* parsing in the ceph osd subsystem @ 2012-11-29 7:45 Andrey Korolyov 2012-11-29 7:53 ` Gregory Farnum 2012-11-29 16:34 ` Sage Weil 0 siblings, 2 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Andrey Korolyov @ 2012-11-29 7:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ceph-devel $ ceph osd down - osd.0 is already down $ ceph osd down --- osd.0 is already down the same for ``+'', ``/'', ``%'' and so - I think that for osd subsys ceph cli should explicitly work only with positive integers plus zero, refusing all other input. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: parsing in the ceph osd subsystem 2012-11-29 7:45 parsing in the ceph osd subsystem Andrey Korolyov @ 2012-11-29 7:53 ` Gregory Farnum 2012-11-29 16:34 ` Sage Weil 1 sibling, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Gregory Farnum @ 2012-11-29 7:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrey Korolyov; +Cc: ceph-devel On Wednesday, November 28, 2012 at 11:45 PM, Andrey Korolyov wrote: > $ ceph osd down - > osd.0 is already down > $ ceph osd down --- > osd.0 is already down > > the same for ``+'', ``/'', ``%'' and so - I think that for osd subsys > ceph cli should explicitly work only with positive integers plus zero, > refusing all other input. Yes indeed! This is already fixed in bobtail (and v0.54, maybe?), and I believe Joao went through and audited all our input parsing pretty carefully. Certainly things are much better than they were. -Greg ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: parsing in the ceph osd subsystem 2012-11-29 7:45 parsing in the ceph osd subsystem Andrey Korolyov 2012-11-29 7:53 ` Gregory Farnum @ 2012-11-29 16:34 ` Sage Weil 2012-11-29 16:49 ` Joao Eduardo Luis 2012-11-29 19:01 ` Andrey Korolyov 1 sibling, 2 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Sage Weil @ 2012-11-29 16:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrey Korolyov; +Cc: ceph-devel On Thu, 29 Nov 2012, Andrey Korolyov wrote: > $ ceph osd down - > osd.0 is already down > $ ceph osd down --- > osd.0 is already down > > the same for ``+'', ``/'', ``%'' and so - I think that for osd subsys > ceph cli should explicitly work only with positive integers plus zero, > refusing all other input. which branch is this? this parsing is cleaned u pin the latest next/master. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: parsing in the ceph osd subsystem 2012-11-29 16:34 ` Sage Weil @ 2012-11-29 16:49 ` Joao Eduardo Luis 2012-11-29 19:01 ` Andrey Korolyov 1 sibling, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Joao Eduardo Luis @ 2012-11-29 16:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sage Weil; +Cc: Andrey Korolyov, ceph-devel On 11/29/2012 04:34 PM, Sage Weil wrote: > On Thu, 29 Nov 2012, Andrey Korolyov wrote: >> $ ceph osd down - >> osd.0 is already down >> $ ceph osd down --- >> osd.0 is already down >> >> the same for ``+'', ``/'', ``%'' and so - I think that for osd subsys >> ceph cli should explicitly work only with positive integers plus zero, >> refusing all other input. > > which branch is this? this parsing is cleaned u pin the latest > next/master. I confirm this is fixed, but while making sure noticed that 'ceph osd create <garbage>' will create an osd nonetheless. Just added a fix for this to wip-mon-osd-create-fix that will make sure that if the uuid argument is specified, then -EINVAL is returned in case the uuid is invalid. -Joao ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: parsing in the ceph osd subsystem 2012-11-29 16:34 ` Sage Weil 2012-11-29 16:49 ` Joao Eduardo Luis @ 2012-11-29 19:01 ` Andrey Korolyov 2012-11-29 19:49 ` Joao Eduardo Luis 2012-11-30 1:04 ` Joao Eduardo Luis 1 sibling, 2 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Andrey Korolyov @ 2012-11-29 19:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sage Weil; +Cc: ceph-devel On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 8:34 PM, Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com> wrote: > On Thu, 29 Nov 2012, Andrey Korolyov wrote: >> $ ceph osd down - >> osd.0 is already down >> $ ceph osd down --- >> osd.0 is already down >> >> the same for ``+'', ``/'', ``%'' and so - I think that for osd subsys >> ceph cli should explicitly work only with positive integers plus zero, >> refusing all other input. > > which branch is this? this parsing is cleaned u pin the latest > next/master. > > It was produced by 0.54-tag. I have built dd3a24a647d0b0f1153cf1b102ed1f51d51be2f2 today and problem has gone(except parsing ``-0'' as 0 and 00000/0000001 as 0 and 1 correspondingly). > >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> >> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: parsing in the ceph osd subsystem 2012-11-29 19:01 ` Andrey Korolyov @ 2012-11-29 19:49 ` Joao Eduardo Luis 2012-11-30 1:04 ` Joao Eduardo Luis 1 sibling, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Joao Eduardo Luis @ 2012-11-29 19:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrey Korolyov; +Cc: Sage Weil, ceph-devel On 11/29/2012 07:01 PM, Andrey Korolyov wrote: > On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 8:34 PM, Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com> wrote: >> On Thu, 29 Nov 2012, Andrey Korolyov wrote: >>> $ ceph osd down - >>> osd.0 is already down >>> $ ceph osd down --- >>> osd.0 is already down >>> >>> the same for ``+'', ``/'', ``%'' and so - I think that for osd subsys >>> ceph cli should explicitly work only with positive integers plus zero, >>> refusing all other input. >> >> which branch is this? this parsing is cleaned u pin the latest >> next/master. >> >> > > It was produced by 0.54-tag. I have built > dd3a24a647d0b0f1153cf1b102ed1f51d51be2f2 today and problem has > gone(except parsing ``-0'' as 0 and 00000/0000001 as 0 and 1 > correspondingly). We use strtol() to parse numeric values, and '-0', '00000' or '00001' are valid numeric values. I suppose we could enforce the argument to be numeric only, hence getting rid of '-0' and enforce stricter checks on the parameters to rule out valid numeric values that look funny, which in the '0*\d' cases it should be fairly simple. -Joao ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: parsing in the ceph osd subsystem 2012-11-29 19:01 ` Andrey Korolyov 2012-11-29 19:49 ` Joao Eduardo Luis @ 2012-11-30 1:04 ` Joao Eduardo Luis [not found] ` <1354237947.86472.YahooMailNeo@web121901.