* [PATCH][RFC] u-boot: Upgrade to upstream stable 2012.07
@ 2012-08-03 12:38 Radu Moisan
2012-08-03 12:46 ` Martin Jansa
2012-08-03 16:19 ` Wolfgang Denk
0 siblings, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Radu Moisan @ 2012-08-03 12:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-core
Building u-boot requires UBOOT_MACHINE. In the u-boot README file
building u-boot is achieved with "make NAME_config" and then
"make all". I assumend UBOOT_MACHINE to be the "NAME" part and thus,
the "_config" addition in u-boot.inc
NAME is the machine name, and choices area vailable in boards.conf,
I used for testing coreboot-x86.
For u-boot-fw-utils fw_enc.c was changed and it requires a header
file config.h which is autogenerated at config so it requires a
"make NAME_config".
Signed-off-by: Radu Moisan <radu.moisan@intel.com>
---
...ls_2012.04.01.bb => u-boot-fw-utils_2012.07.bb} | 7 ++++---
...age_2012.04.01.bb => u-boot-mkimage_2012.07.bb} | 6 +++---
meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc | 2 +-
.../{u-boot_2012.04.01.bb => u-boot_2012.07.bb} | 8 ++++----
4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
rename meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot-fw-utils_2012.04.01.bb => u-boot-fw-utils_2012.07.bb} (83%)
rename meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot-mkimage_2012.04.01.bb => u-boot-mkimage_2012.07.bb} (84%)
rename meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot_2012.04.01.bb => u-boot_2012.07.bb} (82%)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2012.04.01.bb b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2012.07.bb
similarity index 83%
rename from meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2012.04.01.bb
rename to meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2012.07.bb
index fe3422a..2fa3b71 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2012.04.01.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2012.07.bb
@@ -9,12 +9,12 @@ DEPENDS = "mtd-utils"
# make it default
DEFAULT_PREFERENCE = "-1"
-# This revision corresponds to the tag "v2012.04.01"
+# This revision corresponds to the tag "v2012.07"
# We use the revision in order to avoid having to fetch it from the
# repo during parse
-SRCREV = "415d386877df49eb051b85ef74fa59a16dc17c7d"
+SRCREV = "190649fb4309d1bc0fe7732fd0f951cb6440f935"
-PV = "v2012.04.01+git${SRCPV}"
+PV = "2012.07"
SRC_URI = "git://git.denx.de/u-boot.git;branch=master;protocol=git"
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ S = "${WORKDIR}/git"
EXTRA_OEMAKE = 'HOSTCC="${CC}"'
do_compile () {
+ oe_runmake ${UBOOT_MACHINE}_config
oe_runmake env
}
diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2012.04.01.bb b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2012.07.bb
similarity index 84%
rename from meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2012.04.01.bb
rename to meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2012.07.bb
index aa107fe..752efcb 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2012.04.01.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2012.07.bb
@@ -7,12 +7,12 @@ SECTION = "bootloader"
# make it default
DEFAULT_PREFERENCE = "-1"
-# This revision corresponds to the tag "v2012.04.01"
+# This revision corresponds to the tag "v2012.07"
# We use the revision in order to avoid having to fetch it from the
# repo during parse
-SRCREV = "415d386877df49eb051b85ef74fa59a16dc17c7d"
+SRCREV = "190649fb4309d1bc0fe7732fd0f951cb6440f935"
-PV = "v2012.04.01+git${SRCPV}"
+PV = "2012.07"
SRC_URI = "git://git.denx.de/u-boot.git;branch=master;protocol=git"
diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc
index 42bdde9..58a8192 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc
