All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] ext4: Create helper function for EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN and i_aiodio_unwritten.
@ 2011-08-16  7:06 Tao Ma
  2011-08-16 14:04 ` Eric Sandeen
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Tao Ma @ 2011-08-16  7:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-ext4; +Cc: Eric Sandeen, Theodore Ts'o

From: Tao Ma <boyu.mt@taobao.com>

EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN flag set and the increase of i_aiodio_unwritten should
be done simultaneously since ext4_end_io_nolock always clear the flag and
decrease the counter in the same time.

We have found some bugs that the flag is set while leaving i_aiodio_unwritten
unchanged. So this patch just tries to creat a helper function to wrap them
to avoid any future bug. The idea is inspired by Eric.

Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Tao Ma <boyu.mt@taobao.com>
---
Ted,
	This patch is based on the patch with subject "ext4: Resolve the hang
of direct i/o read in handling EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN.". I meant it for the next
merge window, but if you think it is also ok for 3.1, go ahead.

 fs/ext4/ext4.h    |   11 +++++++++++
 fs/ext4/extents.c |   10 ++--------
 fs/ext4/inode.c   |    5 +----
 fs/ext4/page-io.c |    6 ++----
 4 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
index e717dfd..514f670 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
+++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
@@ -1247,6 +1247,17 @@ static inline int ext4_valid_inum(struct super_block *sb, unsigned long ino)
 		 ino <= le32_to_cpu(EXT4_SB(sb)->s_es->s_inodes_count));
 }
 
+static inline int ext4_set_io_unwritten_flag(struct inode *inode,
+					     struct ext4_io_end *io_end)
+{
+	if (io_end && !(io_end->flag & EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN)) {
+		io_end->flag |= EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN;
+		atomic_inc(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_aiodio_unwritten);
+		return 1;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
 /*
  * Inode dynamic state flags
  */
diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c
index 57cf568..c0f8655 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
@@ -3190,10 +3190,7 @@ ext4_ext_handle_uninitialized_extents(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
 		 * that this IO needs to conversion to written when IO is
 		 * completed
 		 */
-		if (io && !(io->flag & EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN)) {
-			io->flag = EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN;
-			atomic_inc(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_aiodio_unwritten);
-		} else
+		if (!ext4_set_io_unwritten_flag(inode, io))
 			ext4_set_inode_state(inode, EXT4_STATE_DIO_UNWRITTEN);
 		if (ext4_should_dioread_nolock(inode))
 			map->m_flags |= EXT4_MAP_UNINIT;
@@ -3572,10 +3569,7 @@ int ext4_ext_map_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
 		 * that we need to perform conversion when IO is done.
 		 */
 		if ((flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PRE_IO)) {
-			if (io && !(io->flag & EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN)) {
-				io->flag = EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN;
-				atomic_inc(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_aiodio_unwritten);
-			} else
+			if (!ext4_set_io_unwritten_flag(inode, io))
 				ext4_set_inode_state(inode,
 						     EXT4_STATE_DIO_UNWRITTEN);
 		}
diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
index 40c0b10..128493b 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -2673,10 +2673,7 @@ static void ext4_end_io_buffer_write(struct buffer_head *bh, int uptodate)
 	 * but being more careful is always safe for the future change.
 	 */
 	inode = io_end->inode;
-	if (!(io_end->flag & EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN)) {
-		io_end->flag |= EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN;
-		atomic_inc(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_aiodio_unwritten);
-	}
+	ext4_set_io_unwritten_flag(inode, io_end);
 
 	/* Add the io_end to per-inode completed io list*/
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_completed_io_lock, flags);
diff --git a/fs/ext4/page-io.c b/fs/ext4/page-io.c
index 78839af..edd2f7b 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/page-io.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/page-io.c
@@ -334,10 +334,8 @@ submit_and_retry:
 	if ((io_end->num_io_pages >= MAX_IO_PAGES) &&
 	    (io_end->pages[io_end->num_io_pages-1] != io_page))
 		goto submit_and_retry;
-	if (buffer_uninit(bh) && !(io_end->flag & EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN)) {
-		io_end->flag |= EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN;
-		atomic_inc(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_aiodio_unwritten);
-	}
+	if (buffer_uninit(bh))
+		ext4_set_io_unwritten_flag(inode, io_end);
 	io->io_end->size += bh->b_size;
 	io->io_next_block++;
 	ret = bio_add_page(io->io_bio, bh->b_page, bh->b_size, bh_offset(bh));
-- 
1.7.0.4


