Re: [PATCH 0/2] sparc32,leon: PCI patches

[Daniel Hellstrom <daniel@gaisler.com>]

David Miller wrote:

>From: Daniel Hellstrom <daniel@gaisler.com>
>Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 16:22:33 +0200
>
>  
>
>>I agree that it is a better solution in that case and in other cases
>>too. The problem will be for me to write a PCI Library in the limited
>>context of the PROM, it is much more complex that writing a PCI host
>>driver. The non-free PCI specification alone is heavy, compatibility
>>between PCI revisions and then there is the bridge
>>specification... ugg, I will probably have to leave that to the next
>>generation :)
>>    
>>
>
>I guess if it's really that bad we can merge your PCI changes for
>now, please resubmit them.
>  
>
Thanks, it means a lot to us.

>Julian:
>When I looked at this earlier, I was thinking that we might want to
>introduce a new KConfig variable, maybe CONFIG_LEON_PCI, to hide all
>this stuff behind so we don't have to do any complicated ifdefery or
>change any existing ifdefs.

I will add a PCIC and a LEON_PCI Kconfig option that depends on 
!LEON/LEON and PCI, as julian/sam suggests. I'm busy at the moment with 
other stuff it a pity these problem wasn't brought forward until now, is 
the merge window open until the end of the week?

Thanks,
Daniel