+++ b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ do_compile () {
unset LDFLAGS
unset CFLAGS
unset CPPFLAGS
- oe_runmake ${UBOOT_MACHINE}
+ oe_runmake ${UBOOT_MACHINE}_config
oe_runmake ${UBOOT_MAKE_TARGET}
}
diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2012.04.01.bb b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2012.07.bb
similarity index 82%
rename from meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2012.04.01.bb
rename to meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2012.07.bb
index c4ec50d..7ccee30 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2012.04.01.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2012.07.bb
@@ -14,13 +14,13 @@ DEFAULT_PREFERENCE = "-1"
LICENSE = "GPLv2+"
LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=1707d6db1d42237583f50183a5651ecb"
-# This revision corresponds to the tag "v2012.04.01"
+# This revision corresponds to the tag "v2012.07"
# We use the revision in order to avoid having to fetch it from the
# repo during parse
-SRCREV = "415d386877df49eb051b85ef74fa59a16dc17c7d"
+SRCREV = "190649fb4309d1bc0fe7732fd0f951cb6440f935"
-PV = "v2012.04.01+git${SRCPV}"
-PR = "r1"
+PV = "2012.07"
+PR = "r0"
SRC_URI = "git://git.denx.de/u-boot.git;branch=master;protocol=git"
--
1.7.9.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH][RFC] u-boot: Upgrade to upstream stable 2012.07
2012-08-03 12:38 [PATCH][RFC] u-boot: Upgrade to upstream stable 2012.07 Radu Moisan
@ 2012-08-03 12:46 ` Martin Jansa
2012-08-03 14:45 ` Radu Moisan
2012-08-03 16:19 ` Wolfgang Denk
1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Martin Jansa @ 2012-08-03 12:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6608 bytes --]
On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 03:38:42PM +0300, Radu Moisan wrote:
> Building u-boot requires UBOOT_MACHINE. In the u-boot README file
> building u-boot is achieved with "make NAME_config" and then
> "make all". I assumend UBOOT_MACHINE to be the "NAME" part and thus,
> the "_config" addition in u-boot.inc
> NAME is the machine name, and choices area vailable in boards.conf,
> I used for testing coreboot-x86.
From this description I don't see why _config is now appended when
probably all BSPs had it included in UBOOT_MACHINE variable before
meta-nokia/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_git.bb:UBOOT_MACHINE_nokia900 = "nokia_rx51_config"
meta-openmoko/conf/machine/om-gta04.conf:UBOOT_MACHINE = "omap3_gta04_config"
meta-openmoko/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_git.bb:UBOOT_MACHINE_om-gta04 = "omap3_gta04_config"
conf/machine/am180x-evm.conf:UBOOT_MACHINE = "da850evm_config"
conf/machine/am335x-evm.conf:UBOOT_MACHINE = "am335x_evm_config"
conf/machine/am3517-evm.conf:UBOOT_MACHINE = "am3517_evm_config"
conf/machine/am37x-evm.conf:UBOOT_MACHINE = "omap3_evm_config"
conf/machine/beagleboard.conf:UBOOT_MACHINE = "omap3_beagle_config"
conf/machine/beaglebone.conf:UBOOT_MACHINE = "am335x_evm_config"
conf/machine/hawkboard.conf:UBOOT_MACHINE = "da850_omapl138_evm_config"
conf/machine/include/davinci.inc:UBOOT_MACHINE = "davinci_dvevm_config"
conf/machine/include/ti814x.inc:UBOOT_MACHINE = "ti8148_evm_config_nand"
conf/machine/include/ti816x.inc:UBOOT_MACHINE = "ti8168_evm_config"
conf/machine/omap3-touchbook.conf:UBOOT_MACHINE = "omap3_beagle_config"
conf/machine/omap3evm.conf:UBOOT_MACHINE = "omap3_evm_config"
conf/machine/pandaboard.conf:UBOOT_MACHINE = "omap4_panda_config"
And any sensible is to append it to *MACHINE* variable as default:
recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc:UBOOT_MACHINE ?= "${MACHINE}_config"
Cheers,
>
> For u-boot-fw-utils fw_enc.c was changed and it requires a header
> file config.h which is autogenerated at config so it requires a
> "make NAME_config".
