All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* No 3.5 version on www.kernel.org
@ 2012-08-06  6:48 Tino Keitel
  2012-08-06  9:29 ` Borislav Petkov
  2012-08-06 16:31 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Tino Keitel @ 2012-08-06  6:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: webmaster, linux-kernel

Hi,

when looking at http://www.kernel.org/, kernel 3.4.7 is shown as the
latest stable kernel, and 3.6-rc1 as the latest mainline kernel. The
3.5 version is not mentioned. Why is the latest stable kernel something
older than 3.5?

Regards,
Tino

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: No 3.5 version on www.kernel.org
  2012-08-06  6:48 No 3.5 version on www.kernel.org Tino Keitel
@ 2012-08-06  9:29 ` Borislav Petkov
  2012-08-06 16:31 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Borislav Petkov @ 2012-08-06  9:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: webmaster, linux-kernel; +Cc: ftpadmin

On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 08:48:56AM +0200, Tino Keitel wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> when looking at http://www.kernel.org/, kernel 3.4.7 is shown as the
> latest stable kernel, and 3.6-rc1 as the latest mainline kernel. The
> 3.5 version is not mentioned. Why is the latest stable kernel something
> older than 3.5?

Someone already asked this. Let's cc one more party (although
webmaster@.. could be going to the same people :-)).

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: No 3.5 version on www.kernel.org
  2012-08-06  6:48 No 3.5 version on www.kernel.org Tino Keitel
  2012-08-06  9:29 ` Borislav Petkov
@ 2012-08-06 16:31 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Konstantin Ryabitsev @ 2012-08-06 16:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ftpadmin, linux-kernel

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 789 bytes --]

On 05/08/12 11:48 PM, Tino Keitel wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> when looking at http://www.kernel.org/, kernel 3.4.7 is shown as the
> latest stable kernel, and 3.6-rc1 as the latest mainline kernel. The
> 3.5 version is not mentioned. Why is the latest stable kernel something
> older than 3.5?

Hi, Tino:

That's due to the way our script currently figures out what needs to go
to the front page. If I understand the code correctly, since there are
no 3.5.x releases, the script goes straight to 3.6-rc and 3.5 doesn't
get mentioned. Let's call that a "feature" until we have a fix. :)

You can, of course, still get 3.5 from
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/

Best,
-- 
Konstantin Ryabitsev
Systems Administrator
Linux Foundation, kernel.org
Montréal, Québec


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 729 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2012-08-06 16:31 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-08-06  6:48 No 3.5 version on www.kernel.org Tino Keitel
2012-08-06  9:29 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-08-06 16:31 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.