All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@cern.ch>
To: <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>
Subject: Re: i2c:ocores: fixes and polling mechanism
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2018 19:13:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5011687.103nMUzm2u@harkonnen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180625161303.7991-1-federico.vaga@cern.ch>

Hello,

sorry to disturb you all but after one month and a half I never received 
any comment about this patch set and I fear it ended up in a forgotten 
corner. I would like to know if someone is considering it or not.

Thanks :)

On Monday, June 25, 2018 6:13:00 PM CEST Federico Vaga wrote:
> The first two patches fix what I believe are bugs.
> 
> The third patch add a polling mechanism for those systems where
> interrupts are not available.
> 
> All these patches have been tested on a system without interrupt, this
> means that I used my third patch to validate also the other two.
> I would be nice if someone can run verify this also on other system,
> perhaps with interrupts. If you consider it a useful information, I'm not
> using devicetree for this installation.


-- 
Federico Vaga
[BE-CO-HT]



WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@cern.ch>
To: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>
Subject: Re: i2c:ocores: fixes and polling mechanism
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2018 19:13:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5011687.103nMUzm2u@harkonnen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180625161303.7991-1-federico.vaga@cern.ch>

Hello,

sorry to disturb you all but after one month and a half I never received 
any comment about this patch set and I fear it ended up in a forgotten 
corner. I would like to know if someone is considering it or not.

Thanks :)

On Monday, June 25, 2018 6:13:00 PM CEST Federico Vaga wrote:
> The first two patches fix what I believe are bugs.
> 
> The third patch add a polling mechanism for those systems where
> interrupts are not available.
> 
> All these patches have been tested on a system without interrupt, this
> means that I used my third patch to validate also the other two.
> I would be nice if someone can run verify this also on other system,
> perhaps with interrupts. If you consider it a useful information, I'm not
> using devicetree for this installation.


-- 
Federico Vaga
[BE-CO-HT]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-08-11 19:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-25 16:13 i2c:ocores: fixes and polling mechanism Federico Vaga
2018-06-25 16:13 ` Federico Vaga
2018-06-25 16:13 ` [PATCH 1/3] i2c:ocores: stop transfer on timeout Federico Vaga
2018-06-25 16:13   ` Federico Vaga
2018-10-21 14:10   ` Peter Korsgaard
2018-10-24 14:51     ` Federico Vaga
2018-10-24 14:51       ` Federico Vaga
2018-10-26 17:46       ` Peter Korsgaard
2018-10-26 17:46         ` Peter Korsgaard
2018-10-25  7:42     ` Federico Vaga
2018-10-25  7:42       ` Federico Vaga
2018-06-25 16:13 ` [PATCH 2/3] i2c:ocores: do not handle IRQ if IF is not set Federico Vaga
2018-06-25 16:13   ` Federico Vaga
2018-10-21 14:12   ` Peter Korsgaard
2018-10-29  8:53     ` Wolfram Sang
2018-10-29 14:27       ` Federico Vaga
2018-10-29 14:27         ` Federico Vaga
2018-06-25 16:13 ` [PATCH 3/3] i2c:ocores: add polling interface Federico Vaga
2018-06-25 16:13   ` Federico Vaga
2018-10-21 14:39   ` Peter Korsgaard
2018-10-24  9:51     ` Federico Vaga
2018-10-24  9:51       ` Federico Vaga
2018-10-26 17:45       ` Peter Korsgaard
2018-10-26 17:45         ` Peter Korsgaard
2018-10-29  8:50         ` Federico Vaga
2018-10-29  8:50           ` Federico Vaga
2018-10-29 13:04           ` Peter Korsgaard
2018-10-29 13:04             ` Peter Korsgaard
2018-10-29 13:11             ` Federico Vaga
2018-10-29 13:11               ` Federico Vaga
2018-10-25  7:47     ` Federico Vaga
2018-10-25  7:47       ` Federico Vaga
2018-08-11 17:13 ` Federico Vaga [this message]
2018-08-11 17:13   ` i2c:ocores: fixes and polling mechanism Federico Vaga
2018-08-12 15:34   ` Wolfram Sang
2018-08-22 16:16     ` Peter Korsgaard
2018-09-17 16:42       ` Wolfram Sang
2018-09-19  5:15         ` Peter Korsgaard
2018-09-19  6:51           ` Wolfram Sang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5011687.103nMUzm2u@harkonnen \
    --to=federico.vaga@cern.ch \
    --cc=jacmet@sunsite.dk \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.