42AM -0400, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> [ Forgot to CC LKML - maybe it's not KVM-specific.
>>   BTW, is anyone actually using current KVM device assigment on
>>   Intel? I'm starting to believe that can only very few lucky people...
>> ]
>>
>> Am 01.11.2010 13:51, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> Hi again,
>>>
>>> OK, I swapped those two lines in intel_iommu_attach_device [1], fixed
>>> another warning in the wbinvd emulation, but now I'm about to give up.
>>> This is freaky MMU stuff:
>>>
>>>
>>> general protection fault: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
>>> last sysfs file: /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1a.0/device
>>> CPU 1 
>>> Modules linked in: kvm_intel kvm bluetooth snd_pcm_oss snd_mixer_oss snd_seq snd_seq_device edd ip6t_REJECT nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 ip6table_raw xt_NOTRACK ipt_REJECT xt_state iptable_raw iptable_filter ip6table_mangle nf_conntrack_netbios_ns nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv4 ip_tables ip6table_filter ip6_tables x_tables ipv6 fuse loop mac80211 snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec ath9k_common ath9k_hw snd_hwdep snd_pcm snd_timer snd ath pcmcia cfg80211 sdhci_pci tpm_infineon sdhci yenta_socket firewire_ohci tpm_tis mmc_core soundcore e1000e sg pcmcia_rsrc tpm firewire_core iTCO_wdt video snd_page_alloc pcmcia_core i2c_i801 rfkill tpm_bios intel_agp output fujitsu_laptop iTCO_vendor_support i2c_core serio_raw pcspkr led_class joydev crc_itu_t button battery intel_gtt ac ext4 mbcache jbd2 crc16 sha256_generic aes_x86_64 aes_generic cbc dm_crypt linear sd_mod crc_t10dif dm_snapshot dm_mod fan processor ahci libahci ata_ge
ne
>> ri
>>> c liba
>>> ta scsi_mod thermal thermal_sys hwmon
>>> Nov  1 13:19:11 mchn199C kernel:
>>> Pid: 2248, comm: qemu-system-x86 Not tainted 2.6.36+ #12 FJNB211W/CELSIUS H700
>>> RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8121de8c>]  [<ffffffff8121de8c>] pfn_to_dma_pte+0x73/0x190
>>> RSP: 0018:ffff8800bd4bdb68  EFLAGS: 00010202
>>> RAX: ffff1000bd4fe000 RBX: ffff1000bd4fec00 RCX: 0000000000000009
>>> RDX: 0000000000000180 RSI: ffff88012a940938 RDI: 0000000000000202
>>> RBP: ffff8800bd4bdba8 R08: ffffea00025ac2a0 R09: 0000000000000004
>>> R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff880128dfee00
>>> R13: 0000000000000002 R14: 00000000000f0000 R15: 0000000000000009
>>> FS:  00007f4990d33710(0000) GS:ffff8800be680000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
>>> CS:  0010 DS: 002b ES: 002b CR0: 0000000080050033
>>> CR2: 0000000001408000 CR3: 00000000bd7db000 CR4: 00000000000026e0
>>> DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
>>> DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
>>> Process qemu-system-x86 (pid: 2248, threadinfo ffff8800bd4bc000, task ffff88012a940000)
>>> Stack:
>>> ffff8800bd4bdb88 ffff8800ac378000 00000000000000d2 00000000000f0000
>>> <0> ffff8800bd4bdce8 ffff8800ac2fc000 0000000000000003 00000000000f0001
>>> <0> ffff8800bd4bdbb8 ffffffff8121dfbe ffff8800bd4bdbc8 ffffffff812a9573
>>> Call Trace:
>>> [<ffffffff8121dfbe>] intel_iommu_iova_to_phys+0x15/0x2a
>>> [<ffffffff812a9573>] iommu_iova_to_phys+0x13/0x15
>>> [<ffffffffa04e91d0>] kvm_iommu_map_pages+0x77/0x194 [kvm]
>>> [<ffffffff8111404d>] ? __vmalloc_node+0x86/0x9b
>>> [<ffffffffa04e30e2>] __kvm_set_memory_region+0x4e5/0x787 [kvm]
>>> [<ffffffff81081ee8>] ? mark_held_locks+0x50/0x72
>>> [<ffffffff8137c983>] ? mutex_lock_nested+0x325/0x34d
>>> [<ffffffffa04e33bb>] kvm_set_memory_region+0x37/0x50 [kvm]
>>> [<ffffffffa04e4c15>] kvm_vm_ioctl_set_memory_region+0x18/0x1a [kvm]
>>> [<ffffffffa04e4e44>] kvm_vm_ioctl+0x22d/0x3b1 [kvm]
>>> [<ffffffff811355aa>] ? fget_light+0x17b/0x31f
>>> [<ffffffff81143bd7>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x4c6/0x507
>>> [<ffffffff81135732>] ? fget_light+0x303/0x31f
>>> [<ffffffff811355aa>] ? fget_light+0x17b/0x31f
>>> [<ffffffff8137ebb9>] ? retint_swapgs+0x13/0x1b
>>> [<ffffffff81143c6e>] sys_ioctl+0x56/0x7c
>>> [<ffffffff81002df2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
>>> Code: c7 31 db 47 8d 3c ff e9 1d 01 00 00 0f 0b 4c 89 f2 44 88 f9 48 d3 ea 81 e2 ff 01 00 00 41 83 fd 01 48 8d 1c d0 0f 84 0b 01 00 00 <f6> 03 03 0f 85 d8 00 00 00 41 8b 44 24 04 85 c0 79 08 65 8b 04 
>>> RIP  [<ffffffff8121de8c>] pfn_to_dma_pte+0x73/0x190
>>> RSP <ffff8800bd4bdb68>
>>>
>>>
>>> Can anyone parse this? Is it Intel-specific or a generic issue? The
>>> kernel is current kvm.git + unrelated patch + [1].
>>>
>>> Jan
>>>
>>> [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.kvm.devel/61923
>>>
>>
> 
> 
> 