>
> Signed-off-by: Radu Moisan <radu.moisan@intel.com>
> ---
> ...ls_2012.04.01.bb => u-boot-fw-utils_2012.07.bb} | 7 ++++---
> ...age_2012.04.01.bb => u-boot-mkimage_2012.07.bb} | 6 +++---
> meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc | 2 +-
> .../{u-boot_2012.04.01.bb => u-boot_2012.07.bb} | 8 ++++----
> 4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> rename meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot-fw-utils_2012.04.01.bb => u-boot-fw-utils_2012.07.bb} (83%)
> rename meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot-mkimage_2012.04.01.bb => u-boot-mkimage_2012.07.bb} (84%)
> rename meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot_2012.04.01.bb => u-boot_2012.07.bb} (82%)
>
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2012.04.01.bb b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2012.07.bb
> similarity index 83%
> rename from meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2012.04.01.bb
> rename to meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2012.07.bb
> index fe3422a..2fa3b71 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2012.04.01.bb
> +++ b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2012.07.bb
> @@ -9,12 +9,12 @@ DEPENDS = "mtd-utils"
> # make it default
> DEFAULT_PREFERENCE = "-1"
>
> -# This revision corresponds to the tag "v2012.04.01"
> +# This revision corresponds to the tag "v2012.07"
> # We use the revision in order to avoid having to fetch it from the
> # repo during parse
> -SRCREV = "415d386877df49eb051b85ef74fa59a16dc17c7d"
> +SRCREV = "190649fb4309d1bc0fe7732fd0f951cb6440f935"
>
> -PV = "v2012.04.01+git${SRCPV}"
> +PV = "2012.07"
>
> SRC_URI = "git://git.denx.de/u-boot.git;branch=master;protocol=git"
>
> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ S = "${WORKDIR}/git"
> EXTRA_OEMAKE = 'HOSTCC="${CC}"'
>
> do_compile () {
> + oe_runmake ${UBOOT_MACHINE}_config
> oe_runmake env
> }
>
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2012.04.01.bb b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2012.07.bb
> similarity index 84%
> rename from meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2012.04.01.bb
> rename to meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2012.07.bb
> index aa107fe..752efcb 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2012.04.01.bb
> +++ b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2012.07.bb
> @@ -7,12 +7,12 @@ SECTION = "bootloader"
> # make it default
> DEFAULT_PREFERENCE = "-1"
>
> -# This revision corresponds to the tag "v2012.04.01"
> +# This revision corresponds to the tag "v2012.07"
> # We use the revision in order to avoid having to fetch it from the
> # repo during parse
> -SRCREV = "415d386877df49eb051b85ef74fa59a16dc17c7d"
> +SRCREV = "190649fb4309d1bc0fe7732fd0f951cb6440f935"
>
> -PV = "v2012.04.01+git${SRCPV}"
> +PV = "2012.07"
>
> SRC_URI = "git://git.denx.de/u-boot.git;branch=master;protocol=git"
>
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc
> index 42bdde9..58a8192 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc
> +++ b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc
> @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ do_compile () {
> unset LDFLAGS
> unset CFLAGS
> unset CPPFLAGS
> - oe_runmake ${UBOOT_MACHINE}
> + oe_runmake ${UBOOT_MACHINE}_config
> oe_runmake ${UBOOT_MAKE_TARGET}
> }
>
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2012.04.01.bb b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2012.07.bb
> similarity index 82%
> rename from meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2012.04.01.bb
> rename to meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2012.07.bb
> index c4ec50d..7ccee30 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2012.04.01.bb
> +++ b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2012.07.bb
> @@ -14,13 +14,13 @@ DEFAULT_PREFERENCE = "-1"
> LICENSE = "GPLv2+"
> LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=1707d6db1d42237583f50183a5651ecb"
>
> -# This revision corresponds to the tag "v2012.04.01"
> +# This revision corresponds to the tag "v2012.07"
> # We use the revision in order to avoid having to fetch it from the
> # repo during parse
> -SRCREV = "415d386877df49eb051b85ef74fa59a16dc17c7d"
> +SRCREV = "190649fb4309d1bc0fe7732fd0f951cb6440f935"
>
> -PV = "v2012.04.01+git${SRCPV}"
> -PR = "r1"
> +PV = "2012.07"
> +PR = "r0"
>
> SRC_URI = "git://git.denx.de/u-boot.git;branch=master;protocol=git"
>
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
--
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 205 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH][RFC] u-boot: Upgrade to upstream stable 2012.07
2012-08-03 12:46 ` Martin Jansa
@ 2012-08-03 14:45 ` Radu Moisan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Radu Moisan @ 2012-08-03 14:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-core
On 08/03/2012 03:46 PM, Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 03:38:42PM +0300, Radu Moisan wrote:
>> Building u-boot requires UBOOT_MACHINE. In the u-boot README file
>> building u-boot is achieved with "make NAME_config" and then
>> "make all". I assumend UBOOT_MACHINE to be the "NAME" part and thus,
>> the "_config" addition in u-boot.inc
>> NAME is the machine name, and choices area vailable in boards.conf,
>> I used for testing coreboot-x86.