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] ext4: Create helper function for EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN and i_aiodio_unwritten.
  2011-08-16  7:06 [PATCH] ext4: Create helper function for EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN and i_aiodio_unwritten Tao Ma
@ 2011-08-16 14:04 ` Eric Sandeen
  2011-08-17  3:06   ` Tao Ma
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Eric Sandeen @ 2011-08-16 14:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tao Ma; +Cc: linux-ext4, Theodore Ts'o

On 8/16/11 2:06 AM, Tao Ma wrote:
> From: Tao Ma <boyu.mt@taobao.com>
> 
> EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN flag set and the increase of i_aiodio_unwritten should
> be done simultaneously since ext4_end_io_nolock always clear the flag and
> decrease the counter in the same time.
> 
> We have found some bugs that the flag is set while leaving i_aiodio_unwritten
> unchanged. So this patch just tries to creat a helper function to wrap them
> to avoid any future bug. The idea is inspired by Eric.

Although I like it a little less now that I see it in practice, sorry.   ;)

This:
                /*
                 * Flag the inode(non aio case) or end_io struct (aio case)
                 * that this IO needs to conversion to written when IO is
                 * completed
                 */
		if (!ext4_set_io_unwritten_flag(inode, io))
			ext4_set_inode_state(inode, EXT4_STATE_DIO_UNWRITTEN);

just reads weirdly to me.

It encapsulates all the steps, but it really isn't intuitive to read, I think.

"If we (can't? don't?) set the io unwritten flag, set the dio unwritten flag
on the inode."

I wonder if changing "io" to "endio" would make it a little more obvious.

I'm not sure, maybe it's ok.  What do others think?

I also wonder about this, but I get lost in this code.  It was originally:

                if (io && !(io->flag & EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN)) {
                        io->flag = EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN;
                        atomic_inc(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_aiodio_unwritten);
                } else
                        ext4_set_inode_state(inode, EXT4_STATE_DIO_UNWRITTEN);

That means that if it is AIO ("if (io)"), but the flag is already set
(io->flag & EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN), we don't re-set the flag or increase
the count, which is fine - but is it then correct to set the state on the
inode?

thanks,
-Eric

> Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
> Signed-off-by: Tao Ma <boyu.mt@taobao.com>
> ---
> Ted,
> 	This patch is based on the patch with subject "ext4: Resolve the hang
> of direct i/o read in handling EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN.". I meant it for the next
> merge window, but if you think it is also ok for 3.1, go ahead.
> 
>  fs/ext4/ext4.h    |   11 +++++++++++
>  fs/ext4/extents.c |   10 ++--------
>  fs/ext4/inode.c   |    5 +----
>  fs/ext4/page-io.c |    6 ++----
>  4 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> index e717dfd..514f670 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> +++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> @@ -1247,6 +1247,17 @@ static inline int ext4_valid_inum(struct super_block *sb, unsigned long ino)
>  		 ino <= le32_to_cpu(EXT4_SB(sb)->s_es->s_inodes_count));
>  }
>  
> +static inline int ext4_set_io_unwritten_flag(struct inode *inode,
> +					     struct ext4_io_end *io_end)
> +{
> +	if (io_end && !(io_end->flag & EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN)) {
> +		io_end->flag |= EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN;
> +		atomic_inc(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_aiodio_unwritten);
> +		return 1;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
>  /*
>   * Inode dynamic state flags
>   */
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c
> index 57cf568..c0f8655 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
> @@ -3190,10 +3190,7 @@ ext4_ext_handle_uninitialized_extents(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
>  		 * that this IO needs to conversion to written when IO is
>  		 * completed
>  		 */
> -		if (io && !(io->flag & EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN)) {
> -			io->flag = EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN;
> -			atomic_inc(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_aiodio_unwritten);
> -		} else
> +		if (!ext4_set_io_unwritten_flag(inode, io))
>  			ext4_set_inode_state(inode, EXT4_STATE_DIO_UNWRITTEN);
>  		if (ext4_should_dioread_nolock(inode))
>  			map->m_flags |= EXT4_MAP_UNINIT;
> @@ -3572,10 +3569,7 @@ int ext4_ext_map_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
>  		 * that we need to perform conversion when IO is done.
>  		 */
>  		if ((flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PRE_IO)) {
> -			if (io && !(io->flag & EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN)) {
> -				io->flag = EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN;
> -				atomic_inc(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_aiodio_unwritten);
> -			} else
> +			if (!ext4_set_io_unwritten_flag(inode, io))
>  				ext4_set_inode_state(inode,
>  						     EXT4_STATE_DIO_UNWRITTEN);
>  		}
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> index 40c0b10..128493b 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> @@ -2673,10 +2673,7 @@ static void ext4_end_io_buffer_write(struct buffer_head *bh, int uptodate)
>  	 * but being more careful is always safe for the future change.
>  	 */
>  	inode = io_end->inode;
> -	if (!(io_end->flag & EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN)) {
> -		io_end->flag |= EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN;
> -		atomic_inc(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_aiodio_unwritten);
> -	}
> +	ext4_set_io_unwritten_flag(inode, io_end);
>  
>  	/* Add the io_end to per-inode completed io list*/
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_completed_io_lock, flags);
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/page-io.c b/fs/ext4/page-io.c
> index 78839af..edd2f7b 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/page-io.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/page-io.c
> @@ -334,10 +334,8 @@ submit_and_retry:
>  	if ((io_end->num_io_pages >= MAX_IO_PAGES) &&
>  	    (io_end->pages[io_end->num_io_pages-1] != io_page))
>  		goto submit_and_retry;
> -	if (buffer_uninit(bh) && !(io_end->flag & EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN)) {
> -		io_end->flag |= EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN;
> -		atomic_inc(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_aiodio_unwritten);
> -	}
> +	if (buffer_uninit(bh))
> +		ext4_set_io_unwritten_flag(inode, io_end);
>  	io->io_end->size += bh->b_size;
>  	io->io_next_block++;
>  	ret = bio_add_page(io->io_bio, bh->b_page, bh->b_size, bh_offset(bh));