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 259 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: Crash on kvm_iommu_map_pages
  2010-11-01 13:25     ` Jan Kiszka
@ 2010-11-01 13:53       ` Roedel, Joerg
  2010-11-01 14:22         ` Jan Kiszka
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Roedel, Joerg @ 2010-11-01 13:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jan Kiszka; +Cc: kvm, Sheng Yang, Linux Kernel Mailing List

On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 09:25:00AM -0400, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Am 01.11.2010 14:21, Roedel, Joerg wrote:
> > The registers rax and rbx contain non-canonical addresses (if
> > interpreted as pointers). The instruction where this happens is a mov so
> > I guess that the #GP is because of an non-canonical address.
> > Can you find out the code-line where this happens and the exact
> > assembler instruction? (haven't managed to decode the registers used).
> 
> In pfn_to_dma_pte, line 710:
> 
>                 if (!dma_pte_present(pte)) {
> ffffffff8121de8c:       f6 03 03                testb  $0x3,(%rbx)
> ffffffff8121de8f:       0f 85 d8 00 00 00       jne    ffffffff8121df6d <pfn_to_dma_pte+0x154>
> 
> The first instruction raises the fault.

Ok, so it seems that my understanding of the Code: field in the
crash-message was wrong :)
Anyway, the testb uses rbx as an address which has a non-canonical
value. This means the the address of 'pte' is invalid. Since rax also
contains a wrong address the 'parent' variable probably already contains
the wrong address. Does the attached patch help?

diff --git a/include/linux/dma_remapping.h b/include/linux/dma_remapping.h
index 5619f85..ca46f24 100644
--- a/include/linux/dma_remapping.h
+++ b/include/linux/dma_remapping.h
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
  */
 #define VTD_PAGE_SHIFT		(12)
 #define VTD_PAGE_SIZE		(1UL << VTD_PAGE_SHIFT)
-#define VTD_PAGE_MASK		(((u64)-1) << VTD_PAGE_SHIFT)
+#define VTD_PAGE_MASK		((((u64)-1) << VTD_PAGE_SHIFT) & ((1ULL << 52) - 1))
 #define VTD_PAGE_ALIGN(addr)	(((addr) + VTD_PAGE_SIZE - 1) & VTD_PAGE_MASK)
 
 #define DMA_PTE_READ (1)

-- 
AMD Operating System Research Center

Advanced Micro Devices GmbH Einsteinring 24 85609 Dornach
General Managers: Alberto Bozzo, Andrew Bowd
Registration: Dornach, Landkr. Muenchen; Registerger. Muenchen, HRB Nr. 43632


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: Crash on kvm_iommu_map_pages
  2010-11-01 13:53       ` Roedel, Joerg
@ 2010-11-01 14:22         ` Jan Kiszka
  2010-11-01 14:35           ` Joerg Roedel
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kiszka @ 2010-11-01 14:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Roedel, Joerg; +Cc: kvm, Sheng Yang, Linux Kernel Mailing List

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1869 bytes --]

