All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 1/2] staging: ks7010: Unnecessary parentheses are removed.
@ 2017-02-19 18:26 Arushi Singhal
  2017-02-19 18:31 ` Joe Perches
  2017-02-19 18:55 ` [Outreachy kernel] " Julia Lawall
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Arushi Singhal @ 2017-02-19 18:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gregkh; +Cc: devel, linux-kernel, outreachy-kernel

Unnecessary parentheses should be avoided as reported by checkpatch.pl.
Remove unnecessary parentheses, as reported by checkpatch as are nicer
to read.For example:-
It's often nicer to read if &(foo[0]) is converted to foo like:
     memcpy(&(ap->bssid[0]), &(ap_info->bssid[0]), ETH_ALEN);
     memcpy(ap->bssid, ap_info->bssid, ETH_ALEN);

Signed-off-by: Arushi Singhal <arushisinghal19971997@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_hostif.c   | 24 ++++++++++++------------
 drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_wlan_net.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_hostif.c b/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_hostif.c
index 3b2e28749b63..bbc39cbabdc1 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_hostif.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_hostif.c
@@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ int get_ap_information(struct ks_wlan_private *priv, struct ap_info_t *ap_info,
 	memset(ap, 0, sizeof(struct local_ap_t));
 
 	/* bssid */
-	memcpy(&(ap->bssid[0]), &(ap_info->bssid[0]), ETH_ALEN);
+	memcpy(&ap->bssid[0], &ap_info->bssid[0], ETH_ALEN);
 	/* rssi */
 	ap->rssi = ap_info->rssi;
 	/* sq */
@@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ int get_ap_information(struct ks_wlan_private *priv, struct ap_info_t *ap_info,
 	/* channel */
 	ap->channel = ap_info->ch_info;
 
-	bp = &(ap_info->body[0]);
+	bp = &ap_info->body[0];
 	bsize = ap_info->body_size;
 	offset = 0;
 
@@ -239,19 +239,19 @@ int get_ap_information(struct ks_wlan_private *priv, struct ap_info_t *ap_info,
 					*(bp + 1));
 				ap->ssid.size = SSID_MAX_SIZE;
 			}
-			memcpy(&(ap->ssid.body[0]), bp + 2, ap->ssid.size);
+			memcpy(&ap->ssid.body[0], bp + 2, ap->ssid.size);
 			break;
 		case 1:	/* rate */
 		case 50:	/* ext rate */
 			if ((*(bp + 1) + ap->rate_set.size) <=
 			    RATE_SET_MAX_SIZE) {
-				memcpy(&(ap->rate_set.body[ap->rate_set.size]),
+				memcpy(&ap->rate_set.body[ap->rate_set.size],
 				       bp + 2, *(bp + 1));
 				ap->rate_set.size += *(bp + 1);
 			} else {
 				DPRINTK(1, "size over :: rate size=%d\n",
 					(*(bp + 1) + ap->rate_set.size));
-				memcpy(&(ap->rate_set.body[ap->rate_set.size]),
+				memcpy(&ap->rate_set.body[ap->rate_set.size],
 				       bp + 2,
 				       RATE_SET_MAX_SIZE - ap->rate_set.size);
 				ap->rate_set.size +=
@@ -269,7 +269,7 @@ int get_ap_information(struct ks_wlan_private *priv, struct ap_info_t *ap_info,
 					*(bp + 1));
 				ap->rsn_ie.size = RSN_IE_BODY_MAX;
 			}
-			memcpy(&(ap->rsn_ie.body[0]), bp + 2, ap->rsn_ie.size);
+			memcpy(&ap->rsn_ie.body[0], bp + 2, ap->rsn_ie.size);
 			break;
 		case 221:	/* WPA */
 			if (!memcmp(bp + 2, "\x00\x50\xf2\x01", 4)) {	/* WPA OUI check */
@@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ int get_ap_information(struct ks_wlan_private *priv, struct ap_info_t *ap_info,
 						*(bp + 1));
 					ap->wpa_ie.size = RSN_IE_BODY_MAX;
 				}
-				memcpy(&(ap->wpa_ie.body[0]), bp + 2,
+				memcpy(&ap->wpa_ie.body[0], bp + 2,
 				       ap->wpa_ie.size);
 			}
 			break;
@@ -832,8 +832,8 @@ void hostif_scan_indication(struct ks_wlan_private *priv)
 	if (priv->scan_ind_count != 0) {
 		for (i = 0; i < priv->aplist.size; i++) {	/* bssid check */
 			if (!memcmp
-			    (&(ap_info->bssid[0]),
-			     &(priv->aplist.ap[i].bssid[0]), ETH_ALEN)) {
+			    (&ap_info->bssid[0],
+			     &priv->aplist.ap[i].bssid[0], ETH_ALEN)) {
 				if (ap_info->frame_type ==
 				    FRAME_TYPE_PROBE_RESP)
 					get_ap_information(priv, ap_info,
@@ -2652,7 +2652,7 @@ int hostif_init(struct ks_wlan_private *priv)
 