> From this description I don't see why _config is now appended when
> probably all BSPs had it included in UBOOT_MACHINE variable before
>
> meta-nokia/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_git.bb:UBOOT_MACHINE_nokia900 = "nokia_rx51_config"
> meta-openmoko/conf/machine/om-gta04.conf:UBOOT_MACHINE = "omap3_gta04_config"
> meta-openmoko/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_git.bb:UBOOT_MACHINE_om-gta04 = "omap3_gta04_config"
> conf/machine/am180x-evm.conf:UBOOT_MACHINE = "da850evm_config"
> conf/machine/am335x-evm.conf:UBOOT_MACHINE = "am335x_evm_config"
> conf/machine/am3517-evm.conf:UBOOT_MACHINE = "am3517_evm_config"
> conf/machine/am37x-evm.conf:UBOOT_MACHINE = "omap3_evm_config"
> conf/machine/beagleboard.conf:UBOOT_MACHINE = "omap3_beagle_config"
> conf/machine/beaglebone.conf:UBOOT_MACHINE = "am335x_evm_config"
> conf/machine/hawkboard.conf:UBOOT_MACHINE = "da850_omapl138_evm_config"
> conf/machine/include/davinci.inc:UBOOT_MACHINE = "davinci_dvevm_config"
> conf/machine/include/ti814x.inc:UBOOT_MACHINE = "ti8148_evm_config_nand"
> conf/machine/include/ti816x.inc:UBOOT_MACHINE = "ti8168_evm_config"
> conf/machine/omap3-touchbook.conf:UBOOT_MACHINE = "omap3_beagle_config"
> conf/machine/omap3evm.conf:UBOOT_MACHINE = "omap3_evm_config"
> conf/machine/pandaboard.conf:UBOOT_MACHINE = "omap4_panda_config"
>
> And any sensible is to append it to *MACHINE* variable as default:
> recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc:UBOOT_MACHINE ?= "${MACHINE}_config"
>
> Cheers,
Ok, missed that, I'll fix it.
radu
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH][RFC] u-boot: Upgrade to upstream stable 2012.07
2012-08-03 12:38 [PATCH][RFC] u-boot: Upgrade to upstream stable 2012.07 Radu Moisan
2012-08-03 12:46 ` Martin Jansa
@ 2012-08-03 16:19 ` Wolfgang Denk
2012-08-06 6:28 ` Radu Moisan
1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Denk @ 2012-08-03 16:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer, Radu Moisan
Dear Radu Moisan,
In message <1343997523-4117-1-git-send-email-radu.moisan@intel.com> you wrote:
> Building u-boot requires UBOOT_MACHINE. In the u-boot README file
> building u-boot is achieved with "make NAME_config" and then
> "make all". I assumend UBOOT_MACHINE to be the "NAME" part and thus,
Actually a plain
make NAME
does the same as "make NAME_config && make all".
You might also consider running "./MAKEALL NAME" instead, which
aut-adjusts to te number of available cores on the build host, so you
get somewhat reduced build times.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@denx.de
An Elephant is a mouse with an Operating System. - Knuth
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH][RFC] u-boot: Upgrade to upstream stable 2012.07
2012-08-03 16:19 ` Wolfgang Denk
@ 2012-08-06 6:28 ` Radu Moisan
2012-08-06 7:45 ` Wolfgang Denk
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Radu Moisan @ 2012-08-06 6:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wolfgang Denk; +Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
On 08/03/2012 07:19 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Radu Moisan,
>
> In message <1343997523-4117-1-git-send-email-radu.moisan@intel.com> you wrote:
>> Building u-boot requires UBOOT_MACHINE. In the u-boot README file
>> building u-boot is achieved with "make NAME_config" and then
>> "make all". I assumend UBOOT_MACHINE to be the "NAME" part and thus,
> Actually a plain
>
> make NAME
>
> does the same as "make NAME_config && make all".
