All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [U-Boot] ARM: Update mach-types
@ 2012-02-27 21:56 Troy Kisky
  2012-02-27 22:56 ` Marek Vasut
  2012-02-28  6:50 ` Dirk Behme
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Troy Kisky @ 2012-02-27 21:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

|ARM: Update mach-types
|
|This commit updates the mach-types based on the latest in Linus's head
|
|Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>

Hi Marek,


Can I get you to do this again? I'd the symbol for
MACH_MX6Q_SABRELITE.

Thanks
Troy

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot] ARM: Update mach-types
  2012-02-27 21:56 [U-Boot] ARM: Update mach-types Troy Kisky
@ 2012-02-27 22:56 ` Marek Vasut
  2012-02-28  1:14   ` Troy Kisky
  2012-02-28  6:50 ` Dirk Behme
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Marek Vasut @ 2012-02-27 22:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

> |ARM: Update mach-types
> |
> |This commit updates the mach-types based on the latest in Linus's head
> |
> |Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>
> 
> Hi Marek,
> 
> 
> Can I get you to do this again? I'd the symbol for
> MACH_MX6Q_SABRELITE.


No, can you please submit the mach-types update yourself? Thank you!

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot] ARM: Update mach-types
  2012-02-27 22:56 ` Marek Vasut
@ 2012-02-28  1:14   ` Troy Kisky
  2012-02-28  3:51     ` Marek Vasut
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Troy Kisky @ 2012-02-28  1:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

On 2/27/2012 3:56 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> |ARM: Update mach-types
>> |
>> |This commit updates the mach-types based on the latest in Linus's head
>> |
>> |Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut<marek.vasut@gmail.com>
>>
>> Hi Marek,
>>
>>
>> Can I get you to do this again? I'd the symbol for
>> MACH_MX6Q_SABRELITE.
>
> No, can you please submit the mach-types update yourself? Thank you!
>
I don't think I'm trusted to do that. I think that some machines may 
have been removed
from Linux that u-boot may want to keep. Since I only want to use the 
value in 1 place,
is it acceptable to just use the hex value instead?

Thanks
Troy

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot] ARM: Update mach-types
  2012-02-28  1:14   ` Troy Kisky
@ 2012-02-28  3:51     ` Marek Vasut
  2012-02-29  0:01       ` stefano babic
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Marek Vasut @ 2012-02-28  3:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

> On 2/27/2012 3:56 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > |ARM: Update mach-types
> > > |
> > > |This commit updates the mach-types based on the latest in Linus's
> > > head |
> > > |Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut<marek.vasut@gmail.com>
> > > 
> > > Hi Marek,
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Can I get you to do this again? I'd the symbol for
> > > MACH_MX6Q_SABRELITE.
> > 
> > No, can you please submit the mach-types update yourself? Thank you!
> > 
> I don't think I'm trusted to do that. I think that some machines may 
> have been removed
> from Linux that u-boot may want to keep.

So these machines have to define their mach id in their config (and you need to fix them after replacing mach-types).

Since I only want to use the 
> value in 1 place,
> is it acceptable to just use the hex value instead?

No, either update the mach types (preffered) or ... Update the mach types ;)

Thanks in advance. M

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot] ARM: Update mach-types
  2012-02-27 21:56 [U-Boot] ARM: Update mach-types Troy Kisky
  2012-02-27 22:56 ` Marek Vasut
@ 2012-02-28  6:50 ` Dirk Behme
  2012-02-28  9:28   ` Fabio Estevam
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Dirk Behme @ 2012-02-28  6:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

On 27.02.2012 22:56, Troy Kisky wrote:
> |ARM: Update mach-types
> |
> |This commit updates the mach-types based on the latest in Linus's head
> |
> |Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>
> 
> Hi Marek,
> 
> 
> Can I get you to do this again? I'd the symbol for
> MACH_MX6Q_SABRELITE.

Just out of curiosity: Why do you need that?

It was my understanding that with recent U-Boot and Kernel on SabreLite 
DeviceTree is the way to go? And this doesn't need the mach-types any more?

Best regards

Dirk

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot] ARM: Update mach-types
  2012-02-28  6:50 ` Dirk Behme
@ 2012-02-28  9:28   ` Fabio Estevam
  2012-02-28 13:36     ` Eric Nelson
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Fabio Estevam @ 2012-02-28  9:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 3:50 AM, Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@de.bosch.com> wrote:

> Just out of curiosity: Why do you need that?
>
> It was my understanding that with recent U-Boot and Kernel on SabreLite
> DeviceTree is the way to go? And this doesn't need the mach-types any more?

Maybe Troy wants to also allow U-boot to load a non-DT kernel, such as
the one provided by Freescale?

Regards,

Fabio Estevam

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot] ARM: Update mach-types
  2012-02-28  9:28   ` Fabio Estevam
@ 2012-02-28 13:36     ` Eric Nelson
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Eric Nelson @ 2012-02-28 13:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

On 02/28/2012 02:28 AM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 3:50 AM, Dirk Behme<dirk.behme@de.bosch.com>  wrote:
>
>> Just out of curiosity: Why do you need that?
>>
>> It was my understanding that with recent U-Boot and Kernel on SabreLite
>> DeviceTree is the way to go? And this doesn't need the mach-types any more?
>
> Maybe Troy wants to also allow U-boot to load a non-DT kernel, such as
> the one provided by Freescale?
>

That's exactly right. With the addition of a couple of small things:

	- machid
	- revision tag (used by Freescale's kernel)

we can start shipping main-line U-Boot with Sabre Lite.