 	priv->aplist.size = 0;
 	for (i = 0; i < LOCAL_APLIST_MAX; i++)
-		memset(&(priv->aplist.ap[i]), 0, sizeof(struct local_ap_t));
+		memset(&priv->aplist.ap[i], 0, sizeof(struct local_ap_t));
 	priv->infra_status = 0;
 	priv->current_rate = 4;
 	priv->connect_status = DISCONNECT_STATUS;
@@ -2675,12 +2675,12 @@ int hostif_init(struct ks_wlan_private *priv)
 	INIT_WORK(&priv->ks_wlan_wakeup_task, ks_wlan_hw_wakeup_task);
 
 	/* WPA */
-	memset(&(priv->wpa), 0, sizeof(priv->wpa));
+	memset(&priv->wpa, 0, sizeof(priv->wpa));
 	priv->wpa.rsn_enabled = 0;
 	priv->wpa.mic_failure.failure = 0;
 	priv->wpa.mic_failure.last_failure_time = 0;
 	priv->wpa.mic_failure.stop = 0;
-	memset(&(priv->pmklist), 0, sizeof(priv->pmklist));
+	memset(&priv->pmklist, 0, sizeof(priv->pmklist));
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&priv->pmklist.head);
 	for (i = 0; i < PMK_LIST_MAX; i++)
 		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&priv->pmklist.pmk[i].list);
diff --git a/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_wlan_net.c b/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_wlan_net.c
index 8c55428b71c7..2233c9fa982a 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_wlan_net.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_wlan_net.c
@@ -423,7 +423,7 @@ static int ks_wlan_get_wap(struct net_device *dev, struct iw_request_info *info,
 
 	/* for SLEEP MODE */
 	if ((priv->connect_status & CONNECT_STATUS_MASK) == CONNECT_STATUS)
-		memcpy(awrq->sa_data, &(priv->current_ap.bssid[0]), ETH_ALEN);
+		memcpy(awrq->sa_data, &priv->current_ap.bssid[0], ETH_ALEN);
 	else
 		eth_zero_addr(awrq->sa_data);
 
@@ -1364,7 +1364,7 @@ static int ks_wlan_get_aplist(struct net_device *dev,
 		return -EPERM;
 	/* for SLEEP MODE */
 	for (i = 0; i < priv->aplist.size; i++) {
-		memcpy(address[i].sa_data, &(priv->aplist.ap[i].bssid[0]),
+		memcpy(address[i].sa_data, &priv->aplist.ap[i].bssid[0],
 		       ETH_ALEN);
 		address[i].sa_family = ARPHRD_ETHER;
 		qual[i].level = 256 - priv->aplist.ap[i].rssi;
@@ -1454,7 +1454,7 @@ static inline char *ks_wlan_translate_scan(struct net_device *dev,
 	iwe.u.data.flags = 1;
 	current_ev =
 	    iwe_stream_add_point(info, current_ev, end_buf, &iwe,
-				 &(ap->ssid.body[0]));
+				 &ap->ssid.body[0]);
 
 	/* Add mode */
 	iwe.cmd = SIOCGIWMODE;
@@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ static inline char *ks_wlan_translate_scan(struct net_device *dev,
 	iwe.u.data.length = 0;
 	current_ev =
 	    iwe_stream_add_point(info, current_ev, end_buf, &iwe,
-				 &(ap->ssid.body[0]));
+				 &ap->ssid.body[0]);
 
