* higher N rates
@ 2011-09-23 2:02 James
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: James @ 2011-09-23 2:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-wireless Mailing List
$ iw dev wlan0 scan
printed this for my N (only) router:
Supported rates: 1.0* 2.0* 5.5* 11.0* 18.0 24.0 36.0 54.0
Extended supported rates: 6.0 9.0 12.0 48.0
Why doesn't it print the higher N rates?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* RE: higher N rates
2011-09-24 15:35 ` Pat Erley
@ 2011-09-24 18:09 ` Arend Van Spriel
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Arend Van Spriel @ 2011-09-24 18:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pat Erley, James; +Cc: linux-wireless Mailing List
> From: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-wireless-
> owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Pat Erley
> Sent: zaterdag 24 september 2011 17:35
>
> On 09/23/2011 11:30 PM, James wrote:
> > $ iw dev wlan0 scan
> >
> > printed this for my N (only) router:
> >
> > Supported rates: 1.0* 2.0* 5.5* 11.0* 18.0 24.0 36.0 54.0
> > Extended supported rates: 6.0 9.0 12.0 48.0
> >
> > Why doesn't it print the higher N rates?
>
> I may be WAY off base here, but I believe iw dev wlan0 scan reports
> what's shown in the beacons, and not what rates are actually
> negotiable.
> Beacons only directly advertise 'pre-n' rates (the basic 802.11abg
> rates).
I think you pretty close to base here ;-)
> If you look at more of the scan results, you should see something like:
>
> HT capabilities:
> Capabilities: 0x11ce
> HT20/HT40
> SM Power Save disabled
> RX HT40 SGI
> TX STBC
> RX STBC 1-stream
> Max AMSDU length: 3839 bytes
> DSSS/CCK HT40
> Maximum RX AMPDU length 65535 bytes (exponent: 0x003)
> Minimum RX AMPDU time spacing: 8 usec (0x06)
> HT TX/RX MCS rate indexes supported: 0-15
The 11n rates are expressed in MCS (Modulation and Coding Scheme) rate
indexes, which translate to a bitrate. So it also advertises 11n rates
albeit in a slightly different format.
Gr. AvS
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: higher N rates
2011-09-24 3:30 James
@ 2011-09-24 15:35 ` Pat Erley
2011-09-24 18:09 ` Arend Van Spriel
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Pat Erley @ 2011-09-24 15:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: James; +Cc: linux-wireless Mailing List
On 09/23/2011 11:30 PM, James wrote:
> $ iw dev wlan0 scan
>
> printed this for my N (only) router:
>
> Supported rates: 1.0* 2.0* 5.5* 11.0* 18.0 24.0 36.0 54.0
> Extended supported rates: 6.0 9.0 12.0 48.0
>
> Why doesn't it print the higher N rates?
I may be WAY off base here, but I believe iw dev wlan0 scan reports
what's shown in the beacons, and not what rates are actually negotiable.
Beacons only directly advertise 'pre-n' rates (the basic 802.11abg rates).
If you look at more of the scan results, you should see something like:
HT capabilities:
Capabilities: 0x11ce
HT20/HT40
SM Power Save disabled
RX HT40 SGI
TX STBC
RX STBC 1-stream
Max AMSDU length: 3839 bytes
DSSS/CCK HT40
Maximum RX AMPDU length 65535 bytes (exponent: 0x003)
Minimum RX AMPDU time spacing: 8 usec (0x06)
HT TX/RX MCS rate indexes supported: 0-15
HT operation:
* primary channel: 36
* secondary channel offset: above
* STA channel width: any
* RIFS: 0
* HT protection: no
* non-GF present: 0
* OBSS non-GF present: 0
* dual beacon: 0
* dual CTS protection: 0
* STBC beacon: 0
* L-SIG TXOP Prot: 0
* PCO active: 0
* PCO phase: 0
Which outlines the 802.11n parameters that your device and the AP can use
to negotiate 802.11n operation. Perhaps there is something more that should
be reported, but you'll see throughputs in the 802.11n range WHEN it's
warranted. With my DSL connection, I rarely see rates above 9mbit in use (my
DSL is 1.5mbit down).
Pat
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* higher N rates
@ 2011-09-24 3:30 James
2011-09-24 15:35 ` Pat Erley
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: James @ 2011-09-24 3:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-wireless Mailing List
$ iw dev wlan0 scan
printed this for my N (only) router:
Supported rates: 1.0* 2.0* 5.5* 11.0* 18.0 24.0 36.0 54.0
Extended supported rates: 6.0 9.0 12.0 48.0
Why doesn't it print the higher N rates?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-09-24 18:09 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-09-23 2:02 higher N rates James
2011-09-24 3:30 James
2011-09-24 15:35 ` Pat Erley
2011-09-24 18:09 ` Arend Van Spriel
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.