All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	<linux-next@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the cputime tree
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 09:35:09 -0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EDF4F6D.1040806@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111207150956.52d41fd8580de3b66abd5d2d@canb.auug.org.au>

On 12/07/2011 02:09 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> + 	index = (TASK_NICE(p)>  0) ? CPUTIME_NICE : CPUTIME_USER;
> +
>    	/* Add user time to cpustat. */
> - 	if (TASK_NICE(p)>  0)
> - 		cpustat->nice += (__force cputime64_t) cputime;
> - 	else
> - 		cpustat->user += (__force cputime64_t) cputime;
>   -	task_group_account_field(p, index, cputime);
> ++	task_group_account_field(p, index, (__force cputime64_t) cputime);


I doubt __force cputime64_t is necessary. After these patches, those 
fields are all u64.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the cputime tree
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 09:35:09 -0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EDF4F6D.1040806@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111207150956.52d41fd8580de3b66abd5d2d@canb.auug.org.au>

On 12/07/2011 02:09 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> + 	index = (TASK_NICE(p)>  0) ? CPUTIME_NICE : CPUTIME_USER;
> +
>    	/* Add user time to cpustat. */
> - 	if (TASK_NICE(p)>  0)
> - 		cpustat->nice += (__force cputime64_t) cputime;
> - 	else
> - 		cpustat->user += (__force cputime64_t) cputime;
>   -	task_group_account_field(p, index, cputime);
> ++	task_group_account_field(p, index, (__force cputime64_t) cputime);


I doubt __force cputime64_t is necessary. After these patches, those 
fields are all u64.

  reply	other threads:[~2011-12-07 11:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-07  4:09 linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the cputime tree Stephen Rothwell
2011-12-07 11:35 ` Glauber Costa [this message]
2011-12-07 11:35   ` Glauber Costa
2011-12-07 11:59   ` Martin Schwidefsky
2011-12-07 11:59     ` Martin Schwidefsky
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-12-19  4:40 Stephen Rothwell
2011-12-19  8:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-19  9:11   ` Martin Schwidefsky
2011-12-19 10:35     ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-19 11:25       ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-19 14:24         ` Martin Schwidefsky
2011-12-19 16:30           ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-19 19:06             ` Martin Schwidefsky
2011-12-20 11:09               ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-19 12:31       ` Martin Schwidefsky
2011-12-19 13:43         ` Glauber Costa
2011-12-19 13:43           ` Glauber Costa
2011-12-19 14:19           ` Martin Schwidefsky
2011-12-19 14:19             ` Martin Schwidefsky
2011-12-19 14:08         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-19 14:25           ` Martin Schwidefsky
2011-12-20 10:19           ` Glauber Costa
2011-12-20 10:19             ` Glauber Costa
2011-10-25  7:44 Stephen Rothwell
2011-10-25  7:40 Stephen Rothwell
2011-10-25 15:29 ` Michal Hocko
2011-10-25  7:35 Stephen Rothwell
2011-10-25 15:28 ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4EDF4F6D.1040806@parallels.com \
    --to=glommer@parallels.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.