This seems like a worthwhile step, especially for those of us switching
between kernels.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot] ARM: Update mach-types
  2012-02-28  3:51     ` Marek Vasut
@ 2012-02-29  0:01       ` stefano babic
  2012-02-29 20:33         ` Troy Kisky
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: stefano babic @ 2012-02-29  0:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

Am 28/02/2012 04:51, schrieb Marek Vasut:
>> On 2/27/2012 3:56 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>> |ARM: Update mach-types
>>>> |
>>>> |This commit updates the mach-types based on the latest in Linus's
>>>> head |
>>>> |Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut<marek.vasut@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> Hi Marek,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Can I get you to do this again? I'd the symbol for
>>>> MACH_MX6Q_SABRELITE.
>>>
>>> No, can you please submit the mach-types update yourself? Thank you!
>>>
>> I don't think I'm trusted to do that. I think that some machines may 
>> have been removed
>> from Linux that u-boot may want to keep.
> 
> So these machines have to define their mach id in their config (and you need to fix them after replacing mach-types).
> 
> Since I only want to use the 
>> value in 1 place,
>> is it acceptable to just use the hex value instead?
> 
> No, either update the mach types (preffered) or ... Update the mach types ;)

It was discussed and accepted that the boards can set CONFIG_MACH_TYPE
directly into the configuration file. In this way, we continue to
support in U-Boot boards independently if they are pushed to Linux
mainline or not.

On the other side, everybody can send the current mach-types from the
Linux kernel to Albert (ARM Maintainer) - if a board is already in
kernel mainline is the preferred way.

Best regards,
Stefano Babic

-- 
=====================================================================
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80  Email: office at denx.de
=====================================================================

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot] ARM: Update mach-types
  2012-02-29  0:01       ` stefano babic
@ 2012-02-29 20:33         ` Troy Kisky
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Troy Kisky @ 2012-02-29 20:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

On 2/28/2012 5:01 PM, stefano babic wrote:
> Am 28/02/2012 04:51, schrieb Marek Vasut:
>>> On 2/27/2012 3:56 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>>> |ARM: Update mach-types
>>>>> |
>>>>> |This commit updates the mach-types based on the latest in Linus's
>>>>> head |
>>>>> |Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut<marek.vasut@gmail.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Marek,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Can I get you to do this again? I'd the symbol for
>>>>> MACH_MX6Q_SABRELITE.
>>>> No, can you please submit the mach-types update yourself? Thank you!
>>>>
>>> I don't think I'm trusted to do that. I think that some machines may
>>> have been removed
>>> from Linux that u-boot may want to keep.
>> So these machines have to define their mach id in their config (and you need to fix them after replacing mach-types).
>>
>> Since I only want to use the
>>> value in 1 place,
>>> is it acceptable to just use the hex value instead?
>> No, either update the mach types (preffered) or ... Update the mach types ;)
> It was discussed and accepted that the boards can set CONFIG_MACH_TYPE
> directly into the configuration file. In this way, we continue to
> support in U-Boot boards independently if they are pushed to Linux
> mainline or not.
>
> On the other side, everybody can send the current mach-types from the
> Linux kernel to Albert (ARM Maintainer) - if a board is already in
> kernel mainline is the preferred way.
>
> Best regards,
> Stefano Babic
>
Thanks for the information. I'll send to Albert soon.

Troy

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot] ARM Update mach-types
@ 2010-02-27 23:35 Tom
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Tom @ 2010-02-27 23:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

This is a regular update of mach-types
Tom

Author: Tom Rix <Tom.Rix@windriver.com>
Date:   Thu Feb 25 12:05:32 2010 -0600

     ARM Update mach-types

     Fetched from http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/machines/download.php
     And built with

     repo http://ftp.arm.linux.org.uk/pub/linux/arm/kernel/git-cur/linux-2.6-arm
     commit aea187c46f7d03ce985e55eb1398d0776a15b928

     Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <Tom.Rix@windriver.com>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot] ARM update mach-types
@ 2009-11-15 17:55 Tom
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Tom @ 2009-11-15 17:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot


I have pushed this change to arm/next

This is a process change.
I am using the latest machine registry.

If you were waiting on an update, your machine should now
be here.

Tom

commit 14fa358c9e72131339c8e33ce6a86ed292ef2f46
Author: Tom Rix <Tom.Rix@windriver.com>
Date:   Sun Nov 15 10:58:06 2009 -0600

     ARM Update mach-types

     Fetched from http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/machines/download.php
     And built with

     repo http://ftp.arm.linux.org.uk/pub/linux/arm/kernel/git-cur/linux-2.6-arm
     commit 156171c71a0dc4bce12b4408bb1591f8fe32dc1a

     Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <Tom.Rix@windriver.com>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2012-02-29 20:33 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-02-27 21:56 [U-Boot] ARM: Update mach-types Troy Kisky
2012-02-27 22:56 ` Marek Vasut
2012-02-28  1:14   ` Troy Kisky
2012-02-28  3:51     ` Marek Vasut
2012-02-29  0:01       ` stefano babic
2012-02-29 20:33         ` Troy Kisky
2012-02-28  6:50 ` Dirk Behme
2012-02-28  9:28   ` Fabio Estevam
2012-02-28 13:36     ` Eric Nelson
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-02-27 23:35 [U-Boot] ARM " Tom
2009-11-15 17:55 [U-Boot] ARM update mach-types Tom

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.