From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> To: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, mst@redhat.com, stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, armbru@redhat.com, anthony.perard@citrix.com Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] xen: implement unplug protocol in xen_platform Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 14:16:05 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <4E0C6905.2040604@redhat.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <4E0C61DF.2050606@suse.de> Am 30.06.2011 13:45, schrieb Alexander Graf: > On 06/28/2011 01:29 PM, stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com wrote: >> From: Stefano Stabellini<stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> >> >> The unplug protocol is necessary to support PV drivers in the guest: the >> drivers expect to be able to "unplug" emulated disks and nics before >> initializing the Xen PV interfaces. >> It is responsibility of the guest to make sure that the unplug is done >> before the emulated devices or the PV interface start to be used. >> >> We use pci_for_each_device to walk the PCI bus, identify the devices and >> disks that we want to disable and dynamically unplug them. > > $ ~/git/qemu/scripts/checkpatch.pl * > ERROR: space required after that ',' (ctx:VxV) > #158: FILE: hw/ide/piix.c:240: > + },{ > ^ > > total: 1 errors, 0 warnings, 130 lines checked I think checkpatch.pl should be fixed in this case. We do have this pattern all over the place in qemu and I don't see why it's bad. > I definitely want to see an ack from Kevin here first though. The approach looks good enough for me, unless someone has a better idea on how to do it cleanly. I commented on the implementation. Kevin
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> To: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, mst@redhat.com, stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, armbru@redhat.com, anthony@codemonkey.ws, anthony.perard@citrix.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] xen: implement unplug protocol in xen_platform Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 14:16:05 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <4E0C6905.2040604@redhat.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <4E0C61DF.2050606@suse.de> Am 30.06.2011 13:45, schrieb Alexander Graf: > On 06/28/2011 01:29 PM, stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com wrote: >> From: Stefano Stabellini<stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> >> >> The unplug protocol is necessary to support PV drivers in the guest: the >> drivers expect to be able to "unplug" emulated disks and nics before >> initializing the Xen PV interfaces. >> It is responsibility of the guest to make sure that the unplug is done >> before the emulated devices or the PV interface start to be used. >> >> We use pci_for_each_device to walk the PCI bus, identify the devices and >> disks that we want to disable and dynamically unplug them. > > $ ~/git/qemu/scripts/checkpatch.pl * > ERROR: space required after that ',' (ctx:VxV) > #158: FILE: hw/ide/piix.c:240: > + },{ > ^ > > total: 1 errors, 0 warnings, 130 lines checked I think checkpatch.pl should be fixed in this case. We do have this pattern all over the place in qemu and I don't see why it's bad. > I definitely want to see an ack from Kevin here first though. The approach looks good enough for me, unless someone has a better idea on how to do it cleanly. I commented on the implementation. Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-30 12:13 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2011-06-28 11:29 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] xen: implement unplug protocol in xen_platform stefano.stabellini 2011-06-28 11:29 ` stefano.stabellini 2011-06-30 11:45 ` [Qemu-devel] " Alexander Graf 2011-06-30 11:45 ` Alexander Graf 2011-06-30 12:16 ` Kevin Wolf [this message] 2011-06-30 12:16 ` Kevin Wolf 2011-06-30 12:14 ` [Qemu-devel] " Alexander Graf 2011-06-30 12:14 ` Alexander Graf 2011-06-30 12:12 ` [Qemu-devel] " Kevin Wolf 2011-06-30 14:16 ` Stefano Stabellini 2011-07-01 8:05 ` Kevin Wolf 2011-07-01 17:30 ` Stefano Stabellini 2011-07-15 10:34 ` Stefano Stabellini 2011-07-15 10:52 ` Kevin Wolf 2011-07-18 12:25 ` Alexander Graf 2011-07-18 16:03 ` Stefano Stabellini
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=4E0C6905.2040604@redhat.com \ --to=kwolf@redhat.com \ --cc=agraf@suse.de \ --cc=anthony.perard@citrix.com \ --cc=armbru@redhat.com \ --cc=mst@redhat.com \ --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \ --cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \ --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.