 	/* Rate : stuffing multiple values in a single event require a bit
 	 * more of magic - Jean II */
@@ -1612,7 +1612,7 @@ static int ks_wlan_get_scan(struct net_device *dev,
 		current_ev = ks_wlan_translate_scan(dev, current_ev,
 //                                                  extra + IW_SCAN_MAX_DATA,
 						    extra + dwrq->length,
-						    &(priv->current_ap));
+						    &priv->current_ap);
 	}
 #endif
 	/* Read and parse all entries */
@@ -1625,7 +1625,7 @@ static int ks_wlan_get_scan(struct net_device *dev,
 		current_ev = ks_wlan_translate_scan(dev, info, current_ev,
 //                                                  extra + IW_SCAN_MAX_DATA,
 						    extra + dwrq->length,
-						    &(priv->aplist.ap[i]));
+						    &priv->aplist.ap[i]);
 	}
 	/* Length of data */
 	dwrq->length = (current_ev - extra);
@@ -2080,7 +2080,7 @@ static int ks_wlan_set_pmksa(struct net_device *dev,
 		}
 		break;
 	case IW_PMKSA_FLUSH:
-		memset(&(priv->pmklist), 0, sizeof(priv->pmklist));
+		memset(&priv->pmklist, 0, sizeof(priv->pmklist));
 		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&priv->pmklist.head);
 		for (i = 0; i < PMK_LIST_MAX; i++)
 			INIT_LIST_HEAD(&priv->pmklist.pmk[i].list);
@@ -2178,7 +2178,7 @@ static int ks_wlan_get_firmware_version(struct net_device *dev,
 {
 	struct ks_wlan_private *priv =
 	    (struct ks_wlan_private *)netdev_priv(dev);
-	strcpy(extra, &(priv->firmware_version[0]));
+	strcpy(extra, &priv->firmware_version[0]);
 	dwrq->length = priv->version_size + 1;
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -2433,7 +2433,7 @@ static int ks_wlan_data_read(struct net_device *dev,
 		read_length = priv->dev_size[priv->dev_count];
 
 	/* Copy data */
-	memcpy(extra, &(priv->dev_data[priv->dev_count][0]), read_length);
+	memcpy(extra, &priv->dev_data[priv->dev_count][0], read_length);
 
 	spin_unlock(&priv->dev_read_lock);	/* release spin lock */
 
@@ -3254,7 +3254,7 @@ static int ks_wlan_netdev_ioctl(struct net_device *dev, struct ifreq *rq,
 
 	switch (cmd) {
 	case SIOCIWFIRSTPRIV + 20:	/* KS_WLAN_SET_STOP_REQ */
-		rc = ks_wlan_set_stop_request(dev, NULL, &(wrq->u.mode), NULL);
+		rc = ks_wlan_set_stop_request(dev, NULL, &wrq->u.mode, NULL);
 		break;
 		// All other calls are currently unsupported
 	default:
-- 
2.11.0



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: ks7010: Unnecessary parentheses are removed.
  2017-02-19 18:26 [PATCH 1/2] staging: ks7010: Unnecessary parentheses are removed Arushi Singhal
@ 2017-02-19 18:31 ` Joe Perches
  2017-02-19 18:58   ` [Outreachy kernel] " Julia Lawall
  2017-02-19 18:55 ` [Outreachy kernel] " Julia Lawall
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Joe Perches @ 2017-02-19 18:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arushi Singhal, gregkh; +Cc: devel, linux-kernel, outreachy-kernel

On Sun, 2017-02-19 at 23:56 +0530, Arushi Singhal wrote:
> Unnecessary parentheses should be avoided as reported by checkpatch.pl.
> Remove unnecessary parentheses, as reported by checkpatch as are nicer
> to read.For example:-
> It's often nicer to read if &(foo[0]) is converted to foo like:
>      memcpy(&(ap->bssid[0]), &(ap_info->bssid[0]), ETH_ALEN);
>      memcpy(ap->bssid, ap_info->bssid, ETH_ALEN);
[]
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_hostif.c b/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_hostif.c
[]
> @@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ int get_ap_information(struct ks_wlan_private *priv, struct ap_info_t *ap_info,
>  	memset(ap, 0, sizeof(struct local_ap_t));
>  
>  	/* bssid */
> -	memcpy(&(ap->bssid[0]), &(ap_info->bssid[0]), ETH_ALEN);
> +	memcpy(&ap->bssid[0], &ap_info->bssid[0], ETH_ALEN);

This code doesn't match the suggested style of
your commit message.



