All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexandre TORGUE <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>
To: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Subject: [v5.4 stable] arm: stm32: Regression observed on "no-map" reserved memory region
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 16:02:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4a4734d6-49df-677b-71d3-b926c44d89a9@foss.st.com> (raw)

Hi,

Since v5.4.102 I observe a regression on stm32mp1 platform: "no-map" 
reserved-memory regions are no more "reserved" and make part of the 
kernel System RAM. This causes allocation failure for devices which try 
to take a reserved-memory region.

It has been introduced by the following path:

"fdt: Properly handle "no-map" field in the memory region
[ Upstream commit 86588296acbfb1591e92ba60221e95677ecadb43 ]"
which replace memblock_remove by memblock_mark_nomap in no-map case.

Reverting this patch it's fine.

I add part of my DT (something is maybe wrong inside):

memory@c0000000 {
	reg = <0xc0000000 0x20000000>;
};

reserved-memory {
	#address-cells = <1>;
	#size-cells = <1>;
	ranges;

	gpu_reserved: gpu@d4000000 {
		reg = <0xd4000000 0x4000000>;
		no-map;
	};
};

Sorry if this issue has already been raised and discussed.

Thanks
alex

             reply	other threads:[~2021-04-20 14:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-20 14:02 Alexandre TORGUE [this message]
2021-04-20 14:45 ` [v5.4 stable] arm: stm32: Regression observed on "no-map" reserved memory region Rob Herring
2021-04-20 15:12   ` Alexandre TORGUE
2021-04-20 15:54     ` Rob Herring
2021-04-20 15:54       ` Rob Herring
2021-04-20 16:10       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-04-20 16:10         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-04-20 16:33         ` Florian Fainelli
2021-04-20 16:33           ` Florian Fainelli
2021-04-21  8:31           ` Quentin Perret
2021-04-21  8:31             ` Quentin Perret
2021-04-21  8:45             ` Quentin Perret
2021-04-21  8:45               ` Quentin Perret
2021-04-21 14:33             ` Florian Fainelli
2021-04-21 14:33               ` Florian Fainelli
2021-04-21 15:17               ` Florian Fainelli
2021-04-21 15:17                 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-04-22 13:03                 ` Quentin Perret
2021-04-22 13:03                   ` Quentin Perret
2021-04-22 12:59               ` Quentin Perret
2021-04-22 12:59                 ` Quentin Perret
2021-05-07 15:15                 ` Alexandre TORGUE
2021-05-07 15:15                   ` Alexandre TORGUE
2021-05-10 10:09                   ` Quentin Perret
2021-05-10 10:09                     ` Quentin Perret
2021-05-12 10:55                     ` Alexandre TORGUE
2021-05-12 10:55                       ` Alexandre TORGUE
2021-05-12 12:34                       ` Quentin Perret
2021-05-12 12:34                         ` Quentin Perret
2021-05-12 12:44                         ` Alexandre TORGUE
2021-05-12 12:44                           ` Alexandre TORGUE
2021-04-20 21:05         ` Rob Herring
2021-04-20 21:05           ` Rob Herring

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4a4734d6-49df-677b-71d3-b926c44d89a9@foss.st.com \
    --to=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=qperret@google.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.