All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/gvt-ww-lock
@ 2020-09-22 11:51 Wang, Zhi A
  2020-09-30 11:54 ` Maarten Lankhorst
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Wang, Zhi A @ 2020-09-22 11:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Joonas Lahtinen, Nikula, Jani, intel-gfx, Joonas Lahtinen, Yuan,
	Hang, Lv, Zhiyuan, intel-gvt-dev, Wang, Zhi A


Hi,

Here's the patch which introduces GVT-g ww lock support against 
drm-intel-gt-next branch.

Thanks

--

The following changes since commit 4316b19dee27cc5cd34a95fdbc0a3a5237507701:

   drm/i915: Fix uninitialised variable in intel_context_create_request. 
(2020-09-21 11:09:46 +0200)

are available in the git repository at:

   https://github.com/intel/gvt-linux.git tags/gvt-ww-lock-09-22-2020

for you to fetch changes up to e1b49ae155451aaa039eeb23fce808c71a038283:

   drm/i915/gvt: Introduce per object locking in GVT scheduler. 
(2020-09-22 12:09:56 +0300)

----------------------------------------------------------------
gvt-ww-lock-09-22-2020:

- Introduce ww lock support into GVT-g.

----------------------------------------------------------------
Zhi Wang (1):
       drm/i915/gvt: Introduce per object locking in GVT scheduler.

  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/scheduler.c | 68 
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
  1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/gvt-ww-lock
  2020-09-22 11:51 [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/gvt-ww-lock Wang, Zhi A
@ 2020-09-30 11:54 ` Maarten Lankhorst
  2020-11-08  7:51   ` Wang, Zhi A
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Maarten Lankhorst @ 2020-09-30 11:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Wang, Zhi A, Joonas Lahtinen, Nikula, Jani, intel-gfx, Yuan,
	Hang, Lv, Zhiyuan, intel-gvt-dev

Hey,

Op 22-09-2020 om 13:51 schreef Wang, Zhi A:
>
> Hi,
>
> Here's the patch which introduces GVT-g ww lock support against drm-intel-gt-next branch.
>
> Thanks
>
> -- 
>
> The following changes since commit 4316b19dee27cc5cd34a95fdbc0a3a5237507701:
>
>   drm/i915: Fix uninitialised variable in intel_context_create_request. (2020-09-21 11:09:46 +0200)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
>   https://github.com/intel/gvt-linux.git tags/gvt-ww-lock-09-22-2020
>
> for you to fetch changes up to e1b49ae155451aaa039eeb23fce808c71a038283:
>
>   drm/i915/gvt: Introduce per object locking in GVT scheduler. (2020-09-22 12:09:56 +0300)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> gvt-ww-lock-09-22-2020:
>
> - Introduce ww lock support into GVT-g.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Zhi Wang (1):
>       drm/i915/gvt: Introduce per object locking in GVT scheduler.
>
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/scheduler.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) 

I've taken a look at this branch, and I have some feedback.

Adding ww_ctx blindly like is done doesn't work. For example I'm working on a patch that adds ww handling to
i915_gem_object_ggtt_pin(), so you don't have to perform manually in prepare_shadow_wa_ctx(). intel_context_pin() already has a ww dance, you can keep calling it without open coding it. If you do decide to call it manually, intel_context_put would have to be called after ctx_fini. Cheers, Maarten

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/gvt-ww-lock
  2020-09-30 11:54 ` Maarten Lankhorst
@ 2020-11-08  7:51   ` Wang, Zhi A
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Wang, Zhi A @ 2020-11-08  7:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Maarten Lankhorst, Joonas Lahtinen, Nikula, Jani, intel-gfx,
	Yuan, Hang, Lv, Zhiyuan, intel-gvt-dev


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2915 bytes --]

Hi Maarten:

Thanks for the reply. 😊 Have your patches been merged into the drm-intel? (The new i915_gem_object_ggtt_pin() you mentioned in the email). Also, we might go on-demand pin recently in the suspend/resume support. In that case, I guess I need to review my patches again based on the new mechanism. Wrt your concern, my understanding is ww dance is for recording the related locks in a section. When a deadlock happens, we can rewind the locks recorded in a ww dance and rewind them. In the current code, the context is always pinned. So we don’t need to worry about the context as what you said. For preparing_shadow_wa_ctx, the gem object will be newly created whenever scan a execlist context and it will be destroyed when the context is scheduled-out. I think in that case, we need a separate ww dance.
Thanks, Zhi.

-----Original Message-----
From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2020 2:55 PM
To: Wang, Zhi A <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>; Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>; Nikula, Jani <jani.nikula@intel.com>; intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>; Yuan, Hang <hang.yuan@intel.com>; Lv, Zhiyuan <zhiyuan.lv@intel.com>; intel-gvt-dev <intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/gvt-ww-lock

Hey,

Op 22-09-2020 om 13:51 schreef Wang, Zhi A:
>
> Hi,
>
> Here's the patch which introduces GVT-g ww lock support against drm-intel-gt-next branch.
>
> Thanks
>
> --
>
> The following changes since commit 4316b19dee27cc5cd34a95fdbc0a3a5237507701:
>
>   drm/i915: Fix uninitialised variable in
> intel_context_create_request. (2020-09-21 11:09:46 +0200)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
>   https://github.com/intel/gvt-linux.git tags/gvt-ww-lock-09-22-2020
>
> for you to fetch changes up to e1b49ae155451aaa039eeb23fce808c71a038283:
>
>   drm/i915/gvt: Introduce per object locking in GVT scheduler.
> (2020-09-22 12:09:56 +0300)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> gvt-ww-lock-09-22-2020:
>
> - Introduce ww lock support into GVT-g.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Zhi Wang (1):
>       drm/i915/gvt: Introduce per object locking in GVT scheduler.
>
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/scheduler.c | 68
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

I've taken a look at this branch, and I have some feedback.

Adding ww_ctx blindly like is done doesn't work. For example I'm working on a patch that adds ww handling to i915_gem_object_ggtt_pin(), so you don't have to perform manually in prepare_shadow_wa_ctx(). intel_context_pin() already has a ww dance, you can keep calling it without open coding it. If you do decide to call it manually, intel_context_put would have to be called after ctx_fini. Cheers, Maarten

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 5512 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-11-08  7:52 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-09-22 11:51 [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/gvt-ww-lock Wang, Zhi A
2020-09-30 11:54 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2020-11-08  7:51   ` Wang, Zhi A

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.