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH 1/2] staging: ks7010: Unnecessary parentheses are removed.
  2017-02-19 18:26 [PATCH 1/2] staging: ks7010: Unnecessary parentheses are removed Arushi Singhal
  2017-02-19 18:31 ` Joe Perches
@ 2017-02-19 18:55 ` Julia Lawall
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Julia Lawall @ 2017-02-19 18:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arushi Singhal; +Cc: gregkh, devel, linux-kernel, outreachy-kernel



On Sun, 19 Feb 2017, Arushi Singhal wrote:

> Unnecessary parentheses should be avoided as reported by checkpatch.pl.
> Remove unnecessary parentheses, as reported by checkpatch as are nicer
> to read.For example:-
> It's often nicer to read if &(foo[0]) is converted to foo like:
>      memcpy(&(ap->bssid[0]), &(ap_info->bssid[0]), ETH_ALEN);
>      memcpy(ap->bssid, ap_info->bssid, ETH_ALEN);

You didn't actually remove the & and [0].

julia


>
> Signed-off-by: Arushi Singhal <arushisinghal19971997@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_hostif.c   | 24 ++++++++++++------------
>  drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_wlan_net.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
>  2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_hostif.c b/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_hostif.c
> index 3b2e28749b63..bbc39cbabdc1 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_hostif.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_hostif.c
> @@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ int get_ap_information(struct ks_wlan_private *priv, struct ap_info_t *ap_info,
>  	memset(ap, 0, sizeof(struct local_ap_t));
>
>  	/* bssid */
> -	memcpy(&(ap->bssid[0]), &(ap_info->bssid[0]), ETH_ALEN);
> +	memcpy(&ap->bssid[0], &ap_info->bssid[0], ETH_ALEN);
>  	/* rssi */
>  	ap->rssi = ap_info->rssi;
>  	/* sq */
> @@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ int get_ap_information(struct ks_wlan_private *priv, struct ap_info_t *ap_info,
>  	/* channel */
>  	ap->channel = ap_info->ch_info;
>
> -	bp = &(ap_info->body[0]);
> +	bp = &ap_info->body[0];
>  	bsize = ap_info->body_size;
>  	offset = 0;
>
> @@ -239,19 +239,19 @@ int get_ap_information(struct ks_wlan_private *priv, struct ap_info_t *ap_info,
>  					*(bp + 1));
>  				ap->ssid.size = SSID_MAX_SIZE;
>  			}
> -			memcpy(&(ap->ssid.body[0]), bp + 2, ap->ssid.size);
> +			memcpy(&ap->ssid.body[0], bp + 2, ap->ssid.size);
>  			break;
>  		case 1:	/* rate */
>  		case 50:	/* ext rate */
>  			if ((*(bp + 1) + ap->rate_set.size) <=
>  			    RATE_SET_MAX_SIZE) {
> -				memcpy(&(ap->rate_set.body[ap->rate_set.size]),
> +				memcpy(&ap->rate_set.body[ap->rate_set.size],
>  				       bp + 2, *(bp + 1));
>  				ap->rate_set.size += *(bp + 1);
>  			} else {
>  				DPRINTK(1, "size over :: rate size=%d\n",
>  					(*(bp + 1) + ap->rate_set.size));
> -				memcpy(&(ap->rate_set.body[ap->rate_set.size]),
> +				memcpy(&ap->rate_set.body[ap->rate_set.size],
>  				       bp + 2,
>  				       RATE_SET_MAX_SIZE - ap->rate_set.size);
>  				ap->rate_set.size +=
> @@ -269,7 +269,7 @@ int get_ap_information(struct ks_wlan_private *priv, struct ap_info_t *ap_info,
>  					*(bp + 1));
>  				ap->rsn_ie.size = RSN_IE_BODY_MAX;
>  			}
> -			memcpy(&(ap->rsn_ie.body[0]), bp + 2, ap->rsn_ie.size);
> +			memcpy(&ap->rsn_ie.body[0], bp + 2, ap->rsn_ie.size);
>  			break;
>  		case 221:	/* WPA */
