All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Waiman Long <llong@redhat.com>
To: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Cgroups <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>, Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>,
	Alex Shi <alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Chris Down <chris@chrisdown.name>,
	Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>,
	Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>,
	Masayoshi Mizuma <msys.mizuma@gmail.com>,
	Xing Zhengjun <zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] mm/memcg: Optimize user context object stock access
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 21:03:00 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <507e199e-963c-b7e2-958a-6cc61b55ca5d@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALvZod6_dOKfnhprpzoFNmC2cLu1F35dNZvnu-DHTNOxYmeq2g@mail.gmail.com>

On 4/12/21 7:10 PM, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 3:55 PM Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Most kmem_cache_alloc() calls are from user context. With instrumentation
>> enabled, the measured amount of kmem_cache_alloc() calls from non-task
>> context was about 0.01% of the total.
>>
>> The irq disable/enable sequence used in this case to access content
>> from object stock is slow.  To optimize for user context access, there
>> are now two object stocks for task context and interrupt context access
>> respectively.
>>
>> The task context object stock can be accessed after disabling preemption
>> which is cheap in non-preempt kernel. The interrupt context object stock
>> can only be accessed after disabling interrupt. User context code can
>> access interrupt object stock, but not vice versa.
>>
>> The mod_objcg_state() function is also modified to make sure that memcg
>> and lruvec stat updates are done with interrupted disabled.
>>
>> The downside of this change is that there are more data stored in local
>> object stocks and not reflected in the charge counter and the vmstat
>> arrays.  However, this is a small price to pay for better performance.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
>> Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
>> ---
>>   mm/memcontrol.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>>   1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
>> index 69f728383efe..29f2df76644a 100644
>> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
>> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
>> @@ -2229,7 +2229,8 @@ struct obj_stock {
>>   struct memcg_stock_pcp {
>>          struct mem_cgroup *cached; /* this never be root cgroup */
>>          unsigned int nr_pages;
>> -       struct obj_stock obj;
>> +       struct obj_stock task_obj;
>> +       struct obj_stock irq_obj;
>>
>>          struct work_struct work;
>>          unsigned long flags;
>> @@ -2254,11 +2255,48 @@ static bool obj_stock_flush_required(struct memcg_stock_pcp *stock,
>>   }
>>   #endif
>>
>> +/*
>> + * Most kmem_cache_alloc() calls are from user context. The irq disable/enable
>> + * sequence used in this case to access content from object stock is slow.
>> + * To optimize for user context access, there are now two object stocks for
>> + * task context and interrupt context access respectively.
>> + *
>> + * The task context object stock can be accessed by disabling preemption only
>> + * which is cheap in non-preempt kernel. The interrupt context object stock
>> + * can only be accessed after disabling interrupt. User context code can
>> + * access interrupt object stock, but not vice versa.
>> + */
>>   static inline struct obj_stock *current_obj_stock(void)
>>   {
>>          struct memcg_stock_pcp *stock = this_cpu_ptr(&memcg_stock);
>>
>> -       return &stock->obj;
>> +       return in_task() ? &stock->task_obj : &stock->irq_obj;
>> +}
>> +
>> +#define get_obj_stock(flags)                           \
>> +({                                                     \
>> +       struct memcg_stock_pcp *stock;                  \
>> +       struct obj_stock *obj_stock;                    \
>> +                                                       \
>> +       if (in_task()) {                                \
>> +               preempt_disable();                      \
>> +               (flags) = -1L;                          \
>> +               stock = this_cpu_ptr(&memcg_stock);     \
> The above line was missing in the previous version.
>
>> +               obj_stock = &stock->task_obj;           \
>> +       } else {                                        \
>> +               local_irq_save(flags);                  \
>> +               stock = this_cpu_ptr(&memcg_stock);     \
>> +               obj_stock = &stock->irq_obj;            \
>> +       }                                               \
>> +       obj_stock;                                      \
>> +})
>> +
>> +static inline void put_obj_stock(unsigned long flags)
>> +{
>> +       if (flags == -1L)
>> +               preempt_enable();
>> +       else
>> +               local_irq_restore(flags);
>>   }
>>
>>   /**
>> @@ -2327,7 +2365,9 @@ static void drain_local_stock(struct work_struct *dummy)
>>          local_irq_save(flags);
>>
>>          stock = this_cpu_ptr(&memcg_stock);
>> -       drain_obj_stock(&stock->obj);
>> +       drain_obj_stock(&stock->irq_obj);
>> +       if (in_task())
>> +               drain_obj_stock(&stock->task_obj);
>>          drain_stock(stock);
>>          clear_bit(FLUSHING_CACHED_CHARGE, &stock->flags);
>>
>> @@ -3183,7 +3223,7 @@ static inline void mod_objcg_state(struct obj_cgroup *objcg,
>>          memcg = obj_cgroup_memcg(objcg);
>>          if (pgdat)
>>                  lruvec = mem_cgroup_lruvec(memcg, pgdat);
>> -       __mod_memcg_lruvec_state(memcg, lruvec, idx, nr);
>> +       mod_memcg_lruvec_state(memcg, lruvec, idx, nr);
>>          rcu_read_unlock();
>>   }
>>
>> @@ -3193,7 +3233,7 @@ static bool consume_obj_stock(struct obj_cgroup *objcg, unsigned int nr_bytes)
>>          unsigned long flags;
>>          bool ret = false;
>>
>> -       local_irq_save(flags);
>> +       stock = get_obj_stock(flags);
>>
>>          stock = current_obj_stock();
> The above is redundant.

