All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
To: Yoshiaki Tamura <tamura.yoshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
	Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [0.14] Queue of 0.14 patches/pull?
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 13:00:54 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D4293D6.2080802@msgid.tls.msk.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=H-Uc8Js7-PV_ceCZ99wiy6DVDvH1TqqyDhJL+@mail.gmail.com>

28.01.2011 11:06, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote:
[]
> I would like Kemari to be included for 0.14.  Thanks to many
> valuable comments from various reviewers, it got better than
> ever, I believe.  For those who may object, it wouldn't affect
> any functions including live migration unless one turns it on.
> Besides, it is a good application of live migration.  By having
> merged, I would be able to focus on increasing functionality and
> optimization.

It's somewhat unexpected to see merge request for any new
functionality into a "stable" branch.  Having nothing bad
against Kemari, I still think we shouldn't include any new
functionality into 0.14, which were planned to be released
before new year... ;)

I mean, if it were not merged so far, for reasons that can
be discussed separately etc, regardless of its good shape
and so on... let's don't do any last-minute merges.

Mergeing it to a development branch is entirely another
question.

/mjt

  reply	other threads:[~2011-01-28 10:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-27  8:29 [Qemu-devel] [0.14] Queue of 0.14 patches/pull? Paolo Bonzini
2011-01-27 10:26 ` [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0.14] spice + usb Gerd Hoffmann
2011-01-27 12:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [0.14] Queue of 0.14 patches/pull? Markus Armbruster
2011-01-27 12:42   ` Kevin Wolf
2011-01-27 15:13   ` Markus Armbruster
2011-01-27 16:30 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-27 16:44   ` [Qemu-devel] [PING 0.14] fix crash when a read handler calls qemu_set_fd_handler2() Rick Vernam
2011-01-27 17:14     ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-27 19:50       ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-01-28  0:38         ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-27 16:51   ` [Qemu-devel] [PING 0.14] seabios virtio bug Rick Vernam
2011-01-27 17:12     ` [Qemu-devel] " Paolo Bonzini
2011-01-27 17:30       ` Gleb Natapov
2011-01-28  7:51   ` [Qemu-devel] [0.14] Queue of 0.14 patches/pull? Gleb Natapov
2011-01-27 18:22 ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-01-28  8:06   ` Yoshiaki Tamura
2011-01-28 10:00     ` Michael Tokarev [this message]
2011-01-28 13:33       ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-01-28 14:21         ` Yoshiaki Tamura
2011-02-02  9:31           ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-02-03  4:44             ` Yoshiaki Tamura
2011-01-28 16:48         ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-29 13:43           ` Yoshiaki Tamura
2011-01-28  6:43 ` [Qemu-devel] " Amit Shah
2011-02-02 19:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [PING 0.14] Missing patches (mostly fixes) Stefan Weil
2011-02-02 21:25   ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-02-03  7:00   ` Riku Voipio
2011-02-03 10:05   ` [Qemu-devel] " Markus Armbruster
2011-02-04 12:30   ` Anthony Liguori
2011-02-04 12:37     ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-02-04 14:40     ` Alexander Graf
2011-02-04 15:27     ` Markus Armbruster
2011-02-04 15:38       ` Anthony Liguori
2011-02-04 16:42       ` Luiz Capitulino
2011-02-04 17:18       ` Stefan Weil
2011-02-04 17:21         ` Anthony Liguori
2011-02-04 17:36           ` Stefan Weil
2011-02-04 17:59             ` Anthony Liguori
2011-02-07 18:54             ` Luiz Capitulino
2011-02-07 19:18               ` Stefan Weil
2011-02-16 20:26       ` Stefan Weil
2011-02-16 20:39         ` Markus Armbruster
2011-02-04 15:45     ` malc
2011-02-05 19:23     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-02-05 19:34     ` riku voipio
2011-02-23 21:50     ` Stefan Weil

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D4293D6.2080802@msgid.tls.msk.ru \
    --to=mjt@tls.msk.ru \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=tamura.yoshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.