Re: [PATCH 3/5] oom: oom-killer don't use proportion of system-ram internally

[KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>]

> ok, removed.

I'm sorry. previous patch has white space damage.
Let's retry send it.


>From 3dda8863e5acdba7a714f0e7506fae931865c442 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 10:43:49 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] remove unrelated comments

Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
 mm/oom_kill.c |    2 --
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
index ec075cc..b01fa64 100644
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -184,8 +184,6 @@ unsigned long oom_badness(struct task_struct *p, struct mem_cgroup *mem,
 	/*
 	 * Root processes get 3% bonus, just like the __vm_enough_memory()
 	 * implementation used by LSMs.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: Too large bonus, example, if the system have tera-bytes memory..
 	 */
 	if (protect_root && has_capability_noaudit(p, CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) {
 		if (points >= totalpages / 32)
-- 
1.7.3.1