>
> You might also consider running "./MAKEALL NAME" instead, which
> aut-adjusts to te number of available cores on the build host, so you
> get somewhat reduced build times.
I've tried to build this way but got into some errors and did not
pursued further in debugging them. However, because UBOOT_MACHINE is
already used as NAME_config, would be difficult to change it to NAME and
ask everyone who use it, to switch. I will go with current configuration
"make NAME_config" & "make all"
radu
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH][RFC] u-boot: Upgrade to upstream stable 2012.07
2012-08-06 6:28 ` Radu Moisan
@ 2012-08-06 7:45 ` Wolfgang Denk
2012-08-06 13:40 ` Radu Moisan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Denk @ 2012-08-06 7:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Radu Moisan; +Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
Dear Radu,
In message <501F63FF.1070401@intel.com> you wrote:
>
> > Actually a plain
> >
> > make NAME
> >
> > does the same as "make NAME_config && make all".
> >
> > You might also consider running "./MAKEALL NAME" instead, which
> > aut-adjusts to te number of available cores on the build host, so you
> > get somewhat reduced build times.
>
> I've tried to build this way but got into some errors and did not
> pursued further in debugging them. However, because UBOOT_MACHINE is
Could you please tell me exactly what these errors were? Log files
etc. highly appreciated...
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@denx.de
If programming was easy, they wouldn't need something as complicated
as a human being to do it, now would they?
- L. Wall & R. L. Schwartz, _Programming Perl_
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH][RFC] u-boot: Upgrade to upstream stable 2012.07
2012-08-06 7:45 ` Wolfgang Denk
@ 2012-08-06 13:40 ` Radu Moisan
2012-08-06 13:46 ` Wolfgang Denk
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Radu Moisan @ 2012-08-06 13:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wolfgang Denk; +Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4315 bytes --]
I may be recipe configuration, however, here are my steps:
>bitbake u-boot -c cleanall
>bitbake u-boot -c fetch
>bitbake -c devshell u-boot
in the new shell
>make coreboot-x86 (without _config)
The output I got is as follows:
Configuring for coreboot-x86 - Board: coreboot, Options:
SYS_TEXT_BASE=0xFC0000
make
/bin/bash: i386-linux-gcc: command not found
/bin/bash: i386-linux-gcc: command not found
basename: missing operand
Try `basename --help' for more information.
make[1]: Entering directory
`/home/radu/Documents/Development/yocto/build/tmp/work/qemux86-poky-linux/u-boot-2012.07-r0/git'
/bin/bash: i386-linux-gcc: command not found
basename: missing operand
Try `basename --help' for more information.
/bin/bash: i386-linux-gcc: command not found
basename: missing operand
Try `basename --help' for more information.
Generating include/autoconf.mk
/bin/bash: line 3: i386-linux-gcc: command not found
/bin/bash: i386-linux-gcc: command not found
basename: missing operand
Try `basename --help' for more information.
/bin/bash: i386-linux-gcc: command not found
basename: missing operand
Try `basename --help' for more information.
Generating include/autoconf.mk.dep
/bin/bash: line 3: i386-linux-gcc: command not found
make[1]: Leaving directory
`/home/radu/Documents/Development/yocto/build/tmp/work/qemux86-poky-linux/u-boot-2012.07-r0/git'
/bin/bash: i386-linux-gcc: command not found
/bin/bash: i386-linux-gcc: command not found
basename: missing operand
Try `basename --help' for more information.
make[1]: Entering directory
`/home/radu/Documents/Development/yocto/build/tmp/work/qemux86-poky-linux/u-boot-2012.07-r0/git'
/bin/bash: i386-linux-gcc: command not found
basename: missing operand
Try `basename --help' for more information.
/bin/bash: i386-linux-gcc: command not found
basename: missing operand
Try `basename --help' for more information.
/bin/bash: i386-linux-gcc: command not found
/bin/bash: i386-linux-ld: command not found
/bin/bash: i386-linux-gcc: command not found
basename: missing operand
Try `basename --help' for more information.
/bin/bash: i386-linux-gcc: command not found
basename: missing operand
Try `basename --help' for more information.
/bin/bash: i386-linux-gcc: command not found
basename: missing operand
Try `basename --help' for more information.