>  			if (!memcmp(bp + 2, "\x00\x50\xf2\x01", 4)) {	/* WPA OUI check */
> @@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ int get_ap_information(struct ks_wlan_private *priv, struct ap_info_t *ap_info,
>  						*(bp + 1));
>  					ap->wpa_ie.size = RSN_IE_BODY_MAX;
>  				}
> -				memcpy(&(ap->wpa_ie.body[0]), bp + 2,
> +				memcpy(&ap->wpa_ie.body[0], bp + 2,
>  				       ap->wpa_ie.size);
>  			}
>  			break;
> @@ -832,8 +832,8 @@ void hostif_scan_indication(struct ks_wlan_private *priv)
>  	if (priv->scan_ind_count != 0) {
>  		for (i = 0; i < priv->aplist.size; i++) {	/* bssid check */
>  			if (!memcmp
> -			    (&(ap_info->bssid[0]),
> -			     &(priv->aplist.ap[i].bssid[0]), ETH_ALEN)) {
> +			    (&ap_info->bssid[0],
> +			     &priv->aplist.ap[i].bssid[0], ETH_ALEN)) {
>  				if (ap_info->frame_type ==
>  				    FRAME_TYPE_PROBE_RESP)
>  					get_ap_information(priv, ap_info,
> @@ -2652,7 +2652,7 @@ int hostif_init(struct ks_wlan_private *priv)
>
>  	priv->aplist.size = 0;
>  	for (i = 0; i < LOCAL_APLIST_MAX; i++)
> -		memset(&(priv->aplist.ap[i]), 0, sizeof(struct local_ap_t));
> +		memset(&priv->aplist.ap[i], 0, sizeof(struct local_ap_t));
>  	priv->infra_status = 0;
>  	priv->current_rate = 4;
>  	priv->connect_status = DISCONNECT_STATUS;
> @@ -2675,12 +2675,12 @@ int hostif_init(struct ks_wlan_private *priv)
>  	INIT_WORK(&priv->ks_wlan_wakeup_task, ks_wlan_hw_wakeup_task);
>
>  	/* WPA */
> -	memset(&(priv->wpa), 0, sizeof(priv->wpa));
> +	memset(&priv->wpa, 0, sizeof(priv->wpa));
>  	priv->wpa.rsn_enabled = 0;
>  	priv->wpa.mic_failure.failure = 0;
>  	priv->wpa.mic_failure.last_failure_time = 0;
>  	priv->wpa.mic_failure.stop = 0;
> -	memset(&(priv->pmklist), 0, sizeof(priv->pmklist));
> +	memset(&priv->pmklist, 0, sizeof(priv->pmklist));
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&priv->pmklist.head);
>  	for (i = 0; i < PMK_LIST_MAX; i++)
>  		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&priv->pmklist.pmk[i].list);
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_wlan_net.c b/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_wlan_net.c
> index 8c55428b71c7..2233c9fa982a 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_wlan_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_wlan_net.c
> @@ -423,7 +423,7 @@ static int ks_wlan_get_wap(struct net_device *dev, struct iw_request_info *info,
>
>  	/* for SLEEP MODE */
>  	if ((priv->connect_status & CONNECT_STATUS_MASK) == CONNECT_STATUS)
> -		memcpy(awrq->sa_data, &(priv->current_ap.bssid[0]), ETH_ALEN);
> +		memcpy(awrq->sa_data, &priv->current_ap.bssid[0], ETH_ALEN);
>  	else
>  		eth_zero_addr(awrq->sa_data);
>
> @@ -1364,7 +1364,7 @@ static int ks_wlan_get_aplist(struct net_device *dev,
>  		return -EPERM;
>  	/* for SLEEP MODE */
>  	for (i = 0; i < priv->aplist.size; i++) {
> -		memcpy(address[i].sa_data, &(priv->aplist.ap[i].bssid[0]),
> +		memcpy(address[i].sa_data, &priv->aplist.ap[i].bssid[0],
>  		       ETH_ALEN);
>  		address[i].sa_family = ARPHRD_ETHER;
>  		qual[i].level = 256 - priv->aplist.ap[i].rssi;
> @@ -1454,7 +1454,7 @@ static inline char *ks_wlan_translate_scan(struct net_device *dev,
>  	iwe.u.data.flags = 1;
>  	current_ev =
>  	    iwe_stream_add_point(info, current_ev, end_buf, &iwe,
> -				 &(ap->ssid.body[0]));
> +				 &ap->ssid.body[0]);
>
>  	/* Add mode */
>  	iwe.cmd = SIOCGIWMODE;
