From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
To: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
"Sjur Brændeland" <sjur.brandeland@stericsson.com>,
"Loic Pallardy" <loic.pallardy@stericsson.com>,
"Ludovic BARRE" <ludovic.barre@stericsson.com>,
"Michal Simek" <monstr@monstr.eu>,
"Fernando Guzman Lugo" <fernando.lugo@ti.com>,
"Suman Anna" <s-anna@ti.com>, "Mark Grosen" <mgrosen@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: remove the get_by_name/put API
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 11:11:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FF335E3.5040509@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1341259857-17382-1-git-send-email-ohad@wizery.com>
On 07/02/12 13:10, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> Remove rproc_get_by_name() and rproc_put(), and the associated
> remoteproc infrastructure that supports it (i.e. klist and friends),
> because:
>
> 1. No one uses them
> 2. Using them is highly discouraged, and any potential user
> will be deeply scrutinized and encouraged to move.
>
> If a user, that absolutely can't live with the direct boot/shutdown
> model, does show up one day, then bringing this functionality back
> is going to be trivial.
>
> At this point though, keeping this functionality around is way too
> much of a maintenance burden.
>
Acked-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> Cc: Sjur Brændeland <sjur.brandeland@stericsson.com>
> Cc: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@stericsson.com>
> Cc: Ludovic BARRE <ludovic.barre@stericsson.com>
> Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
> Cc: Fernando Guzman Lugo <fernando.lugo@ti.com>
> Cc: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
> Cc: Mark Grosen <mgrosen@ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>
>
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
To: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
"Sjur Brændeland" <sjur.brandeland@stericsson.com>,
"Loic Pallardy" <loic.pallardy@stericsson.com>,
"Ludovic BARRE" <ludovic.barre@stericsson.com>,
"Michal Simek" <monstr@monstr.eu>,
"Fernando Guzman Lugo" <fernando.lugo@ti.com>,
"Suman Anna" <s-anna@ti.com>, "Mark Grosen" <mgrosen@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: remove the get_by_name/put API
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 11:11:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FF335E3.5040509@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1341259857-17382-1-git-send-email-ohad@wizery.com>
On 07/02/12 13:10, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> Remove rproc_get_by_name() and rproc_put(), and the associated
> remoteproc infrastructure that supports it (i.e. klist and friends),
> because:
>
> 1. No one uses them
> 2. Using them is highly discouraged, and any potential user
> will be deeply scrutinized and encouraged to move.
>
> If a user, that absolutely can't live with the direct boot/shutdown
> model, does show up one day, then bringing this functionality back
> is going to be trivial.
>
> At this point though, keeping this functionality around is way too
> much of a maintenance burden.
>
Acked-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> Cc: Sjur Brændeland <sjur.brandeland@stericsson.com>
> Cc: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@stericsson.com>
> Cc: Ludovic BARRE <ludovic.barre@stericsson.com>
> Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
> Cc: Fernando Guzman Lugo <fernando.lugo@ti.com>
> Cc: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
> Cc: Mark Grosen <mgrosen@ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>
>
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] remoteproc: remove the get_by_name/put API
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 11:11:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FF335E3.5040509@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1341259857-17382-1-git-send-email-ohad@wizery.com>
On 07/02/12 13:10, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> Remove rproc_get_by_name() and rproc_put(), and the associated
> remoteproc infrastructure that supports it (i.e. klist and friends),
> because:
>
> 1. No one uses them
> 2. Using them is highly discouraged, and any potential user
> will be deeply scrutinized and encouraged to move.
>
> If a user, that absolutely can't live with the direct boot/shutdown
> model, does show up one day, then bringing this functionality back
> is going to be trivial.
>
> At this point though, keeping this functionality around is way too
> much of a maintenance burden.
>
Acked-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> Cc: Sjur Br?ndeland <sjur.brandeland@stericsson.com>
> Cc: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@stericsson.com>
> Cc: Ludovic BARRE <ludovic.barre@stericsson.com>
> Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
> Cc: Fernando Guzman Lugo <fernando.lugo@ti.com>
> Cc: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
> Cc: Mark Grosen <mgrosen@ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>
>
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-03 18:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-02 20:10 [PATCH] remoteproc: remove the get_by_name/put API Ohad Ben-Cohen
2012-07-02 20:10 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2012-07-02 20:10 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2012-07-03 18:11 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2012-07-03 18:11 ` Stephen Boyd
2012-07-03 18:11 ` Stephen Boyd
2012-07-15 10:11 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2012-07-15 10:11 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FF335E3.5040509@codeaurora.org \
--to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=fernando.lugo@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=loic.pallardy@stericsson.com \
--cc=ludovic.barre@stericsson.com \
--cc=mgrosen@ti.com \
--cc=monstr@monstr.eu \
--cc=ohad@wizery.com \
--cc=s-anna@ti.com \
--cc=sjur.brandeland@stericsson.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.