* [Buildroot] [PATCH] netsnmp: add option to enable debugging code
@ 2012-03-15 21:04 Luca Ceresoli
2012-03-18 17:37 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2012-03-18 20:41 ` Peter Korsgaard
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Luca Ceresoli @ 2012-03-15 21:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli <luca@lucaceresoli.net>
---
package/netsnmp/Config.in | 9 +++++++++
package/netsnmp/netsnmp.mk | 6 +++++-
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/package/netsnmp/Config.in b/package/netsnmp/Config.in
index 431be2d..108ab83 100644
--- a/package/netsnmp/Config.in
+++ b/package/netsnmp/Config.in
@@ -14,3 +14,12 @@ config BR2_PACKAGE_NETSNMP_ENABLE_MIBS
The net-snmp package contains a selection of MIB files.
Say yes if you want those MIB files installed on the target
and enable the code that parses the MIB files.
+
+config BR2_PACKAGE_NETSNMP_ENABLE_DEBUGGING
+ bool "Enable debugging code"
+ depends on BR2_PACKAGE_NETSNMP
+ help
+ By default net-snmp is compiled without debugging support
+ (--disable-debugging). Enable this options if you need debugging
+ support, including the ability to log with DEBUGMSG(),
+ DEBUGMSGTL() and companion macros.
diff --git a/package/netsnmp/netsnmp.mk b/package/netsnmp/netsnmp.mk
index 959e39f..448e3fd 100644
--- a/package/netsnmp/netsnmp.mk
+++ b/package/netsnmp/netsnmp.mk
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ NETSNMP_CONF_ENV = ac_cv_NETSNMP_CAN_USE_SYSCTL=yes
NETSNMP_CONF_OPT = --with-persistent-directory=/var/lib/snmp --disable-static \
--with-defaults --enable-mini-agent --without-rpm \
--with-logfile=none --without-kmem-usage $(DISABLE_IPV6) \
- --enable-as-needed --disable-debugging --without-perl-modules \
+ --enable-as-needed --without-perl-modules \
--disable-embedded-perl --disable-perl-cc-checks \
--disable-scripts --with-default-snmp-version="1" \
--enable-silent-libtool --enable-mfd-rewrites \
@@ -55,6 +55,10 @@ define NETSNMP_REMOVE_MIBS_IPV6
endef
endif
+ifneq ($(BR2_PACKAGE_NETSNMP_ENABLE_DEBUGGING),y)
+ NETSNMP_CONF_OPT += --disable-debugging
+endif
+
define NETSNMP_INSTALL_TARGET_CMDS
$(TARGET_MAKE_ENV) $(MAKE) -C $(@D) \
DESTDIR=$(TARGET_DIR) install
--
1.7.5.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [PATCH] netsnmp: add option to enable debugging code
2012-03-15 21:04 [Buildroot] [PATCH] netsnmp: add option to enable debugging code Luca Ceresoli
@ 2012-03-18 17:37 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2012-03-18 20:40 ` Peter Korsgaard
2012-03-18 20:41 ` Peter Korsgaard
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Arnout Vandecappelle @ 2012-03-18 17:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
On Thursday 15 March 2012 22:04:27 Luca Ceresoli wrote:
> +ifneq ($(BR2_PACKAGE_NETSNMP_ENABLE_DEBUGGING),y)
> + NETSNMP_CONF_OPT += --disable-debugging
> +endif
Peter, is it correct that you prefer to have both the positive and the
negative option in such a situation? I.e.