/bin/bash: i386-linux-gcc: command not found
basename: missing operand
Try `basename --help' for more information.
i386-linux-gcc -DDO_DEPS_ONLY \
-g -Os -ffunction-sections -fvisibility=hidden -D__KERNEL__
-I/home/radu/Documents/Development/yocto/build/tmp/work/qemux86-poky-linux/u-boot-2012.07-r0/git/include
-fno-builtin -ffreestanding -nostdinc -isystem -pipe
-fno-strict-aliasing -Wstrict-prototypes -mregparm=3
-fomit-frame-pointer -ffreestanding -fno-toplevel-reorder
-fno-stack-protector -fno-dwarf2-cfi-asm -DREALMODE_BASE=0x7c0
-DCONFIG_X86 -D__I386__ -march=i386 -Werror -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes
-fno-stack-protector \
-o lib/asm-offsets.s lib/asm-offsets.c -c -S
/bin/bash: i386-linux-gcc: command not found
make[1]: *** [lib/asm-offsets.s] Error 127
make[1]: Leaving directory
`/home/radu/Documents/Development/yocto/build/tmp/work/qemux86-poky-linux/u-boot-2012.07-r0/git'
make: *** [coreboot-x86] Error 2
However this is the same out as when I do
>make coreboot-x86_config
>make all
This happens only when I'm trying to build inside the devshell, which
lead me to believe that maybe the environment is not set completely,
until at do_compile.
radu
On 08/06/2012 10:45 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Radu,
>
> In message <501F63FF.1070401@intel.com> you wrote:
>>> Actually a plain
>>>
>>> make NAME
>>>
>>> does the same as "make NAME_config && make all".
>>>
>>> You might also consider running "./MAKEALL NAME" instead, which
>>> aut-adjusts to te number of available cores on the build host, so you
>>> get somewhat reduced build times.
>> I've tried to build this way but got into some errors and did not
>> pursued further in debugging them. However, because UBOOT_MACHINE is
> Could you please tell me exactly what these errors were? Log files
> etc. highly appreciated...
>
> Best regards,
>
> Wolfgang Denk
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 6181 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH][RFC] u-boot: Upgrade to upstream stable 2012.07
2012-08-06 13:40 ` Radu Moisan
@ 2012-08-06 13:46 ` Wolfgang Denk
2012-08-06 14:09 ` Radu Moisan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Denk @ 2012-08-06 13:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Radu Moisan; +Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
Dear Radu,
In message <501FC96A.8000400@intel.com> you wrote:
>
> in the new shell
>
> >make coreboot-x86 (without _config)
>
> The output I got is as follows:
>
> Configuring for coreboot-x86 - Board: coreboot, Options:
> SYS_TEXT_BASE=0xFC0000
> make
> /bin/bash: i386-linux-gcc: command not found
> /bin/bash: i386-linux-gcc: command not found
It seems CROSS_COMPILE is set to "i386-linux-", but i386-linux-gcc is
not anywhere in your PATH. Please check your PATH and fix it.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@denx.de
Advice is seldom welcome; and those who want it the most always like
it the least. -- Philip Earl of Chesterfield
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH][RFC] u-boot: Upgrade to upstream stable 2012.07
2012-08-06 13:46 ` Wolfgang Denk
@ 2012-08-06 14:09 ` Radu Moisan
2012-08-06 14:13 ` Wolfgang Denk
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Radu Moisan @ 2012-08-06 14:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wolfgang Denk; +Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1000 bytes --]
CROSS_COMPILE is set in EXTRA_OEMAKE which is used in oe-runmake()
within do_compile()
Running devshell is achieved in do_devshell() which is run after
do_patch() but before do_compile(), that's why in devshell CROSS_COMPILE
is not (yet) set.
