All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Newbury <steve@snewbury.org.uk>
To: Steven Newbury <steve@snewbury.org.uk>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
	"Barnes, Jesse" <jesse.barnes@intel.com>,
	Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	DRI mailing list <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: PCI resources above 4GB
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 19:05:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F89BC84.50308@snewbury.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F89B5E8.3040906@snewbury.org.uk>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1622 bytes --]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 14/04/12 18:37, Steven Newbury wrote:
> On 12/04/12 17:40, Steven Newbury wrote:
>> On Thu, 12 Apr 2012, 17:07:33 BST, Yinghai Lu
>> <yinghai@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
>>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:22 AM, Steven Newbury 
>>> <steve@snewbury.org.uk> wrote:
>>>> Thanks, that fixed it! :) I had a similar patch I've been 
>>>> working on but I had my fix in the wrong place!
>>>> 
>>>> In the working case, initially the BIOS has set GMA to
>>>> within the low system DRAM 0xC0000000 obviously invalid.
>>>> This conflict is detected and it's relallocated to
>>>> 0x12000000.
>>>> 
>>>> I've attempted to modify probe.c to disable 64-bit BARs not 
>>>> allocated above 4G so they get reallocated above when
>>>> possible later.  It seemed to work, but again broke GMA
>>>> despite the BAR originally containing an invalid address as
>>>> mentioned above, it seems for some reason something is
>>>> different when the conflict is detected and rellocated,
>>>> compared to disabling it early then allocating a valid
>>>> value..?
>>>> 
> I've created a new quirk utilising an extra PCI resource flag to
> force reallocation of the resource.  It's the first approach I've
> had any success at.  It does work.  Only "Intel Page Flush" now
> gets allocated @0xe0000000!
> 
> 
Hopefully this should fix "Intel Flush Page"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk+JvIQACgkQGcb56gMuC63G3ACgma4pUxuwjAAJ0ACS5A32xFwa
k1MAn21y2w6m+Ar+3DwH4Swy1IlicHmN
=nBpy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[-- Attachment #2: intel-flush-page-fit.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 943 bytes --]

commit ccc1099a1474815f4094e8689ca0b518de464230
Author: Steven Newbury <steve@snewbury.org.uk>
Date:   Sat Apr 14 19:02:47 2012 +0100

    intel-gtt: Use pci_bus_alloc_resource_fit() to allocate "Intel Flush Page".

diff --git a/drivers/char/agp/intel-gtt.c b/drivers/char/agp/intel-gtt.c
index 77e150e..30b1ea2 100644
--- a/drivers/char/agp/intel-gtt.c
+++ b/drivers/char/agp/intel-gtt.c
@@ -1036,9 +1036,9 @@ static struct agp_memory *intel_fake_agp_alloc_by_type(size_t pg_count,
 static int intel_alloc_chipset_flush_resource(void)
 {
 	int ret;
-	ret = pci_bus_alloc_resource(intel_private.bridge_dev->bus, &intel_private.ifp_resource, PAGE_SIZE,
+	ret = pci_bus_alloc_resource_fit(intel_private.bridge_dev->bus, &intel_private.ifp_resource, PAGE_SIZE,
 				     PAGE_SIZE, PCIBIOS_MIN_MEM, 0,
-				     pcibios_align_resource, intel_private.bridge_dev);
+				     pcibios_align_resource, intel_private.bridge_dev, 1);
 
 	return ret;
 }

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Steven Newbury <steve@snewbury.org.uk>
To: Steven Newbury <steve@snewbury.org.uk>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
	"Barnes, Jesse" <jesse.barnes@intel.com>,
	Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	DRI mailing list <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: PCI resources above 4GB
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 19:05:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F89BC84.50308@snewbury.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F89B5E8.3040906@snewbury.org.uk>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1622 bytes --]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 14/04/12 18:37, Steven Newbury wrote:
> On 12/04/12 17:40, Steven Newbury wrote:
>> On Thu, 12 Apr 2012, 17:07:33 BST, Yinghai Lu
>> <yinghai@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
>>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:22 AM, Steven Newbury 
>>> <steve@snewbury.org.uk> wrote:
>>>> Thanks, that fixed it! :) I had a similar patch I've been 
>>>> working on but I had my fix in the wrong place!
>>>> 
>>>> In the working case, initially the BIOS has set GMA to
>>>> within the low system DRAM 0xC0000000 obviously invalid.
>>>> This conflict is detected and it's relallocated to
>>>> 0x12000000.
>>>> 
>>>> I've attempted to modify probe.c to disable 64-bit BARs not 
>>>> allocated above 4G so they get reallocated above when
>>>> possible later.  It seemed to work, but again broke GMA
>>>> despite the BAR originally containing an invalid address as
>>>> mentioned above, it seems for some reason something is
>>>> different when the conflict is detected and rellocated,
>>>> compared to disabling it early then allocating a valid
>>>> value..?
>>>> 
> I've created a new quirk utilising an extra PCI resource flag to
> force reallocation of the resource.  It's the first approach I've
> had any success at.  It does work.  Only "Intel Page Flush" now
> gets allocated @0xe0000000!
> 
> 
Hopefully this should fix "Intel Flush Page"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk+JvIQACgkQGcb56gMuC63G3ACgma4pUxuwjAAJ0ACS5A32xFwa
k1MAn21y2w6m+Ar+3DwH4Swy1IlicHmN
=nBpy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[-- Attachment #2: intel-flush-page-fit.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 943 bytes --]

commit ccc1099a1474815f4094e8689ca0b518de464230
Author: Steven Newbury <steve@snewbury.org.uk>
Date:   Sat Apr 14 19:02:47 2012 +0100

    intel-gtt: Use pci_bus_alloc_resource_fit() to allocate "Intel Flush Page".

