Re: [RESEND PATCH 3/8] hwrng: bcm2835: bcmbca: Replace ARCH_BCM_63XX with ARCH_BCMBCA

[Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>]

On 7/7/2022 11:18 AM, William Zhang wrote:
> 
> 
> On 7/7/22 10:16, Conor.Dooley@microchip.com wrote:
>> On 07/07/2022 18:05, William Zhang wrote:
>>> On 7/7/22 09:23, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>>> On 7/6/22 23:57, William Zhang wrote:
>>>>> Prepare for the BCM63138 ARCH_BCM_63XX migration to ARCH_BCMBCA. Make
>>>>> HW_RANDOM_BCM2835 depending on ARCH_BCMBCA.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: William Zhang <william.zhang@broadcom.com>
>>>>
>>>> Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> There is no cover letter for this 8 patch series :/ it is not clear 
>>>> to me whether each subsystem maintainer will be in a posotion to 
>>>> merge these patches individually, yet still have all 8 (7 of them 
>>>> actually, see comment to patch 1) land in 5.20.
>>>>
>>> The cover letter will gather all the recipients which will be more 
>>> than 50
>>
>> tbf, you probably could cut down the CC list if you want, it isnt 
>> required
>> to CC absolutely everyone that gets spat out by get_maintainer.
>>
>> For example, I am CCed because I was a recent author for the hwrng 
>> kconfig
>> file, so people like me could be safely excluded if you need to cut 
>> down on
>> the number of people that you are CCing.
>>
>> Not that I have a problem with being CCed, just if it helps you hit a 
>> min.
>> threshold feel free to drop me :)
> Thanks! That is my plan too. Try to figure out the threshold now lol

Try adding --norolestats to your get_maintainer.pl invocation.
-- 
Florian