I think this is the intended way for things to work, devshell usage, as
I see it, is mainly for pre-compile debugging purposes.
radu
On 08/06/2012 04:46 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Radu,
>
> In message <501FC96A.8000400@intel.com> you wrote:
>> in the new shell
>>
>> >make coreboot-x86 (without _config)
>>
>> The output I got is as follows:
>>
>> Configuring for coreboot-x86 - Board: coreboot, Options:
>> SYS_TEXT_BASE=0xFC0000
>> make
>> /bin/bash: i386-linux-gcc: command not found
>> /bin/bash: i386-linux-gcc: command not found
> It seems CROSS_COMPILE is set to "i386-linux-", but i386-linux-gcc is
> not anywhere in your PATH. Please check your PATH and fix it.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Wolfgang Denk
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1773 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH][RFC] u-boot: Upgrade to upstream stable 2012.07
2012-08-06 14:09 ` Radu Moisan
@ 2012-08-06 14:13 ` Wolfgang Denk
2012-08-07 2:58 ` Khem Raj
2012-08-07 5:50 ` Radu Moisan
0 siblings, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Denk @ 2012-08-06 14:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Radu Moisan; +Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
Dear Radu,
In message <501FD013.5040000@intel.com> you wrote:
>
> CROSS_COMPILE is set in EXTRA_OEMAKE which is used in oe-runmake()
> within do_compile()
> Running devshell is achieved in do_devshell() which is run after
> do_patch() but before do_compile(), that's why in devshell CROSS_COMPILE
> is not (yet) set.
But CROSS_COMPILE _is_ set (and apparently has the value
"i386-linux-".
The problem is that PATH is not set such that it contains any such
file as i386-linux-gcc.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@denx.de
"Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not
tried it." - Donald Knuth
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH][RFC] u-boot: Upgrade to upstream stable 2012.07
2012-08-06 14:13 ` Wolfgang Denk
@ 2012-08-07 2:58 ` Khem Raj
2012-08-07 5:50 ` Radu Moisan
1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Khem Raj @ 2012-08-07 2:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 7:13 AM, Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> wrote:
> Dear Radu,
>
> In message <501FD013.5040000@intel.com> you wrote:
>>
>> CROSS_COMPILE is set in EXTRA_OEMAKE which is used in oe-runmake()
>> within do_compile()
>> Running devshell is achieved in do_devshell() which is run after
>> do_patch() but before do_compile(), that's why in devshell CROSS_COMPILE
>> is not (yet) set.
> But CROSS_COMPILE _is_ set (and apparently has the value
> "i386-linux-".
>
> The problem is that PATH is not set such that it contains any such
> file as i386-linux-gcc.
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Wolfgang Denk
>
> --
> DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
> HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
> Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@denx.de
> "Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not
> tried it." - Donald Knuth
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Hi Wolfgang
If the fix proposed here
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-August/129828.html is
accepted into u-boot
then we wont need these glues.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH][RFC] u-boot: Upgrade to upstream stable 2012.07
2012-08-06 14:13 ` Wolfgang Denk
2012-08-07 2:58 ` Khem Raj
@ 2012-08-07 5:50 ` Radu Moisan
1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Radu Moisan @ 2012-08-07 5:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
I meant, set with the correct value. "i386-linux-" is preloaded into
CROSS_COMPILE and then at do_compile() "gcc" is appended to it.
Is there in interest, to actually build u-boot in devshell?
Radu
On 08/06/2012 05:13 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Radu,
>
> In message <501FD013.5040000@intel.com> you wrote:
>> CROSS_COMPILE is set in EXTRA_OEMAKE which is used in oe-runmake()
>> within do_compile()
>> Running devshell is achieved in do_devshell() which is run after
>> do_patch() but before do_compile(), that's why in devshell CROSS_COMPILE
>> is not (yet) set.
> But CROSS_COMPILE _is_ set (and apparently has the value
> "i386-linux-".
>
> The problem is that PATH is not set such that it contains any such
> file as i386-linux-gcc.
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Wolfgang Denk
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-08-07 6:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-08-03 12:38 [PATCH][RFC] u-boot: Upgrade to upstream stable 2012.07 Radu Moisan
2012-08-03 12:46 ` Martin Jansa
2012-08-03 14:45 ` Radu Moisan
2012-08-03 16:19 ` Wolfgang Denk
2012-08-06 6:28 ` Radu Moisan
2012-08-06 7:45 ` Wolfgang Denk
2012-08-06 13:40 ` Radu Moisan
2012-08-06 13:46 ` Wolfgang Denk
2012-08-06 14:09 ` Radu Moisan
2012-08-06 14:13 ` Wolfgang Denk
2012-08-07 2:58 ` Khem Raj
2012-08-07 5:50 ` Radu Moisan
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.