diff --git a/drivers/char/agp/intel-gtt.c b/drivers/char/agp/intel-gtt.c
index 77e150e..30b1ea2 100644
--- a/drivers/char/agp/intel-gtt.c
+++ b/drivers/char/agp/intel-gtt.c
@@ -1036,9 +1036,9 @@ static struct agp_memory *intel_fake_agp_alloc_by_type(size_t pg_count,
 static int intel_alloc_chipset_flush_resource(void)
 {
 	int ret;
-	ret = pci_bus_alloc_resource(intel_private.bridge_dev->bus, &intel_private.ifp_resource, PAGE_SIZE,
+	ret = pci_bus_alloc_resource_fit(intel_private.bridge_dev->bus, &intel_private.ifp_resource, PAGE_SIZE,
 				     PAGE_SIZE, PCIBIOS_MIN_MEM, 0,
-				     pcibios_align_resource, intel_private.bridge_dev);
+				     pcibios_align_resource, intel_private.bridge_dev, 1);
 
 	return ret;
 }

  reply	other threads:[~2012-04-14 18:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 94+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-09 10:49 PCI resources above 4GB Steven Newbury
2012-04-10  0:51 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-04-10 10:53   ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-10 15:16     ` Yinghai Lu
     [not found]       ` <4F8467AA.90305@snewbury.org.uk>
2012-04-10 17:29         ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-10 18:40         ` Yinghai Lu
2012-04-10 18:44           ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-10 19:00           ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-10 19:04             ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-10 19:16             ` Yinghai Lu
2012-04-10 19:46               ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-10 20:07                 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-04-10 20:26                   ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-10 20:45                     ` Yinghai Lu
2012-04-10 21:19                       ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-11  3:37                         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-04-11  5:33                           ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-11  9:03                             ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-11 14:33                           ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-11 23:59                             ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-04-12 11:39                               ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-12  0:57                         ` Yinghai Lu
2012-04-12 11:22                           ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-12 16:07                             ` Yinghai Lu
2012-04-12 16:40                               ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-13  8:26                                 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-04-13  8:34                                   ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-13 11:45                                   ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-13 11:58                                     ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-13 11:58                                       ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-13 12:49                                       ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-13 12:49                                         ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-13 13:26                                         ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-13 13:26                                           ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-13 13:52                                           ` drm-next i915 regression? ( was: Re: PCI resources above 4GB) Steven Newbury
2012-04-13 14:08                                             ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-13 14:08                                               ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-13 14:13                                               ` Daniel Vetter
2012-04-13 14:19                                                 ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-13 15:23                                                   ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-13 15:23                                                     ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-13 15:49                                                     ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-13 16:17                                                       ` Yinghai Lu
2012-04-13 17:12                                                         ` btrfs oops [was Re: drm-next i915 regression? ( was: Re: PCI resources above 4GB)] Steven Newbury
2012-04-13 17:38                                                         ` drm-next i915 regression? ( was: Re: PCI resources above 4GB) Steven Newbury
2012-04-13 18:12                                                           ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-13 21:51                                                             ` Btrfs corruption Oops " Steven Newbury
2012-04-14 17:37                                 ` PCI resources above 4GB Steven Newbury
2012-04-14 17:37                                   ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-14 18:05                                   ` Steven Newbury [this message]
2012-04-14 18:05                                     ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-14 18:42                                     ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-14 18:42                                       ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-14 19:08                                       ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-14 19:08                                         ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-14 19:21                                         ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-14 19:21                                           ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-14 20:48                                           ` Yinghai Lu
2012-04-15 10:19                                             ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-15 10:19                                               ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-15 10:20                                             ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-15 10:20                                               ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-15 11:37                                               ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-15 11:37                                                 ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-15 17:25                                                 ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-15 17:25                                                   ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-15 17:31                                                   ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-15 17:31                                                     ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-15 20:05                                                     ` Yinghai Lu
2012-04-15 20:06                                                       ` Yinghai Lu
2012-04-16  6:54                                                         ` Yinghai Lu
2012-04-16  7:01                                                           ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-16  7:01                                                             ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-16 17:29                                                           ` Yinghai Lu
2012-04-18  7:21                                                             ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-18  7:21                                                               ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-24  9:49                                                             ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-24  9:49                                                               ` Steven Newbury
     [not found]                                                               ` <4FB227D3.7090002@snewbury.org.uk>
     [not found]                                                                 ` <CAE9FiQX48eCS85eWMFxm6fCWgu2zwxvSywtQhsf-35WEvBfJVQ@mail.gmail.com>
2012-05-17 12:27                                                                   ` Steven Newbury
2012-05-17 12:34                                                                     ` Steven Newbury
2012-05-17 16:36                                                                       ` Yinghai Lu
2012-05-18  7:45                                                                         ` Yinghai Lu
2012-05-18  9:08                                                                           ` Yinghai Lu
2012-05-21 17:27                                                                             ` Steven Newbury
2012-05-21 17:27                                                                               ` Steven Newbury
2012-05-29 23:19                                                                               ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-06-01 23:06                                                                                 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-04-15  3:21                                   ` Yinghai Lu
2012-04-15 10:18                                     ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-15 10:18                                       ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-15 11:31                                     ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-15 11:31                                       ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-12 16:29                             ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-11 11:43                       ` Steven Newbury

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F89BC84.50308@snewbury.org.uk \
    --to=steve@snewbury.org.uk \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jesse.barnes@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.