* Re: [LTP] POSIX: does case mmap/27-1 valid?
2012-07-04 7:17 [LTP] POSIX: does case mmap/27-1 valid? Kang Kai
@ 2010-02-16 3:25 ` chrubis
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: chrubis @ 2010-02-16 3:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kang Kai; +Cc: ltp-list
Hi!
> The posix test case mmap/27-1 try to test c lib implementation which
> doesn't support MAP_FIXED and MAP_PRIVATE.
> When MAP_FIXED is defined then the case quits with UNTESTED.
> If MAP_FIXED and other flags are not defined, then the case try to
> test mmap with MAP_FIXED.
> But at this time MAP_FIXED is not defined, how the case can be
> compiled? Then I suppose this case is NOT valid.
There are several invalid testcases in the mmap directory. I've started
to cleanup the testcases but haven't had time finish yet (I've got more
important work meanwhile). So stay tuned I'll get to them again
hopefully soon.
--
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;258768047;13503038;j?
http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [LTP] POSIX: does case mmap/27-1 valid?
@ 2012-07-04 7:17 Kang Kai
2010-02-16 3:25 ` chrubis
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Kang Kai @ 2012-07-04 7:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ltp-list
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 439 bytes --]
Hi All,
The posix test case mmap/27-1 try to test c lib implementation which
doesn't support MAP_FIXED and MAP_PRIVATE.
When MAP_FIXED is defined then the case quits with UNTESTED.
If MAP_FIXED and other flags are not defined, then the case try to test
mmap with MAP_FIXED.
But at this time MAP_FIXED is not defined, how the case can be compiled?
Then I suppose this case is NOT valid.
What's your opinions? Thanks.
Regards,
Kai
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 838 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 395 bytes --]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 155 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-09-20 12:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-07-04 7:17 [LTP] POSIX: does case mmap/27-1 valid? Kang Kai
2010-02-16 3:25 ` chrubis
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.