From: Marc Branchaud <marcnarc@xiplink.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 0/3] fetch: Only call a new ref a "branch" if it's under refs/heads/.
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 15:30:21 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F8DC4CD.9090106@xiplink.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vbomqpef1.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On 12-04-17 11:26 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> marcnarc@xiplink.com writes:
>
>> It turns out that ref->peer_ref is always NULL in update_local_ref(). So I
>> made its caller pass in the full remote ref as a new parameter. I also added
>> a unit test.
>>
>> This series is a complete resend of all the patches discussed in these
>> threads, including Jens's submodule recursion fix.
>
> Thanks, but I'd prefer to keep unrelated things as separate unless there
> is a compelling reason not to.
>
> Also I do not think renaming of the existing parameter in the first patch
> is warranted, especially when the new parameter you are adding is more
> descriptive (i.e. "remote_ref" in the context of that function makes it
> clear enough that it is not just a string but is a pointer to a ref
> structure).
>
> So let's do this.
I'm good with both your patches. Thanks much for fixing my work!
M.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-17 19:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-13 17:08 [PATCHv2] fetch: Only call a new ref a "branch" if it's under refs/heads/ marcnarc
2012-04-13 20:07 ` Jonathan Nieder
2012-04-16 14:26 ` Marc Branchaud
2012-04-13 21:13 ` Jeff King
2012-04-13 21:53 ` Jonathan Nieder
2012-04-13 22:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-04-16 14:58 ` Marc Branchaud
2012-04-16 15:00 ` Jeff King
2012-04-16 15:52 ` [PATCHv3] fetch: Use the remote's ref name to decide how to describe new refs marcnarc
2012-04-16 16:10 ` Jonathan Nieder
2012-04-16 17:59 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-04-16 20:21 ` Marc Branchaud
2012-04-16 22:08 ` [PATCHv4 0/3] fetch: Only call a new ref a "branch" if it's under refs/heads/ marcnarc
2012-04-16 22:08 ` [PATCH 1/3] submodules: recursive fetch also checks new tags for submodule commits marcnarc
2012-04-16 22:08 ` [PATCH 2/3] fetch: Pass both the full remote ref and its short name to update_local_ref() marcnarc
2012-04-16 22:08 ` [PATCH 3/3] fetch: Use the remote's ref name to decide how to describe new refs marcnarc
2012-04-16 22:34 ` Jonathan Nieder
2012-04-17 7:53 ` Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
2012-04-17 7:57 ` Jonathan Nieder
2012-04-17 8:39 ` Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
2012-04-17 14:23 ` Marc Branchaud
2012-04-17 15:18 ` Jonathan Nieder
2012-04-17 15:26 ` [PATCHv4 0/3] fetch: Only call a new ref a "branch" if it's under refs/heads/ Junio C Hamano
2012-04-17 15:28 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-04-17 19:30 ` Marc Branchaud [this message]
2012-04-17 22:29 ` Jeff King
2012-04-16 16:08 ` [PATCHv2] " Jonathan Nieder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F8DC4CD.9090106@xiplink.com \
--to=marcnarc@xiplink.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.