Right. I should check the patch carefully. Will remove it.

Thanks,
Longman



WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Waiman Long <llong-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	Vladimir Davydov
	<vdavydov.dev-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	Andrew Morton
	<akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl-vYTEC60ixJUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim-Hm3cg6mZ9cc@public.gmane.org>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>,
	Roman Gushchin <guro-b10kYP2dOMg@public.gmane.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	Cgroups <cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	Linux MM <linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>,
	Muchun Song <songmuchun-EC8Uxl6Npydl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>,
	Alex Shi
	<alex.shi-KPsoFbNs7GizrGE5bRqYAgC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org>,
	Chris Down <chris-6Bi1550iOqEnzZ6mRAm98g@public.gmane.org>,
	Yafang Shao <laoar.shao-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	Wei Yang
	<richard.weiyang-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	Masayoshi Mizuma
	<msys.mizuma-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	Xing Zhengjun <zhengjun.xing@linu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] mm/memcg: Optimize user context object stock access
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 21:03:00 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <507e199e-963c-b7e2-958a-6cc61b55ca5d@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALvZod6_dOKfnhprpzoFNmC2cLu1F35dNZvnu-DHTNOxYmeq2g-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>

On 4/12/21 7:10 PM, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 3:55 PM Waiman Long <longman-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> Most kmem_cache_alloc() calls are from user context. With instrumentation
>> enabled, the measured amount of kmem_cache_alloc() calls from non-task
>> context was about 0.01% of the total.
>>
>> The irq disable/enable sequence used in this case to access content
>> from object stock is slow.  To optimize for user context access, there
>> are now two object stocks for task context and interrupt context access
>> respectively.
>>
>> The task context object stock can be accessed after disabling preemption
>> which is cheap in non-preempt kernel. The interrupt context object stock
>> can only be accessed after disabling interrupt. User context code can
>> access interrupt object stock, but not vice versa.
>>
>> The mod_objcg_state() function is also modified to make sure that memcg
>> and lruvec stat updates are done with interrupted disabled.
>>
>> The downside of this change is that there are more data stored in local
>> object stocks and not reflected in the charge counter and the vmstat
>> arrays.  However, this is a small price to pay for better performance.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
>> Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <guro-b10kYP2dOMg@public.gmane.org>
>> ---
>>   mm/memcontrol.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>>   1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
>> index 69f728383efe..29f2df76644a 100644
>> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
>> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
>> @@ -2229,7 +2229,8 @@ struct obj_stock {
>>   struct memcg_stock_pcp {
>>          struct mem_cgroup *cached; /* this never be root cgroup */
>>          unsigned int nr_pages;
>> -       struct obj_stock obj;
>> +       struct obj_stock task_obj;
>> +       struct obj_stock irq_obj;
>>
>>          struct work_struct work;
>>          unsigned long flags;
>> @@ -2254,11 +2255,48 @@ static bool obj_stock_flush_required(struct memcg_stock_pcp *stock,
>>   }
>>   #endif
>>
>> +/*
>> + * Most kmem_cache_alloc() calls are from user context. The irq disable/enable
>> + * sequence used in this case to access content from object stock is slow.
>> + * To optimize for user context access, there are now two object stocks for
>> + * task context and interrupt context access respectively.
>> + *
>> + * The task context object stock can be accessed by disabling preemption only
>> + * which is cheap in non-preempt kernel. The interrupt context object stock
>> + * can only be accessed after disabling interrupt. User context code can
>> + * access interrupt object stock, but not vice versa.
>> + */
>>   static inline struct obj_stock *current_obj_stock(void)
>>   {
>>          struct memcg_stock_pcp *stock = this_cpu_ptr(&memcg_stock);
>>
>> -       return &stock->obj;
>> +       return in_task() ? &stock->task_obj : &stock->irq_obj;
>> +}
>> +
>> +#define get_obj_stock(flags)                           \
>> +({                                                     \
>> +       struct memcg_stock_pcp *stock;                  \
>> +       struct obj_stock *obj_stock;                    \
>> +                                                       \
>> +       if (in_task()) {                                \
>> +               preempt_disable();                      \
>> +               (flags) = -1L;                          \
>> +               stock = this_cpu_ptr(&memcg_stock);     \
> The above line was missing in the previous version.
>
>> +               obj_stock = &stock->task_obj;           \
>> +       } else {                                        \
>> +               local_irq_save(flags);                  \
>> +               stock = this_cpu_ptr(&memcg_stock);     \
>> +               obj_stock = &stock->irq_obj;            \
>> +       }                                               \
>> +       obj_stock;                                      \
>> +})
>> +
>> +static inline void put_obj_stock(unsigned long flags)
>> +{
>> +       if (flags == -1L)
>> +               preempt_enable();
>> +       else
>> +               local_irq_restore(flags);
>>   }
>>
>>   /**
>> @@ -2327,7 +2365,9 @@ static void drain_local_stock(struct work_struct *dummy)
>>          local_irq_save(flags);
>>
>>          stock = this_cpu_ptr(&memcg_stock);
>> -       drain_obj_stock(&stock->obj);
>> +       drain_obj_stock(&stock->irq_obj);
>> +       if (in_task())
>> +               drain_obj_stock(&stock->task_obj);
>>          drain_stock(stock);
>>          clear_bit(FLUSHING_CACHED_CHARGE, &stock->flags);
>>
>> @@ -3183,7 +3223,7 @@ static inline void mod_objcg_state(struct obj_cgroup *objcg,
>>          memcg = obj_cgroup_memcg(objcg);
>>          if (pgdat)
>>                  lruvec = mem_cgroup_lruvec(memcg, pgdat);
>> -       __mod_memcg_lruvec_state(memcg, lruvec, idx, nr);
>> +       mod_memcg_lruvec_state(memcg, lruvec, idx, nr);
>>          rcu_read_unlock();
>>   }
>>
>> @@ -3193,7 +3233,7 @@ static bool consume_obj_stock(struct obj_cgroup *objcg, unsigned int nr_bytes)
>>          unsigned long flags;
>>          bool ret = false;
>>
>> -       local_irq_save(flags);
>> +       stock = get_obj_stock(flags);
>>
>>          stock = current_obj_stock();
> The above is redundant.