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] ext4: Create helper function for EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN and i_aiodio_unwritten.
  2011-08-16 14:04 ` Eric Sandeen
@ 2011-08-17  3:06   ` Tao Ma
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Tao Ma @ 2011-08-17  3:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Eric Sandeen; +Cc: linux-ext4, Theodore Ts'o

On 08/16/2011 10:04 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 8/16/11 2:06 AM, Tao Ma wrote:
>> From: Tao Ma <boyu.mt@taobao.com>
>>
>> EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN flag set and the increase of i_aiodio_unwritten should
>> be done simultaneously since ext4_end_io_nolock always clear the flag and
>> decrease the counter in the same time.
>>
>> We have found some bugs that the flag is set while leaving i_aiodio_unwritten
>> unchanged. So this patch just tries to creat a helper function to wrap them
>> to avoid any future bug. The idea is inspired by Eric.
> 
> Although I like it a little less now that I see it in practice, sorry.   ;)
> 
> This:
>                 /*
>                  * Flag the inode(non aio case) or end_io struct (aio case)
>                  * that this IO needs to conversion to written when IO is
>                  * completed
>                  */
> 		if (!ext4_set_io_unwritten_flag(inode, io))
> 			ext4_set_inode_state(inode, EXT4_STATE_DIO_UNWRITTEN);
> 
> just reads weirdly to me.
yeah, this also looks a little bit strange. Another possible way is that
we just wrap the set of the flag and the inc of aiodio_unwritten while
leave the check there. It should look more natural and good for the reader.
> 
> It encapsulates all the steps, but it really isn't intuitive to read, I think.
> 
> "If we (can't? don't?) set the io unwritten flag, set the dio unwritten flag
> on the inode."
> 
> I wonder if changing "io" to "endio" would make it a little more obvious.
> 
> I'm not sure, maybe it's ok.  What do others think?
> 
> I also wonder about this, but I get lost in this code.  It was originally:
> 
>                 if (io && !(io->flag & EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN)) {
>                         io->flag = EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN;
>                         atomic_inc(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_aiodio_unwritten);
>                 } else
>                         ext4_set_inode_state(inode, EXT4_STATE_DIO_UNWRITTEN);
> 
> That means that if it is AIO ("if (io)"), but the flag is already set
> (io->flag & EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN), we don't re-set the flag or increase
> the count, which is fine - but is it then correct to set the state on the
> inode?
I will check it later.

