* [PATCH v4 3/4] OMAP2+: use control module mfd driver in omap_type
@ 2012-07-25 11:05 ` Konstantin Baydarov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Konstantin Baydarov @ 2012-07-25 11:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: b-cousson, kishon, santosh.shilimkar, tony, paul
Cc: balbi, amit.kucheria, linux-pm, linux-arm-kernel, linux-omap,
amit.kachhap, Eduardo Valentin
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1403 bytes --]
OMAP system control module can be probed early, then
omap_type is safe to use its APIs.
TODO: add support for other omap versions
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Konstantin Baydarov <kbaidarov@dev.rtsoft.ru>
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c | 11 ++++++-----
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c
index 40373db..8018cad 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/io.h>
+#include <linux/mfd/omap_control.h>
#include <asm/cputype.h>
@@ -43,15 +44,15 @@ int omap_type(void)
u32 val = 0;
if (cpu_is_omap24xx()) {
- val = omap_ctrl_readl(OMAP24XX_CONTROL_STATUS);
+ val = omap_control_status_read();
} else if (soc_is_am33xx()) {
- val = omap_ctrl_readl(AM33XX_CONTROL_STATUS);
+ val = omap_control_status_read();
} else if (cpu_is_omap34xx()) {
- val = omap_ctrl_readl(OMAP343X_CONTROL_STATUS);
+ val = omap_control_status_read();
} else if (cpu_is_omap44xx()) {
- val = omap_ctrl_readl(OMAP4_CTRL_MODULE_CORE_STATUS);
+ val = omap_control_status_read();
} else if (soc_is_omap54xx()) {
- val = omap_ctrl_readl(OMAP5XXX_CONTROL_STATUS);
+ val = omap_control_status_read();
val &= OMAP5_DEVICETYPE_MASK;
val >>= 6;
goto out;
--
1.7.7.6
[-- Attachment #2: Attached Message Part --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 3/4] OMAP2+: use control module mfd driver in omap_type
@ 2012-07-25 11:05 ` Konstantin Baydarov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Konstantin Baydarov @ 2012-07-25 11:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
OMAP system control module can be probed early, then
omap_type is safe to use its APIs.
TODO: add support for other omap versions
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Konstantin Baydarov <kbaidarov@dev.rtsoft.ru>
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c | 11 ++++++-----
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c
index 40373db..8018cad 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/io.h>
+#include <linux/mfd/omap_control.h>
#include <asm/cputype.h>
@@ -43,15 +44,15 @@ int omap_type(void)
u32 val = 0;
if (cpu_is_omap24xx()) {
- val = omap_ctrl_readl(OMAP24XX_CONTROL_STATUS);
+ val = omap_control_status_read();
} else if (soc_is_am33xx()) {
- val = omap_ctrl_readl(AM33XX_CONTROL_STATUS);
+ val = omap_control_status_read();
} else if (cpu_is_omap34xx()) {
- val = omap_ctrl_readl(OMAP343X_CONTROL_STATUS);
+ val = omap_control_status_read();
} else if (cpu_is_omap44xx()) {
- val = omap_ctrl_readl(OMAP4_CTRL_MODULE_CORE_STATUS);
+ val = omap_control_status_read();
} else if (soc_is_omap54xx()) {
- val = omap_ctrl_readl(OMAP5XXX_CONTROL_STATUS);
+ val = omap_control_status_read();
val &= OMAP5_DEVICETYPE_MASK;
val >>= 6;
goto out;
--
1.7.7.6
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] OMAP2+: use control module mfd driver in omap_type
2012-07-25 11:05 ` Konstantin Baydarov
@ 2012-07-25 12:39 ` Sergei Shtylyov
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Sergei Shtylyov @ 2012-07-25 12:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Konstantin Baydarov
Cc: b-cousson, kishon, santosh.shilimkar, tony, paul, amit.kucheria,
Eduardo Valentin, balbi, linux-pm, linux-omap, linux-arm-kernel,
amit.kachhap
Hello.
On 25-07-2012 15:05, Konstantin Baydarov wrote:
> OMAP system control module can be probed early, then
> omap_type is safe to use its APIs.
> TODO: add support for other omap versions
> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Baydarov <kbaidarov@dev.rtsoft.ru>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c | 11 ++++++-----
> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c
> index 40373db..8018cad 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c
[...]
> @@ -43,15 +44,15 @@ int omap_type(void)
> u32 val = 0;
>
> if (cpu_is_omap24xx()) {
> - val = omap_ctrl_readl(OMAP24XX_CONTROL_STATUS);
> + val = omap_control_status_read();
> } else if (soc_is_am33xx()) {
> - val = omap_ctrl_readl(AM33XX_CONTROL_STATUS);
> + val = omap_control_status_read();
> } else if (cpu_is_omap34xx()) {
> - val = omap_ctrl_readl(OMAP343X_CONTROL_STATUS);
> + val = omap_control_status_read();
> } else if (cpu_is_omap44xx()) {
> - val = omap_ctrl_readl(OMAP4_CTRL_MODULE_CORE_STATUS);
> + val = omap_control_status_read();
Isn't it better to merge now identical code into one *if*?