Right. I should check the patch carefully. Will remove it.

Thanks,
Longman



  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-04-13  1:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-12 22:54 [PATCH v2 0/5] mm/memcg: Reduce kmemcache memory accounting overhead Waiman Long
2021-04-12 22:54 ` Waiman Long
2021-04-12 22:54 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] mm/memcg: Pass both memcg and lruvec to mod_memcg_lruvec_state() Waiman Long
2021-04-12 22:54   ` Waiman Long
2021-04-12 22:55 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] mm/memcg: Introduce obj_cgroup_uncharge_mod_state() Waiman Long
2021-04-12 22:55   ` Waiman Long
2021-04-12 22:55 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] mm/memcg: Cache vmstat data in percpu memcg_stock_pcp Waiman Long
2021-04-12 22:55   ` Waiman Long
2021-04-12 23:03   ` Shakeel Butt
2021-04-12 23:03     ` Shakeel Butt
2021-04-12 23:03     ` Shakeel Butt
2021-04-13 18:32   ` kernel test robot
2021-04-13 18:32     ` kernel test robot
2021-04-12 22:55 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] mm/memcg: Separate out object stock data into its own struct Waiman Long
2021-04-12 22:55   ` Waiman Long
2021-04-12 23:07   ` Shakeel Butt
2021-04-12 23:07     ` Shakeel Butt
2021-04-12 23:07     ` Shakeel Butt
2021-04-12 22:55 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] mm/memcg: Optimize user context object stock access Waiman Long
2021-04-12 22:55   ` Waiman Long
2021-04-12 23:10   ` Shakeel Butt
2021-04-12 23:10     ` Shakeel Butt
2021-04-12 23:10     ` Shakeel Butt
2021-04-12 23:14     ` Shakeel Butt
2021-04-12 23:14       ` Shakeel Butt
2021-04-12 23:14       ` Shakeel Butt
2021-04-13  1:03     ` Waiman Long [this message]
2021-04-13  1:03       ` Waiman Long

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=507e199e-963c-b7e2-958a-6cc61b55ca5d@redhat.com \
    --to=llong@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=chris@chrisdown.name \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=guro@fb.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=msys.mizuma@gmail.com \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=shakeelb@google.com \
    --cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
    --cc=zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.