From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
To: Navid Emamdoost <navid.emamdoost@gmail.com>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Navid Emamdoost <emamd001@umn.edu>, Kangjie Lu <kjlu@umn.edu>,
Stephen McCamant <smccaman@umn.edu>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: unittest: fix memory leak in unittest_data_add
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2019 16:34:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50421413-f535-a608-fa7d-1b337eeb95e5@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191004185847.14074-1-navid.emamdoost@gmail.com>
> In unittest_data_add, a copy buffer is created via kmemdup. This buffer
> is leaked if of_fdt_unflatten_tree fails. The release for the
> unittest_data buffer is added.
Can a wording like the following be nicer for the change description?
The buffer “__dtb_testcases_begin” will be duplicated to the local
variable “unittest_data”. Release the corresponding memory
after a call of the function “of_fdt_unflatten_tree” failed
in the implementation of the function “unittest_data_add”.
Regards,
Markus
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
To: Navid Emamdoost <navid.emamdoost@gmail.com>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Navid Emamdoost <emamd001@umn.edu>, Kangjie Lu <kjlu@umn.edu>,
Stephen McCamant <smccaman@umn.edu>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: unittest: fix memory leak in unittest_data_add
Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2019 14:34:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50421413-f535-a608-fa7d-1b337eeb95e5@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191004185847.14074-1-navid.emamdoost@gmail.com>
> In unittest_data_add, a copy buffer is created via kmemdup. This buffer
> is leaked if of_fdt_unflatten_tree fails. The release for the
> unittest_data buffer is added.
Can a wording like the following be nicer for the change description?
The buffer “__dtb_testcases_begin” will be duplicated to the local
variable “unittest_data”. Release the corresponding memory
after a call of the function “of_fdt_unflatten_tree” failed
in the implementation of the function “unittest_data_add”.
Regards,
Markus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-05 14:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-04 18:58 [PATCH] of: unittest: fix memory leak in unittest_data_add Navid Emamdoost
2019-10-04 18:58 ` Navid Emamdoost
2019-10-05 14:34 ` Markus Elfring [this message]
2019-10-05 14:34 ` Markus Elfring
2019-10-15 19:41 ` Rob Herring
2019-10-17 17:51 ` Frank Rowand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50421413-f535-a608-fa7d-1b337eeb95e5@web.de \
--to=markus.elfring@web.de \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=emamd001@umn.edu \
--cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kjlu@umn.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=navid.emamdoost@gmail.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=smccaman@umn.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.