* CPUFREQ: Mark e_powersaver driver as EXPERIMENTAL and DANGEROUS
@ 2011-07-11 19:22 Rafał Bilski
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Rafał Bilski @ 2011-07-11 19:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Harald Welte, LKLM
Hello!
Sorry for late reply. I've been aware problem with "e_powersaver".
Nobody ever e-mailed me :-)
So far I'm aware "e_powersaver" fully respects values given it by CPU.
Only code added by VIA
seems to be faulty for me. As I understand ACPI P-States provide
unstable 400MHz for system in question too.
If "e_powersaver" was based on outdated documentation I'm sorry. This
driver was neccessary for systems with
C7 CPU's which didn't provide BIOS P-states. But it was in early and
dark ages of first C7 CPU's.
Bye
----------------------------------------------------------------
Najwieksza baza samochodow nowych i uzywanych
Sprawdz >> http://linkint.pl/f29e3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2011-07-11 19:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-07-11 19:22 CPUFREQ: Mark e_powersaver driver as EXPERIMENTAL and DANGEROUS Rafał Bilski
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.