ifeq ($(BR2_PACKAGE_NETSNMP_ENABLE_DEBUGGING),y)
NETSNMP_CONF_OPT += --enable-debugging
else
NETSNMP_CONF_OPT += --disable-debugging
endif
or alternatively
NETSNMP_CONF_OPT += --$(if $(BR2_PACKAGE_NETSNMP_ENABLE_DEBUGGING),en,dis)able-debugging
Otherwise,
Acked-by: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <arnout@mind.be>
Regards,
Arnout
--
Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be
Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286540
Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be
G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven
LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle
GPG fingerprint: 7CB5 E4CC 6C2E EFD4 6E3D A754 F963 ECAB 2450 2F1F
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [PATCH] netsnmp: add option to enable debugging code
2012-03-18 17:37 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
@ 2012-03-18 20:40 ` Peter Korsgaard
2012-03-19 9:19 ` Luca Ceresoli
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Peter Korsgaard @ 2012-03-18 20:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
>>>>> "Arnout" == Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be> writes:
Arnout> On Thursday 15 March 2012 22:04:27 Luca Ceresoli wrote:
>> +ifneq ($(BR2_PACKAGE_NETSNMP_ENABLE_DEBUGGING),y)
>> + NETSNMP_CONF_OPT += --disable-debugging
>> +endif
Arnout> Peter, is it correct that you prefer to have both the positive
Arnout> and the negative option in such a situation? I.e.
Arnout> ifeq ($(BR2_PACKAGE_NETSNMP_ENABLE_DEBUGGING),y)
Arnout> NETSNMP_CONF_OPT += --enable-debugging
Arnout> else
Arnout> NETSNMP_CONF_OPT += --disable-debugging
Arnout> endif
I don't feel strongly about it, but the 2nd approach means you don't
need to look at configure.ac to check if it defaults to --enable (and it
won't break if the default is ever changed).
--
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [PATCH] netsnmp: add option to enable debugging code
2012-03-15 21:04 [Buildroot] [PATCH] netsnmp: add option to enable debugging code Luca Ceresoli
2012-03-18 17:37 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
@ 2012-03-18 20:41 ` Peter Korsgaard
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Peter Korsgaard @ 2012-03-18 20:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
>>>>> "Luca" == Luca Ceresoli <luca@lucaceresoli.net> writes:
Luca> Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli <luca@lucaceresoli.net>
Committed, thanks.
--
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [PATCH] netsnmp: add option to enable debugging code
2012-03-18 20:40 ` Peter Korsgaard
@ 2012-03-19 9:19 ` Luca Ceresoli
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Luca Ceresoli @ 2012-03-19 9:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
Peter Korsgaard wrote:
>>>>>> "Arnout" == Arnout Vandecappelle<arnout@mind.be> writes:
> Arnout> On Thursday 15 March 2012 22:04:27 Luca Ceresoli wrote:
> >> +ifneq ($(BR2_PACKAGE_NETSNMP_ENABLE_DEBUGGING),y)
> >> + NETSNMP_CONF_OPT += --disable-debugging
> >> +endif
>
> Arnout> Peter, is it correct that you prefer to have both the positive
> Arnout> and the negative option in such a situation? I.e.
>
> Arnout> ifeq ($(BR2_PACKAGE_NETSNMP_ENABLE_DEBUGGING),y)
> Arnout> NETSNMP_CONF_OPT += --enable-debugging
> Arnout> else
> Arnout> NETSNMP_CONF_OPT += --disable-debugging
> Arnout> endif
>
> I don't feel strongly about it, but the 2nd approach means you don't
> need to look at configure.ac to check if it defaults to --enable (and it
> won't break if the default is ever changed).
>
Arnout's version is definitely more robust, although less concise and more
boring to write.
But there are many other examples in the current Buildroot code without the
else part. So I think we should have a guideline to follow coherently.
It would be great to have a macro to generate all of this boilerplate code,
both robust and concise. I would love to be able to write something like:
$(call ac-arg-endisable,BR2_PACKAGE_NETSNMP_ENABLE_DEBUGGING,debugging)
It's even on my TODO list, which is the first step to many great things!
Luca
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-03-19 9:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-03-15 21:04 [Buildroot] [PATCH] netsnmp: add option to enable debugging code Luca Ceresoli
2012-03-18 17:37 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2012-03-18 20:40 ` Peter Korsgaard
2012-03-19 9:19 ` Luca Ceresoli
2012-03-18 20:41 ` Peter Korsgaard
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.