WBR, Sergei
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 3/4] OMAP2+: use control module mfd driver in omap_type
@ 2012-07-25 12:39 ` Sergei Shtylyov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Sergei Shtylyov @ 2012-07-25 12:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Hello.
On 25-07-2012 15:05, Konstantin Baydarov wrote:
> OMAP system control module can be probed early, then
> omap_type is safe to use its APIs.
> TODO: add support for other omap versions
> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Baydarov <kbaidarov@dev.rtsoft.ru>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c | 11 ++++++-----
> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c
> index 40373db..8018cad 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c
[...]
> @@ -43,15 +44,15 @@ int omap_type(void)
> u32 val = 0;
>
> if (cpu_is_omap24xx()) {
> - val = omap_ctrl_readl(OMAP24XX_CONTROL_STATUS);
> + val = omap_control_status_read();
> } else if (soc_is_am33xx()) {
> - val = omap_ctrl_readl(AM33XX_CONTROL_STATUS);
> + val = omap_control_status_read();
> } else if (cpu_is_omap34xx()) {
> - val = omap_ctrl_readl(OMAP343X_CONTROL_STATUS);
> + val = omap_control_status_read();
> } else if (cpu_is_omap44xx()) {
> - val = omap_ctrl_readl(OMAP4_CTRL_MODULE_CORE_STATUS);
> + val = omap_control_status_read();
Isn't it better to merge now identical code into one *if*?
WBR, Sergei
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] OMAP2+: use control module mfd driver in omap_type
2012-07-25 12:39 ` Sergei Shtylyov
@ 2012-07-25 12:45 ` Konstantin Baydarov
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Konstantin Baydarov @ 2012-07-25 12:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sergei Shtylyov
Cc: b-cousson, kishon, santosh.shilimkar, tony, paul, amit.kucheria,
Eduardo Valentin, balbi, linux-pm, linux-omap, linux-arm-kernel,
amit.kachhap
HI, Sergei.
On 07/25/2012 04:39 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 25-07-2012 15:05, Konstantin Baydarov wrote:
>
>> OMAP system control module can be probed early, then
>> omap_type is safe to use its APIs.
>
>> TODO: add support for other omap versions
>
>> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@ti.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Baydarov <kbaidarov@dev.rtsoft.ru>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c | 11 ++++++-----
>> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c
>> index 40373db..8018cad 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c
> [...]
>> @@ -43,15 +44,15 @@ int omap_type(void)
>> u32 val = 0;
>>
>> if (cpu_is_omap24xx()) {
>> - val = omap_ctrl_readl(OMAP24XX_CONTROL_STATUS);
>> + val = omap_control_status_read();
>> } else if (soc_is_am33xx()) {
>> - val = omap_ctrl_readl(AM33XX_CONTROL_STATUS);
>> + val = omap_control_status_read();
>> } else if (cpu_is_omap34xx()) {
>> - val = omap_ctrl_readl(OMAP343X_CONTROL_STATUS);
>> + val = omap_control_status_read();
>> } else if (cpu_is_omap44xx()) {
>> - val = omap_ctrl_readl(OMAP4_CTRL_MODULE_CORE_STATUS);
>> + val = omap_control_status_read();
>
> Isn't it better to merge now identical code into one *if*?
Good point.
>
> WBR, Sergei
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 3/4] OMAP2+: use control module mfd driver in omap_type
@ 2012-07-25 12:45 ` Konstantin Baydarov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Konstantin Baydarov @ 2012-07-25 12:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
HI, Sergei.
On 07/25/2012 04:39 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 25-07-2012 15:05, Konstantin Baydarov wrote:
>
>> OMAP system control module can be probed early, then
>> omap_type is safe to use its APIs.
>
>> TODO: add support for other omap versions
>
>> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@ti.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Baydarov <kbaidarov@dev.rtsoft.ru>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c | 11 ++++++-----
>> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c
>> index 40373db..8018cad 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c
> [...]
>> @@ -43,15 +44,15 @@ int omap_type(void)
>> u32 val = 0;
>>
>> if (cpu_is_omap24xx()) {
>> - val = omap_ctrl_readl(OMAP24XX_CONTROL_STATUS);
>> + val = omap_control_status_read();
>> } else if (soc_is_am33xx()) {
>> - val = omap_ctrl_readl(AM33XX_CONTROL_STATUS);
>> + val = omap_control_status_read();
>> } else if (cpu_is_omap34xx()) {
>> - val = omap_ctrl_readl(OMAP343X_CONTROL_STATUS);
>> + val = omap_control_status_read();
>> } else if (cpu_is_omap44xx()) {
>> - val = omap_ctrl_readl(OMAP4_CTRL_MODULE_CORE_STATUS);
>> + val = omap_control_status_read();
>
> Isn't it better to merge now identical code into one *if*?
Good point.
>
> WBR, Sergei
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-07-25 12:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-07-25 11:05 [PATCH v4 3/4] OMAP2+: use control module mfd driver in omap_type Konstantin Baydarov
2012-07-25 11:05 ` Konstantin Baydarov
2012-07-25 12:39 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2012-07-25 12:39 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2012-07-25 12:45 ` Konstantin Baydarov
2012-07-25 12:45 ` Konstantin Baydarov
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.