> @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ static inline char *ks_wlan_translate_scan(struct net_device *dev,
>  	iwe.u.data.length = 0;
>  	current_ev =
>  	    iwe_stream_add_point(info, current_ev, end_buf, &iwe,
> -				 &(ap->ssid.body[0]));
> +				 &ap->ssid.body[0]);
>
>  	/* Rate : stuffing multiple values in a single event require a bit
>  	 * more of magic - Jean II */
> @@ -1612,7 +1612,7 @@ static int ks_wlan_get_scan(struct net_device *dev,
>  		current_ev = ks_wlan_translate_scan(dev, current_ev,
>  //                                                  extra + IW_SCAN_MAX_DATA,
>  						    extra + dwrq->length,
> -						    &(priv->current_ap));
> +						    &priv->current_ap);
>  	}
>  #endif
>  	/* Read and parse all entries */
> @@ -1625,7 +1625,7 @@ static int ks_wlan_get_scan(struct net_device *dev,
>  		current_ev = ks_wlan_translate_scan(dev, info, current_ev,
>  //                                                  extra + IW_SCAN_MAX_DATA,
>  						    extra + dwrq->length,
> -						    &(priv->aplist.ap[i]));
> +						    &priv->aplist.ap[i]);
>  	}
>  	/* Length of data */
>  	dwrq->length = (current_ev - extra);
> @@ -2080,7 +2080,7 @@ static int ks_wlan_set_pmksa(struct net_device *dev,
>  		}
>  		break;
>  	case IW_PMKSA_FLUSH:
> -		memset(&(priv->pmklist), 0, sizeof(priv->pmklist));
> +		memset(&priv->pmklist, 0, sizeof(priv->pmklist));
>  		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&priv->pmklist.head);
>  		for (i = 0; i < PMK_LIST_MAX; i++)
>  			INIT_LIST_HEAD(&priv->pmklist.pmk[i].list);
> @@ -2178,7 +2178,7 @@ static int ks_wlan_get_firmware_version(struct net_device *dev,
>  {
>  	struct ks_wlan_private *priv =
>  	    (struct ks_wlan_private *)netdev_priv(dev);
> -	strcpy(extra, &(priv->firmware_version[0]));
> +	strcpy(extra, &priv->firmware_version[0]);
>  	dwrq->length = priv->version_size + 1;
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -2433,7 +2433,7 @@ static int ks_wlan_data_read(struct net_device *dev,
>  		read_length = priv->dev_size[priv->dev_count];
>
>  	/* Copy data */
> -	memcpy(extra, &(priv->dev_data[priv->dev_count][0]), read_length);
> +	memcpy(extra, &priv->dev_data[priv->dev_count][0], read_length);
>
>  	spin_unlock(&priv->dev_read_lock);	/* release spin lock */
>
> @@ -3254,7 +3254,7 @@ static int ks_wlan_netdev_ioctl(struct net_device *dev, struct ifreq *rq,
>
>  	switch (cmd) {
>  	case SIOCIWFIRSTPRIV + 20:	/* KS_WLAN_SET_STOP_REQ */
> -		rc = ks_wlan_set_stop_request(dev, NULL, &(wrq->u.mode), NULL);
> +		rc = ks_wlan_set_stop_request(dev, NULL, &wrq->u.mode, NULL);
>  		break;
>  		// All other calls are currently unsupported
>  	default:
> --
> 2.11.0
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "outreachy-kernel" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to outreachy-kernel+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/outreachy-kernel/20170219182607.GA17005%40arushi-HP-Pavilion-Notebook.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [Outreachy kernel] Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: ks7010: Unnecessary parentheses are removed.
  2017-02-19 18:31 ` Joe Perches
@ 2017-02-19 18:58   ` Julia Lawall
  2017-02-19 19:18     ` Joe Perches
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Julia Lawall @ 2017-02-19 18:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Joe Perches; +Cc: Arushi Singhal, gregkh, devel, linux-kernel, outreachy-kernel



