All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
	quintela@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: KVM call agenda for Feb 1
Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 13:40:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D47FF39.7060700@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D472C0A.1070505@codemonkey.ws>

On 01/31/2011 10:39 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 01/31/2011 12:10 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2011-01-31 11:02, Juan Quintela wrote:
>>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested incovering.
>>>
>> o KVM upstream merge: status, plans, coordination
>
> o QMP support status for 0.14. Luiz and I already chatted about it today
> but would be good to discuss in the call just to see if anyone has
> opinions. Basically, declare it fully supported with a few minor caveats
> (like human-monitor-passthrough is no more supported than the actual
> monitor and recommendations about how to deal with devices in the device
> tree).
>
> Reminder: tomorrow is 0.14 stable fork.

Then I may add to the topics: pings of already-posted 0.14 patches. :)

Paolo

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	quintela@redhat.com
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for Feb 1
Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 13:40:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D47FF39.7060700@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D472C0A.1070505@codemonkey.ws>

On 01/31/2011 10:39 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 01/31/2011 12:10 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2011-01-31 11:02, Juan Quintela wrote:
>>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested incovering.
>>>
>> o KVM upstream merge: status, plans, coordination
>
> o QMP support status for 0.14. Luiz and I already chatted about it today
> but would be good to discuss in the call just to see if anyone has
> opinions. Basically, declare it fully supported with a few minor caveats
> (like human-monitor-passthrough is no more supported than the actual
> monitor and recommendations about how to deal with devices in the device
> tree).
>
> Reminder: tomorrow is 0.14 stable fork.

Then I may add to the topics: pings of already-posted 0.14 patches. :)

Paolo

  reply	other threads:[~2011-02-01 12:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-31 10:02 KVM call agenda for Feb 1 Juan Quintela
2011-01-31 10:02 ` [Qemu-devel] " Juan Quintela
2011-01-31 18:10 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-01-31 18:10   ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
2011-01-31 21:39   ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-31 21:39     ` [Qemu-devel] " Anthony Liguori
2011-02-01 12:40     ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2011-02-01 12:40       ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-02-01 12:53     ` Luiz Capitulino
2011-02-01 12:56       ` Luiz Capitulino
2011-02-01 14:37         ` Alexander Graf
2011-02-01 14:37           ` Alexander Graf
2011-02-01 15:05           ` Anthony Liguori
2011-02-01 15:05             ` Anthony Liguori
2011-02-01 15:27             ` Alexander Graf
2011-02-01 15:27               ` Alexander Graf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D47FF39.7060700@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
    --cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=quintela@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.