Thanks
Tao
> 
> thanks,
> -Eric
> 
>> Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
>> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
>> Signed-off-by: Tao Ma <boyu.mt@taobao.com>
>> ---
>> Ted,
>> 	This patch is based on the patch with subject "ext4: Resolve the hang
>> of direct i/o read in handling EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN.". I meant it for the next
>> merge window, but if you think it is also ok for 3.1, go ahead.
>>
>>  fs/ext4/ext4.h    |   11 +++++++++++
>>  fs/ext4/extents.c |   10 ++--------
>>  fs/ext4/inode.c   |    5 +----
>>  fs/ext4/page-io.c |    6 ++----
>>  4 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
>> index e717dfd..514f670 100644
>> --- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
>> +++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
>> @@ -1247,6 +1247,17 @@ static inline int ext4_valid_inum(struct super_block *sb, unsigned long ino)
>>  		 ino <= le32_to_cpu(EXT4_SB(sb)->s_es->s_inodes_count));
>>  }
>>  
>> +static inline int ext4_set_io_unwritten_flag(struct inode *inode,
>> +					     struct ext4_io_end *io_end)
>> +{
>> +	if (io_end && !(io_end->flag & EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN)) {
>> +		io_end->flag |= EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN;
>> +		atomic_inc(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_aiodio_unwritten);
>> +		return 1;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>>  /*
>>   * Inode dynamic state flags
>>   */
>> diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c
>> index 57cf568..c0f8655 100644
>> --- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
>> +++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
>> @@ -3190,10 +3190,7 @@ ext4_ext_handle_uninitialized_extents(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
>>  		 * that this IO needs to conversion to written when IO is
>>  		 * completed
>>  		 */
>> -		if (io && !(io->flag & EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN)) {
>> -			io->flag = EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN;
>> -			atomic_inc(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_aiodio_unwritten);
>> -		} else
>> +		if (!ext4_set_io_unwritten_flag(inode, io))
>>  			ext4_set_inode_state(inode, EXT4_STATE_DIO_UNWRITTEN);
>>  		if (ext4_should_dioread_nolock(inode))
>>  			map->m_flags |= EXT4_MAP_UNINIT;
>> @@ -3572,10 +3569,7 @@ int ext4_ext_map_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
>>  		 * that we need to perform conversion when IO is done.
>>  		 */
>>  		if ((flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PRE_IO)) {
>> -			if (io && !(io->flag & EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN)) {
>> -				io->flag = EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN;
>> -				atomic_inc(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_aiodio_unwritten);
>> -			} else
>> +			if (!ext4_set_io_unwritten_flag(inode, io))
>>  				ext4_set_inode_state(inode,
>>  						     EXT4_STATE_DIO_UNWRITTEN);
>>  		}
>> diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
>> index 40c0b10..128493b 100644
>> --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
>> +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
>> @@ -2673,10 +2673,7 @@ static void ext4_end_io_buffer_write(struct buffer_head *bh, int uptodate)
>>  	 * but being more careful is always safe for the future change.
>>  	 */
>>  	inode = io_end->inode;
>> -	if (!(io_end->flag & EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN)) {
>> -		io_end->flag |= EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN;
>> -		atomic_inc(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_aiodio_unwritten);
>> -	}
>> +	ext4_set_io_unwritten_flag(inode, io_end);
>>  
>>  	/* Add the io_end to per-inode completed io list*/
>>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_completed_io_lock, flags);
>> diff --git a/fs/ext4/page-io.c b/fs/ext4/page-io.c
>> index 78839af..edd2f7b 100644
>> --- a/fs/ext4/page-io.c
>> +++ b/fs/ext4/page-io.c
>> @@ -334,10 +334,8 @@ submit_and_retry:
>>  	if ((io_end->num_io_pages >= MAX_IO_PAGES) &&
>>  	    (io_end->pages[io_end->num_io_pages-1] != io_page))
>>  		goto submit_and_retry;
>> -	if (buffer_uninit(bh) && !(io_end->flag & EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN)) {
>> -		io_end->flag |= EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN;
>> -		atomic_inc(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_aiodio_unwritten);
>> -	}
>> +	if (buffer_uninit(bh))
>> +		ext4_set_io_unwritten_flag(inode, io_end);
>>  	io->io_end->size += bh->b_size;
>>  	io->io_next_block++;
>>  	ret = bio_add_page(io->io_bio, bh->b_page, bh->b_size, bh_offset(bh));
> 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-08-17  3:06 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-08-16  7:06 [PATCH] ext4: Create helper function for EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN and i_aiodio_unwritten Tao Ma
2011-08-16 14:04 ` Eric Sandeen
2011-08-17  3:06   ` Tao Ma

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.