From: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>,
Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ARM: ux500: Describe UART platform registering issues more accurately
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 09:27:22 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50A65B5A.2090000@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201211160936.59258.arnd@arndb.de>
On 11/16/2012 03:36 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 15 November 2012, Lee Jones wrote:
>> On Thu, 15 Nov 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>
>>> On Thursday 15 November 2012, Lee Jones wrote:
>>>> UARTs no longer require call-back information, since the reset
>>>> call-back was removed in 43b5f0d69291374f602ad8e1817f329573a59010.
>>>> The only AUXDATA dependencies remaining for UARTs are DMA settings.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>>>
>>> What is the state of the DMA binding now? We originally wanted to merge
>>> it for 3.7, but that didn't work out, so I hope we can get it done for
>>> 3.8.
>>
>> It's dead. The conversation has been stale for weeks.
>>
>> Perhaps you'd like to go and poke it? :)
>>
>
> Vinod,
>
> is there anything you are waiting for still? Should Jon resend
> his latest patches to make sure we get them merged this time?
>
> I have multiple people that want to send me patches for 3.8 based
> on that work, so we are running out of time now.
Vinod responded today saying it will be in for v3.8 [1].
Jon
[1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.omap/89502
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: jon-hunter@ti.com (Jon Hunter)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] ARM: ux500: Describe UART platform registering issues more accurately
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 09:27:22 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50A65B5A.2090000@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201211160936.59258.arnd@arndb.de>
On 11/16/2012 03:36 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 15 November 2012, Lee Jones wrote:
>> On Thu, 15 Nov 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>
>>> On Thursday 15 November 2012, Lee Jones wrote:
>>>> UARTs no longer require call-back information, since the reset
>>>> call-back was removed in 43b5f0d69291374f602ad8e1817f329573a59010.
>>>> The only AUXDATA dependencies remaining for UARTs are DMA settings.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>>>
>>> What is the state of the DMA binding now? We originally wanted to merge
>>> it for 3.7, but that didn't work out, so I hope we can get it done for
>>> 3.8.
>>
>> It's dead. The conversation has been stale for weeks.
>>
>> Perhaps you'd like to go and poke it? :)
>>
>
> Vinod,
>
> is there anything you are waiting for still? Should Jon resend
> his latest patches to make sure we get them merged this time?
>
> I have multiple people that want to send me patches for 3.8 based
> on that work, so we are running out of time now.
Vinod responded today saying it will be in for v3.8 [1].
Jon
[1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.omap/89502
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-16 15:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-15 8:33 [PATCH 1/1] ARM: ux500: Describe UART platform registering issues more accurately Lee Jones
2012-11-15 8:33 ` Lee Jones
2012-11-15 12:23 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-11-15 12:23 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-11-15 12:33 ` Lee Jones
2012-11-15 12:33 ` Lee Jones
2012-11-16 9:36 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-11-16 9:36 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-11-16 15:27 ` Jon Hunter [this message]
2012-11-16 15:27 ` Jon Hunter
2012-11-16 15:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-11-16 15:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-11-16 15:39 ` Koul, Vinod
2012-11-16 15:39 ` Koul, Vinod
2012-11-15 17:28 ` Linus Walleij
2012-11-15 17:28 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50A65B5A.2090000@ti.com \
--to=jon-hunter@ti.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@stericsson.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vinod.koul@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.