On Sun, 19 Feb 2017, Joe Perches wrote:

> On Sun, 2017-02-19 at 23:56 +0530, Arushi Singhal wrote:
> > Unnecessary parentheses should be avoided as reported by checkpatch.pl.
> > Remove unnecessary parentheses, as reported by checkpatch as are nicer
> > to read.For example:-
> > It's often nicer to read if &(foo[0]) is converted to foo like:
> >      memcpy(&(ap->bssid[0]), &(ap_info->bssid[0]), ETH_ALEN);
> >      memcpy(ap->bssid, ap_info->bssid, ETH_ALEN);
> []
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_hostif.c b/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_hostif.c
> []
> > @@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ int get_ap_information(struct ks_wlan_private *priv, struct ap_info_t *ap_info,
> >  	memset(ap, 0, sizeof(struct local_ap_t));
> >
> >  	/* bssid */
> > -	memcpy(&(ap->bssid[0]), &(ap_info->bssid[0]), ETH_ALEN);
> > +	memcpy(&ap->bssid[0], &ap_info->bssid[0], ETH_ALEN);
>
> This code doesn't match the suggested style of
> your commit message.

Is what is suggested in the commit message correct?  That is, is the 0th
element of an array always at the same address as a pointer to the array
itself?  Probably just paramoid...

julia

>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "outreachy-kernel" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to outreachy-kernel+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/outreachy-kernel/1487529117.2198.36.camel%40perches.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [Outreachy kernel] Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: ks7010: Unnecessary parentheses are removed.
  2017-02-19 18:58   ` [Outreachy kernel] " Julia Lawall
@ 2017-02-19 19:18     ` Joe Perches
  2017-02-19 19:20       ` Julia Lawall
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Joe Perches @ 2017-02-19 19:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Julia Lawall
  Cc: Arushi Singhal, gregkh, devel, linux-kernel, outreachy-kernel

On Sun, 2017-02-19 at 19:58 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Feb 2017, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Sun, 2017-02-19 at 23:56 +0530, Arushi Singhal wrote:
> > > Unnecessary parentheses should be avoided as reported by checkpatch.pl.
> > > Remove unnecessary parentheses, as reported by checkpatch as are nicer
> > > to read.For example:-
> > > It's often nicer to read if &(foo[0]) is converted to foo like:
> > >      memcpy(&(ap->bssid[0]), &(ap_info->bssid[0]), ETH_ALEN);
> > >      memcpy(ap->bssid, ap_info->bssid, ETH_ALEN);
> > []
> > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_hostif.c b/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_hostif.c
> > []
> > > @@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ int get_ap_information(struct ks_wlan_private *priv, struct ap_info_t *ap_info,
> > >  	memset(ap, 0, sizeof(struct local_ap_t));
> > > 
> > >  	/* bssid */
> > > -	memcpy(&(ap->bssid[0]), &(ap_info->bssid[0]), ETH_ALEN);
> > > +	memcpy(&ap->bssid[0], &ap_info->bssid[0], ETH_ALEN);
> > 
> > This code doesn't match the suggested style of
> > your commit message.
> 
> Is what is suggested in the commit message correct?  That is, is the 0th
> element of an array always at the same address as a pointer to the array
> itself?

I think your wording is a little fuzzy.

Assuming you mean not a pointer to the array,
but the array itself, yes.



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [Outreachy kernel] Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: ks7010: Unnecessary parentheses are removed.
  2017-02-19 19:18     ` Joe Perches
@ 2017-02-19 19:20       ` Julia Lawall
  2017-02-19 19:56         ` Arushi Singhal
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Julia Lawall @ 2017-02-19 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Joe Perches; +Cc: Arushi Singhal, gregkh, devel, linux-kernel, outreachy-kernel



On Sun, 19 Feb 2017, Joe Perches wrote:

> On Sun, 2017-02-19 at 19:58 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > On Sun, 19 Feb 2017, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2017-02-19 at 23:56 +0530, Arushi Singhal wrote:
> > > > Unnecessary parentheses should be avoided as reported by checkpatch.pl.
> > > > Remove unnecessary parentheses, as reported by checkpatch as are nicer
> > > > to read.For example:-
> > > > It's often nicer to read if &(foo[0]) is converted to foo like:
> > > >      memcpy(&(ap->bssid[0]), &(ap_info->bssid[0]), ETH_ALEN);
> > > >      memcpy(ap->bssid, ap_info->bssid, ETH_ALEN);
> > > []
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_hostif.c b/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_hostif.c
> > > []
> > > > @@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ int get_ap_information(struct ks_wlan_private *priv, struct ap_info_t *ap_info,
> > > >  	memset(ap, 0, sizeof(struct local_ap_t));
> > > >
> > > >  	/* bssid */
> > > > -	memcpy(&(ap->bssid[0]), &(ap_info->bssid[0]), ETH_ALEN);
> > > > +	memcpy(&ap->bssid[0], &ap_info->bssid[0], ETH_ALEN);
> > >
> > > This code doesn't match the suggested style of
> > > your commit message.
> >
> > Is what is suggested in the commit message correct?  That is, is the 0th
> > element of an array always at the same address as a pointer to the array
> > itself?
>
> I think your wording is a little fuzzy.
>
> Assuming you mean not a pointer to the array,
> but the array itself, yes.