Am 01.11.2010 14:53, Roedel, Joerg wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 09:25:00AM -0400, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Am 01.11.2010 14:21, Roedel, Joerg wrote:
>>> The registers rax and rbx contain non-canonical addresses (if
>>> interpreted as pointers). The instruction where this happens is a mov so
>>> I guess that the #GP is because of an non-canonical address.
>>> Can you find out the code-line where this happens and the exact
>>> assembler instruction? (haven't managed to decode the registers used).
>>
>> In pfn_to_dma_pte, line 710:
>>
>>                 if (!dma_pte_present(pte)) {
>> ffffffff8121de8c:       f6 03 03                testb  $0x3,(%rbx)
>> ffffffff8121de8f:       0f 85 d8 00 00 00       jne    ffffffff8121df6d <pfn_to_dma_pte+0x154>
>>
>> The first instruction raises the fault.
> 
> Ok, so it seems that my understanding of the Code: field in the
> crash-message was wrong :)
> Anyway, the testb uses rbx as an address which has a non-canonical
> value. This means the the address of 'pte' is invalid. Since rax also
> contains a wrong address the 'parent' variable probably already contains
> the wrong address. Does the attached patch help?
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/dma_remapping.h b/include/linux/dma_remapping.h
> index 5619f85..ca46f24 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dma_remapping.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dma_remapping.h
> @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
>   */
>  #define VTD_PAGE_SHIFT		(12)
>  #define VTD_PAGE_SIZE		(1UL << VTD_PAGE_SHIFT)
> -#define VTD_PAGE_MASK		(((u64)-1) << VTD_PAGE_SHIFT)
> +#define VTD_PAGE_MASK		((((u64)-1) << VTD_PAGE_SHIFT) & ((1ULL << 52) - 1))
>  #define VTD_PAGE_ALIGN(addr)	(((addr) + VTD_PAGE_SIZE - 1) & VTD_PAGE_MASK)
>  
>  #define DMA_PTE_READ (1)
> 

Crashes during early boot while initializing dmar. If you need the
trace, I could set up some debug console.

Jan


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 259 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: Crash on kvm_iommu_map_pages
  2010-11-01 14:22         ` Jan Kiszka
@ 2010-11-01 14:35           ` Joerg Roedel
  2010-11-01 15:29             ` Jan Kiszka
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Joerg Roedel @ 2010-11-01 14:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jan Kiszka; +Cc: Roedel, Joerg, kvm, Sheng Yang, Linux Kernel Mailing List

On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 03:22:15PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Am 01.11.2010 14:53, Roedel, Joerg wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 09:25:00AM -0400, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> Am 01.11.2010 14:21, Roedel, Joerg wrote:
> >>> The registers rax and rbx contain non-canonical addresses (if
> >>> interpreted as pointers). The instruction where this happens is a mov so
> >>> I guess that the #GP is because of an non-canonical address.
> >>> Can you find out the code-line where this happens and the exact
> >>> assembler instruction? (haven't managed to decode the registers used).
> >>
> >> In pfn_to_dma_pte, line 710:
> >>
> >>                 if (!dma_pte_present(pte)) {
> >> ffffffff8121de8c:       f6 03 03                testb  $0x3,(%rbx)
> >> ffffffff8121de8f:       0f 85 d8 00 00 00       jne    ffffffff8121df6d <pfn_to_dma_pte+0x154>
> >>
> >> The first instruction raises the fault.
> > 
> > Ok, so it seems that my understanding of the Code: field in the
> > crash-message was wrong :)
> > Anyway, the testb uses rbx as an address which has a non-canonical
> > value. This means the the address of 'pte' is invalid. Since rax also
> > contains a wrong address the 'parent' variable probably already contains
> > the wrong address. Does the attached patch help?
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/dma_remapping.h b/include/linux/dma_remapping.h
> > index 5619f85..ca46f24 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/dma_remapping.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/dma_remapping.h
> > @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
> >   */
> >  #define VTD_PAGE_SHIFT		(12)
> >  #define VTD_PAGE_SIZE		(1UL << VTD_PAGE_SHIFT)
> > -#define VTD_PAGE_MASK		(((u64)-1) << VTD_PAGE_SHIFT)
> > +#define VTD_PAGE_MASK		((((u64)-1) << VTD_PAGE_SHIFT) & ((1ULL << 52) - 1))
> >  #define VTD_PAGE_ALIGN(addr)	(((addr) + VTD_PAGE_SIZE - 1) & VTD_PAGE_MASK)
> >  
> >  #define DMA_PTE_READ (1)
> > 
> 
> Crashes during early boot while initializing dmar. If you need the
> trace, I could set up some debug console.

Hmm, no. This was only a guess. The VTD_PAGE_MASK does not mask out the
bits 52-63 of the pte. According to the VT-d spec it is allowed to set
these bits, some are marked as AVL and some have special meanings. If a
pte has one of these bits set the phys_addr calculated will be wrong and
the virt_addr calculated from it too (probably non-canonical, leading to
the GPF). 

Probably masking out these bits in dma_pte_addr helps. 

