All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
To: Zhang Qiang <qiang.zhang@windriver.com>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] workqueue: Remove unnecessary kfree() call in rcu_free_wq()
Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 10:07:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4f292007-4da0-3558-4c6b-ca3eaf884193@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200528013736.39356-1-qiang.zhang@windriver.com>

> Thus delete this function call which became unnecessary with the referenced
> software update.
…
> Co-developed-by: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>

I guess that this tag should usually trigger another consequence like the following.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?id=b0c3ba31be3e45a130e13b278cf3b90f69bda6f6#n548

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>


Is there a need to tag also the patch review contribution of Lai Jiangshan?
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAJhGHyC4XcNL8yzWZKZ=73wZJej4JwCaAHGV8qjYn-AqcEAEjQ@mail.gmail.com/
https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/comment/1442889/
https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/5/26/201


I am unsure if such aspects will matter after Tejun Heo responded with the information
“Applied to wq/for-5.8.” to the previous patch version yesterday.
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200527135214.GI83516@mtj.thefacebook.com/
https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/comment/1443888/


>  v1->v2->v3->v4->v5->v6:
>  Modify weakly submitted information and tag.

I am curious how our imaginations and preferences will evolve further
also for such wording selections.

Regards,
Markus

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
To: Zhang Qiang <qiang.zhang@windriver.com>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] workqueue: Remove unnecessary kfree() call in rcu_free_wq()
Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 08:07:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4f292007-4da0-3558-4c6b-ca3eaf884193@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200528013736.39356-1-qiang.zhang@windriver.com>

> Thus delete this function call which became unnecessary with the referenced
> software update.
…
> Co-developed-by: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>

I guess that this tag should usually trigger another consequence like the following.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?id=b0c3ba31be3e45a130e13b278cf3b90f69bda6f6#n548

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>


Is there a need to tag also the patch review contribution of Lai Jiangshan?
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAJhGHyC4XcNL8yzWZKZ=73wZJej4JwCaAHGV8qjYn-AqcEAEjQ@mail.gmail.com/
https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/comment/1442889/
https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/5/26/201


I am unsure if such aspects will matter after Tejun Heo responded with the information
“Applied to wq/for-5.8.” to the previous patch version yesterday.
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200527135214.GI83516@mtj.thefacebook.com/
https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/comment/1443888/


>  v1->v2->v3->v4->v5->v6:
>  Modify weakly submitted information and tag.

I am curious how our imaginations and preferences will evolve further
also for such wording selections.

Regards,
Markus

  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-28  8:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-28  1:37 [PATCH v6] workqueue: Remove unnecessary kfree() call in rcu_free_wq() qiang.zhang
2020-05-28  8:07 ` Markus Elfring [this message]
2020-05-28  8:07   ` Markus Elfring

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4f292007-4da0-3558-4c6b-ca3eaf884193@web.de \
    --to=markus.elfring@web.de \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=qiang.zhang@windriver.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.