All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
To: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
Cc: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, rppt@kernel.org,
	fancer.lancer@gmail.com, guro@fb.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	paul@crapouillou.net,
	Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru>,
	Kamal Dasu <kdasu.kdev@gmail.com>,
	Yanteng Si <siyanteng@loongson.cn>,
	Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
	"open list:BROADCOM BMIPS MIPS ARCHITECTURE" 
	<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: BMIPS: Reserve exception base to prevent corruption
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2021 17:30:18 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4e3640d4-7fc2-96dc-de00-599b3ac80757@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210302235411.GA3897@alpha.franken.de>



On 3/2/2021 3:54 PM, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 08:19:38PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> BMIPS is one of the few platforms that do change the exception base.
>> After commit 2dcb39645441 ("memblock: do not start bottom-up allocations
>> with kernel_end") we started seeing BMIPS boards fail to boot with the
>> built-in FDT being corrupted.
>>
>> Before the cited commit, early allocations would be in the [kernel_end,
>> RAM_END] range, but after commit they would be within [RAM_START +
>> PAGE_SIZE, RAM_END].
>>
>> The custom exception base handler that is installed by
>> bmips_ebase_setup() done for BMIPS5000 CPUs ends-up trampling on the
>> memory region allocated by unflatten_and_copy_device_tree() thus
>> corrupting the FDT used by the kernel.
>>
>> To fix this, we need to perform an early reservation of the custom
>> exception that is going to be installed and this needs to happen at
>> plat_mem_setup() time to ensure that unflatten_and_copy_device_tree()
>> finds a space that is suitable, away from reserved memory.
>>
>> Huge thanks to Serget for analysing and proposing a solution to this
>> issue.
>>
>> Fixes: Fixes: 2dcb39645441 ("memblock: do not start bottom-up allocations with kernel_end")
>> Debugged-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru>
>> Reported-by: Kamal Dasu <kdasu.kdev@gmail.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> Thomas,
>>
>> This is intended as a stop-gap solution for 5.12-rc1 and to be picked up
>> by the stable team for 5.11. We should find a safer way to avoid these
>> problems for 5.13 maybe.
> 
> let's try to make it in one ago. Hwo about reserving vector space in
> cpu_probe, if it's known there and leave the rest to trap_init() ?
> 
> Below patch got a quick test on IP22 (real hardware) and malta (qemu).
> Not sure, if I got all BMIPS parts correct, so please check/test.

Works for me here:

Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>

Thanks!

> BTW. do we really need to EXPORT_SYMBOL ebase ?

It seems like MIPS KVM support can be built as a module which is why
ebase was exported to modules with
878edf014e29de38c49153aba20273fbc9ae31af ("MIPS: KVM: Restore host EBase
from ebase variable")?
-- 
Florian

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-03 11:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-17 20:12 [PATCH v2 1/2] mm: cma: allocate cma areas bottom-up Roman Gushchin
2020-12-17 20:12 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] memblock: do not start bottom-up allocations with kernel_end Roman Gushchin
2020-12-19 14:52   ` Wonhyuk Yang
2020-12-19 14:52     ` Wonhyuk Yang
2020-12-19 17:05     ` Roman Gushchin
2020-12-20  6:49   ` Mike Rapoport
2021-01-22  4:37     ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2021-01-22  4:37       ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2021-01-24  2:09       ` Andrew Morton
2021-01-24  2:09         ` Andrew Morton
2021-01-24  7:34         ` Mike Rapoport
2021-01-24  7:34           ` Mike Rapoport
2021-01-26  0:30           ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2021-01-26  0:30             ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2021-02-08 23:58           ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2021-02-08 23:58             ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2021-02-28  4:18   ` Florian Fainelli
2021-02-28  9:00     ` Mike Rapoport
2021-02-28 18:19       ` Florian Fainelli
2021-02-28 23:08         ` Serge Semin
2021-03-01  3:50           ` Florian Fainelli
2021-03-01  3:50             ` Florian Fainelli
2021-03-01  9:22             ` Serge Semin
2021-03-01  9:22               ` Serge Semin
2021-03-02  4:09               ` Florian Fainelli
2021-03-02  4:09                 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-03-02 13:26                 ` Serge Semin
2021-03-02  4:19               ` [PATCH] MIPS: BMIPS: Reserve exception base to prevent corruption Florian Fainelli
2021-03-02  8:09                 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-03-02 13:54                 ` Serge Semin
2021-03-02 19:04                 ` Roman Gushchin
2021-03-02 23:54                 ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
2021-03-03  1:30                   ` Florian Fainelli [this message]
2021-03-03  9:41                     ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
2021-03-03 17:45                       ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2021-03-03 18:15                         ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
2021-03-03 21:50                           ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2021-03-01  9:45             ` [PATCH v2 2/2] memblock: do not start bottom-up allocations with kernel_end Mike Rapoport
2021-03-01  9:45               ` Mike Rapoport
2021-03-02  3:55               ` Roman Gushchin
2021-03-02  3:55                 ` Roman Gushchin
2021-03-02 13:08                 ` Serge Semin
2021-03-23 18:19   ` [tip: x86/boot] x86/setup: Consolidate early memory reservations tip-bot2 for Mike Rapoport
2020-12-20  6:48 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] mm: cma: allocate cma areas bottom-up Mike Rapoport
2020-12-21 17:05   ` Roman Gushchin
2020-12-23  4:06     ` Andrew Morton
2020-12-23 16:35       ` Roman Gushchin
2020-12-23 22:10         ` Mike Rapoport
2020-12-28 19:36           ` Roman Gushchin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4e3640d4-7fc2-96dc-de00-599b3ac80757@gmail.com \
    --to=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
    --cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
    --cc=fancer.lancer@gmail.com \
    --cc=guro@fb.com \
    --cc=kdasu.kdev@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@crapouillou.net \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=siyanteng@loongson.cn \
    --cc=tsbogend@alpha.franken.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.