	Joerg


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: Crash on kvm_iommu_map_pages
  2010-11-01 14:35           ` Joerg Roedel
@ 2010-11-01 15:29             ` Jan Kiszka
  2010-11-01 16:37               ` Jan Kiszka
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kiszka @ 2010-11-01 15:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Joerg Roedel; +Cc: Roedel, Joerg, kvm, Sheng Yang, Linux Kernel Mailing List

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2662 bytes --]

Am 01.11.2010 15:35, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 03:22:15PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Am 01.11.2010 14:53, Roedel, Joerg wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 09:25:00AM -0400, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>> Am 01.11.2010 14:21, Roedel, Joerg wrote:
>>>>> The registers rax and rbx contain non-canonical addresses (if
>>>>> interpreted as pointers). The instruction where this happens is a mov so
>>>>> I guess that the #GP is because of an non-canonical address.
>>>>> Can you find out the code-line where this happens and the exact
>>>>> assembler instruction? (haven't managed to decode the registers used).
>>>>
>>>> In pfn_to_dma_pte, line 710:
>>>>
>>>>                 if (!dma_pte_present(pte)) {
>>>> ffffffff8121de8c:       f6 03 03                testb  $0x3,(%rbx)
>>>> ffffffff8121de8f:       0f 85 d8 00 00 00       jne    ffffffff8121df6d <pfn_to_dma_pte+0x154>
>>>>
>>>> The first instruction raises the fault.
>>>
>>> Ok, so it seems that my understanding of the Code: field in the
>>> crash-message was wrong :)
>>> Anyway, the testb uses rbx as an address which has a non-canonical
>>> value. This means the the address of 'pte' is invalid. Since rax also
>>> contains a wrong address the 'parent' variable probably already contains
>>> the wrong address. Does the attached patch help?
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/dma_remapping.h b/include/linux/dma_remapping.h
>>> index 5619f85..ca46f24 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/dma_remapping.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/dma_remapping.h
>>> @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
>>>   */
>>>  #define VTD_PAGE_SHIFT		(12)
>>>  #define VTD_PAGE_SIZE		(1UL << VTD_PAGE_SHIFT)
>>> -#define VTD_PAGE_MASK		(((u64)-1) << VTD_PAGE_SHIFT)
>>> +#define VTD_PAGE_MASK		((((u64)-1) << VTD_PAGE_SHIFT) & ((1ULL << 52) - 1))
>>>  #define VTD_PAGE_ALIGN(addr)	(((addr) + VTD_PAGE_SIZE - 1) & VTD_PAGE_MASK)
>>>  
>>>  #define DMA_PTE_READ (1)
>>>
>>
>> Crashes during early boot while initializing dmar. If you need the
>> trace, I could set up some debug console.
> 
> Hmm, no. This was only a guess. The VTD_PAGE_MASK does not mask out the
> bits 52-63 of the pte. According to the VT-d spec it is allowed to set
> these bits, some are marked as AVL and some have special meanings. If a
> pte has one of these bits set the phys_addr calculated will be wrong and
> the virt_addr calculated from it too (probably non-canonical, leading to
> the GPF). 
> 
> Probably masking out these bits in dma_pte_addr helps. 
> 

Nope. But I just noticed a fatal thinko in my fix to
intel_iommu_attach_device - probably that was the key. Need to boot the
test kernel...

Jan


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 259 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: Crash on kvm_iommu_map_pages
  2010-11-01 15:29             ` Jan Kiszka
@ 2010-11-01 16:37               ` Jan Kiszka
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kiszka @ 2010-11-01 16:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Joerg Roedel; +Cc: Roedel, Joerg, kvm, Sheng Yang, Linux Kernel Mailing List

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 406 bytes --]

Am 01.11.2010 16:29, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Nope. But I just noticed a fatal thinko in my fix to
> intel_iommu_attach_device - probably that was the key. Need to boot the
> test kernel...

That was indeed the reason for this GPF: I blindly swapped the
problematic lines, releasing the wrong page. Sorry, false alarm this
time, will send out the corrected intel_iommu_attach_device fix later.

Jan


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 259 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-11-01 16:37 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-11-01 12:51 Crash on kvm_iommu_map_pages Jan Kiszka
2010-11-01 12:57 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-11-01 13:21   ` Roedel, Joerg
2010-11-01 13:21     ` Roedel, Joerg
2010-11-01 13:25     ` Jan Kiszka
2010-11-01 13:53       ` Roedel, Joerg
2010-11-01 14:22         ` Jan Kiszka
2010-11-01 14:35           ` Joerg Roedel
2010-11-01 15:29             ` Jan Kiszka
2010-11-01 16:37               ` Jan Kiszka

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.