* [PATCH] linux 2.6.32: update from 2.6.32.9 to 2.6.32.25
@ 2010-11-16 19:26 Michael Smith
2010-11-16 21:16 ` Tom Rini
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Michael Smith @ 2010-11-16 19:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-devel
Signed-off-by: Michael Smith <msmith@cbnco.com>
---
recipes/linux/linux_2.6.32.bb | 6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/recipes/linux/linux_2.6.32.bb b/recipes/linux/linux_2.6.32.bb
index f1f4cc8..0122759 100644
--- a/recipes/linux/linux_2.6.32.bb
+++ b/recipes/linux/linux_2.6.32.bb
@@ -20,13 +20,13 @@ DEFAULT_PREFERENCE_bluepro = "1"
DEFAULT_PREFERENCE_topas910 = "1"
SRC_URI = "${KERNELORG_MIRROR}/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/linux-${PV}.tar.bz2;name=kernel \
- ${KERNELORG_MIRROR}/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/patch-${PV}.9.bz2;apply=yes;name=stablepatch \
+ ${KERNELORG_MIRROR}/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/patch-${PV}.25.bz2;apply=yes;name=stablepatch \
file://defconfig"
SRC_URI[kernel.md5sum] = "260551284ac224c3a43c4adac7df4879"
SRC_URI[kernel.sha256sum] = "5099786d80b8407d98a619df00209c2353517f22d804fdd9533b362adcb4504e"
-SRC_URI[stablepatch.md5sum] = "7f615dd3b4a3b19fb86e479996a2deb5"
-SRC_URI[stablepatch.sha256sum] = "8aeb15c31fb09c769f004c8dc51e29aa26be8e84d70db418af70ecefc463459a"
+SRC_URI[stablepatch.md5sum] = "d8fff54efff6c5f7b07e5370a5e9f119"
+SRC_URI[stablepatch.sha256sum] = "402f740b25c6e69344219164250a1181c74bbc8bb25149b3a0fa8d818706f32f"
SRC_URI_append_at91sam9g45ek = " \
file://at91/linux-2.6.32-001-configurable-nand-partitions.patch \
--
1.6.3.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] linux 2.6.32: update from 2.6.32.9 to 2.6.32.25
2010-11-16 19:26 [PATCH] linux 2.6.32: update from 2.6.32.9 to 2.6.32.25 Michael Smith
@ 2010-11-16 21:16 ` Tom Rini
2010-11-16 21:43 ` Michael Smith
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Tom Rini @ 2010-11-16 21:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-devel
On 11/16/2010 12:26 PM, Michael Smith wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Michael Smith<msmith@cbnco.com>
While I like this conceptually, did you confirm that all of the machines
that have additional patches still patch cleanly?
> ---
> recipes/linux/linux_2.6.32.bb | 6 +++---
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/recipes/linux/linux_2.6.32.bb b/recipes/linux/linux_2.6.32.bb
> index f1f4cc8..0122759 100644
> --- a/recipes/linux/linux_2.6.32.bb
> +++ b/recipes/linux/linux_2.6.32.bb
> @@ -20,13 +20,13 @@ DEFAULT_PREFERENCE_bluepro = "1"
> DEFAULT_PREFERENCE_topas910 = "1"
>
> SRC_URI = "${KERNELORG_MIRROR}/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/linux-${PV}.tar.bz2;name=kernel \
> - ${KERNELORG_MIRROR}/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/patch-${PV}.9.bz2;apply=yes;name=stablepatch \
> + ${KERNELORG_MIRROR}/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/patch-${PV}.25.bz2;apply=yes;name=stablepatch \
> file://defconfig"
>
> SRC_URI[kernel.md5sum] = "260551284ac224c3a43c4adac7df4879"
> SRC_URI[kernel.sha256sum] = "5099786d80b8407d98a619df00209c2353517f22d804fdd9533b362adcb4504e"
> -SRC_URI[stablepatch.md5sum] = "7f615dd3b4a3b19fb86e479996a2deb5"
> -SRC_URI[stablepatch.sha256sum] = "8aeb15c31fb09c769f004c8dc51e29aa26be8e84d70db418af70ecefc463459a"
> +SRC_URI[stablepatch.md5sum] = "d8fff54efff6c5f7b07e5370a5e9f119"
> +SRC_URI[stablepatch.sha256sum] = "402f740b25c6e69344219164250a1181c74bbc8bb25149b3a0fa8d818706f32f"
>
> SRC_URI_append_at91sam9g45ek = " \
> file://at91/linux-2.6.32-001-configurable-nand-partitions.patch \
--
Tom Rini
Mentor Graphics Corporation
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] linux 2.6.32: update from 2.6.32.9 to 2.6.32.25
2010-11-16 21:16 ` Tom Rini
@ 2010-11-16 21:43 ` Michael Smith
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Michael Smith @ 2010-11-16 21:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-devel, Matthias Günther
Tom Rini wrote:
>
> While I like this conceptually, did you confirm that all of the machines
> that have additional patches still patch cleanly?
I did not, but should have.
All patches still apply except for eee701 (applied upstream) and
topas910 (some hunks rejected, some applied upstream).
Matthias, would you be able to rebase your topas910 patch against 2.6.32.25?
Thanks,
Mike
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-11-16 21:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-11-16 19:26 [PATCH] linux 2.6.32: update from 2.6.32.9 to 2.6.32.25 Michael Smith
2010-11-16 21:16 ` Tom Rini
2010-11-16 21:43 ` Michael Smith
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.