* NFSD Secinfo no name
@ 2011-05-06 18:24 Bryan Schumaker
2011-05-10 0:59 ` J. Bruce Fields
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Bryan Schumaker @ 2011-05-06 18:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: J. Bruce Fields, linux-nfs
Hi Bruce,
On the call yesterday you asked me to double check that secinfo no name still works in NFSD. It does still work for me.
- Bryan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: NFSD Secinfo no name
2011-05-06 18:24 NFSD Secinfo no name Bryan Schumaker
@ 2011-05-10 0:59 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-05-10 12:39 ` Bryan Schumaker
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: J. Bruce Fields @ 2011-05-10 0:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bryan Schumaker; +Cc: linux-nfs
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 02:24:39PM -0400, Bryan Schumaker wrote:
> Hi Bruce,
>
> On the call yesterday you asked me to double check that secinfo no name still works in NFSD. It does still work for me.
My real question was whether the bug you reported here:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-nfs&m=130192462122087&w=2
appears to have been fixed (in my for-2.6.40 branch) to your
satisfaction?
--b.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: NFSD Secinfo no name
2011-05-10 0:59 ` J. Bruce Fields
@ 2011-05-10 12:39 ` Bryan Schumaker
2011-05-10 15:53 ` J. Bruce Fields
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Bryan Schumaker @ 2011-05-10 12:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: J. Bruce Fields; +Cc: linux-nfs
On 05/09/2011 08:59 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 02:24:39PM -0400, Bryan Schumaker wrote:
>> Hi Bruce,
>>
>> On the call yesterday you asked me to double check that secinfo no name still works in NFSD. It does still work for me.
>
> My real question was whether the bug you reported here:
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-nfs&m=130192462122087&w=2
>
> appears to have been fixed (in my for-2.6.40 branch) to your
> satisfaction?
Yes it has. That's what I was trying to answer, sorry if I wasn't clear.
>
> --b.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: NFSD Secinfo no name
2011-05-10 12:39 ` Bryan Schumaker
@ 2011-05-10 15:53 ` J. Bruce Fields
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: J. Bruce Fields @ 2011-05-10 15:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bryan Schumaker; +Cc: linux-nfs
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 08:39:28AM -0400, Bryan Schumaker wrote:
> On 05/09/2011 08:59 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 02:24:39PM -0400, Bryan Schumaker wrote:
> >> Hi Bruce,
> >>
> >> On the call yesterday you asked me to double check that secinfo no name still works in NFSD. It does still work for me.
> >
> > My real question was whether the bug you reported here:
> >
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-nfs&m=130192462122087&w=2
> >
> > appears to have been fixed (in my for-2.6.40 branch) to your
> > satisfaction?
>
> Yes it has. That's what I was trying to answer, sorry if I wasn't clear.
Oh, sorry, I misundertood then. Got it, thanks!
--b.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-05-10 15:53 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-05-06 18:24 NFSD Secinfo no name Bryan Schumaker
2011-05-10 0:59 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-05-10 12:39 ` Bryan Schumaker
2011-05-10 15:53 ` J. Bruce Fields
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.