Yes, I mean the array itself,sorry.  Thanks.

Arushi, it would be good it you could make the change you proposed to
make.  The calls would look much more normal that way.

thanks,
julia

>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "outreachy-kernel" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to outreachy-kernel+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/outreachy-kernel/1487531915.2198.38.camel%40perches.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [Outreachy kernel] Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: ks7010: Unnecessary parentheses are removed.
  2017-02-19 19:20       ` Julia Lawall
@ 2017-02-19 19:56         ` Arushi Singhal
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Arushi Singhal @ 2017-02-19 19:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: outreachy-kernel; +Cc: joe, arushisinghal19971997, gregkh, devel, linux-kernel


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2504 bytes --]


Hi
Actually sorry this is because of some mistake in rebasing.
I will correct it send the correct version.
On Monday, February 20, 2017 at 12:50:05 AM UTC+5:30, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, 19 Feb 2017, Joe Perches wrote: 
>
> > On Sun, 2017-02-19 at 19:58 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote: 
> > > On Sun, 19 Feb 2017, Joe Perches wrote: 
> > > > On Sun, 2017-02-19 at 23:56 +0530, Arushi Singhal wrote: 
> > > > > Unnecessary parentheses should be avoided as reported by 
> checkpatch.pl. 
> > > > > Remove unnecessary parentheses, as reported by checkpatch as are 
> nicer 
> > > > > to read.For example:- 
> > > > > It's often nicer to read if &(foo[0]) is converted to foo like: 
> > > > >      memcpy(&(ap->bssid[0]), &(ap_info->bssid[0]), ETH_ALEN); 
> > > > >      memcpy(ap->bssid, ap_info->bssid, ETH_ALEN); 
> > > > [] 
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_hostif.c 
> b/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_hostif.c 
> > > > [] 
> > > > > @@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ int get_ap_information(struct ks_wlan_private 
> *priv, struct ap_info_t *ap_info, 
> > > > >          memset(ap, 0, sizeof(struct local_ap_t)); 
> > > > > 
> > > > >          /* bssid */ 
> > > > > -        memcpy(&(ap->bssid[0]), &(ap_info->bssid[0]), ETH_ALEN); 
> > > > > +        memcpy(&ap->bssid[0], &ap_info->bssid[0], ETH_ALEN); 
> > > > 
> > > > This code doesn't match the suggested style of 
> > > > your commit message. 
> > > 
> > > Is what is suggested in the commit message correct?  That is, is the 
> 0th 
> > > element of an array always at the same address as a pointer to the 
> array 
> > > itself? 
> > 
> > I think your wording is a little fuzzy. 
> > 
> > Assuming you mean not a pointer to the array, 
> > but the array itself, yes. 
>
> Yes, I mean the array itself,sorry.  Thanks. 
>
> Arushi, it would be good it you could make the change you proposed to 
> make.  The calls would look much more normal that way. 
>
> thanks, 
> julia 
>
> > 
> > -- 
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> Groups "outreachy-kernel" group. 
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
> an email to outreachy-kern...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. 
> > To post to this group, send email to outreach...@googlegroups.com 
> <javascript:>. 
> > To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/outreachy-kernel/1487531915.2198.38.camel%40perches.com. 
>
> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 
> > 
>

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 4628 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2017-02-19 19:56 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-02-19 18:26 [PATCH 1/2] staging: ks7010: Unnecessary parentheses are removed Arushi Singhal
2017-02-19 18:31 ` Joe Perches
2017-02-19 18:58   ` [Outreachy kernel] " Julia Lawall
2017-02-19 19:18     ` Joe Perches
2017-02-19 19:20       ` Julia Lawall
2017-02-19 19:56         ` Arushi Singhal
2017-02-19 18:55 ` [Outreachy kernel] " Julia Lawall

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.