All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* which branch is recommanded to use for pvops dom0?
@ 2011-01-25  1:33 Zhang, Yang Z
  2011-01-25  1:45 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Zhang, Yang Z @ 2011-01-25  1:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge; +Cc: xen-devel

Hi jeremy
Now we use xen/stable-2.6.32.x for testing. But I found the xen/stable-2.6.33.x is ready? Should we move to it?

best regards
yang

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: which branch is recommanded to use for pvops dom0?
  2011-01-25  1:33 which branch is recommanded to use for pvops dom0? Zhang, Yang Z
@ 2011-01-25  1:45 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
  2011-01-25  1:59   ` which branch is recommended " Zhang, Yang Z
  2011-01-25 13:25   ` Re: which branch is recommanded " Gianni Tedesco
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge @ 2011-01-25  1:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Zhang, Yang Z; +Cc: xen-devel

On 01/24/2011 05:33 PM, Zhang, Yang Z wrote:
> Hi jeremy
> Now we use xen/stable-2.6.32.x for testing. But I found the xen/stable-2.6.33.x is ready? Should we move to it?
>

There is no xen/stable-2.6.33; there might have been at one point, but
it was never more than a placeholder.

What kind of work are you doing?

Mainline Linux contains a lot of dom0 support now, but not quite enough
to usefully run a domain.  We're in the middle of preparing a 2.6.38-rc
based branch which will be more complete.

xen/stable-2.6.32.x is still the most feature-complete branch, but it is
more or less in a maintenance state, and will probably only get bugfix
updates.

    J

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* RE: which branch is recommended to use for pvops dom0?
  2011-01-25  1:45 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
@ 2011-01-25  1:59   ` Zhang, Yang Z
  2011-01-25 13:25   ` Re: which branch is recommanded " Gianni Tedesco
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Zhang, Yang Z @ 2011-01-25  1:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge; +Cc: xen-devel

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge [mailto:jeremy@goop.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 9:45 AM
> To: Zhang, Yang Z
> Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> Subject: Re: which branch is recommanded to use for pvops dom0?
> 
> On 01/24/2011 05:33 PM, Zhang, Yang Z wrote:
> > Hi jeremy
> > Now we use xen/stable-2.6.32.x for testing. But I found the
> xen/stable-2.6.33.x is ready? Should we move to it?
> >
> 
> There is no xen/stable-2.6.33; there might have been at one point, but
> it was never more than a placeholder.
> 
> What kind of work are you doing?
I am focus on the validation with hvm guest. 

> 

> Mainline Linux contains a lot of dom0 support now, but not quite enough
> to usefully run a domain.  We're in the middle of preparing a 2.6.38-rc
> based branch which will be more complete.
> 
> xen/stable-2.6.32.x is still the most feature-complete branch, but it is
> more or less in a maintenance state, and will probably only get bugfix
> updates.
Ok, I see. If there have any new recommended candidate, please let me know. Thanks.

best regards
yang

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: Re: which branch is recommanded to use for pvops dom0?
  2011-01-25  1:45 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
  2011-01-25  1:59   ` which branch is recommended " Zhang, Yang Z
@ 2011-01-25 13:25   ` Gianni Tedesco
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Gianni Tedesco @ 2011-01-25 13:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge; +Cc: Zhang, Yang Z, xen-devel

On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 01:45 +0000, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> On 01/24/2011 05:33 PM, Zhang, Yang Z wrote:
> > Hi jeremy
> > Now we use xen/stable-2.6.32.x for testing. But I found the xen/stable-2.6.33.x is ready? Should we move to it?
> >
> 
> There is no xen/stable-2.6.33; there might have been at one point, but
> it was never more than a placeholder.
> 
> What kind of work are you doing?
> 
> Mainline Linux contains a lot of dom0 support now, but not quite enough
> to usefully run a domain.  We're in the middle of preparing a 2.6.38-rc
> based branch which will be more complete.
> 
> xen/stable-2.6.32.x is still the most feature-complete branch, but it is
> more or less in a maintenance state, and will probably only get bugfix
> updates.

Speaking of which I now have a reliable repro for "d0:v0 unhandled page
fault (ec=0000)" early-boot crash.

Go in to a file in the kernel and add the following:

unsigned char foo_bar_baz_furfuu_quux[1<<20];

Turns out that it is related to kernel image size after all. The crash
happens regardless of which section the big variable gets linked in to
(ie. text or data).

Gianni

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-01-25 13:25 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-01-25  1:33 which branch is recommanded to use for pvops dom0? Zhang, Yang Z
2011-01-25  1:45 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-01-25  1:59   ` which branch is recommended " Zhang, Yang Z
2011-01-25 13:25   ` Re: which branch is recommanded " Gianni Tedesco

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.