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> 1 sibling, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Joao Eduardo Luis @ 2012-11-30 1:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrey Korolyov; +Cc: Sage Weil, ceph-devel On 11/29/2012 07:01 PM, Andrey Korolyov wrote: > On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 8:34 PM, Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com> wrote: >> On Thu, 29 Nov 2012, Andrey Korolyov wrote: >>> $ ceph osd down - >>> osd.0 is already down >>> $ ceph osd down --- >>> osd.0 is already down >>> >>> the same for ``+'', ``/'', ``%'' and so - I think that for osd subsys >>> ceph cli should explicitly work only with positive integers plus zero, >>> refusing all other input. >> >> which branch is this? this parsing is cleaned u pin the latest >> next/master. >> >> > > It was produced by 0.54-tag. I have built > dd3a24a647d0b0f1153cf1b102ed1f51d51be2f2 today and problem has > gone(except parsing ``-0'' as 0 and 00000/0000001 as 0 and 1 > correspondingly). A fix for the signed parameter has been pushed to next. However, after consideration, when it comes to the '0+\d' parameters, that kind of input was considered valid; Greg put it best on IRC, and I quote: <gregaf> joao: not sure we want to prevent "01" from parsing as 1, I suspect some people with large clusters will find that useful so they can conflate the name and ID while keeping everything three digits Hope this makes sense to you. -Joao ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <1354237947.86472.YahooMailNeo@web121901.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>]
* What is the new command to add osd to the crushmap to enable it to receive data [not found] ` <1354237947.86472.YahooMailNeo@web121901.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> @ 2012-11-30 1:22 ` Isaac Otsiabah 2012-11-30 1:54 ` Joao Eduardo Luis [not found] ` <1357591756.80653.YahooMailNeo@web121903.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> 0 siblings, 2 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Isaac Otsiabah @ 2012-11-30 1:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ceph-devel This command below which adds a new to the crushmap to enable it to receive data has changed and does not work anymore. ceph osd crush set {id} {name} Please, what is the new command to add a new osd to the crushmap to enable it to receive data? Isaac ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: What is the new command to add osd to the crushmap to enable it to receive data 2012-11-30 1:22 ` What is the new command to add osd to the crushmap to enable it to receive data Isaac Otsiabah @ 2012-11-30 1:54 ` Joao Eduardo Luis [not found] ` <1357591756.80653.YahooMailNeo@web121903.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> 1 sibling, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Joao Eduardo Luis @ 2012-11-30 1:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Isaac Otsiabah; +Cc: ceph-devel On 11/30/2012 01:22 AM, Isaac Otsiabah wrote: > This command below which adds a new to the crushmap to enable it to receive data has changed and does not work anymore. > > > ceph osd crush set {id} {name} > > > Please, what is the new command to add a new osd to the crushmap to enable it to receive data? You must specify a weight and a location. For instance, ceph osd crush set 0 osd.0 1.0 root=default Also, you can check up on the docs for more infos. From the docs at [1]: Add the OSD to the CRUSH map so that it can begin receiving data. You may also decompile the CRUSH map, add the OSD to the device list, add the host as a bucket (if it’s not already in the CRUSH map), add the device as an item in the host, assign it a weight, recompile it and set it. See Add/Move an OSD for details. ceph osd crush set {id} {name} {weight} pool={pool-name} [{bucket-type}={bucket-name} ...] [1] http://ceph.com/docs/master/rados/operations/add-or-rm-osds/ -Joao -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <1357591756.80653.YahooMailNeo@web121903.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>]
* osd down (for 2 about 2 minutes) error after adding a new host to my cluster [not found] ` <1357591756.80653.YahooMailNeo@web121903.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> @ 2013-01-07 21:00 ` Isaac Otsiabah 2013-01-07 21:27 ` Gregory Farnum 0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Isaac Otsiabah @ 2013-01-07 21:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ceph-devel When i add a new host (with osd's) to my existing cluster, 1 or 2 previous osd(s) goes down for about 2 minutes and then they come back up. [root@h1ct ~]# ceph osd tree # id weight type name up/down reweight -1 3 root default -3 3 rack unknownrack -2 3 host h1 0 1 osd.0 up 1 1 1 osd.1 up 1 2 1 osd.2 up 1 For example, after adding host h2 (with 3 new osd) to the above cluster and running the "ceph osd tree" command, i see this: [root@h1 ~]# ceph osd tree # id weight type name up/down reweight -1 6 root default -3 6 rack unknownrack -2 3 host h1 0 1 osd.0 up 1 1 1 osd.1 down 1 2 1 osd.2 up 1 -4 3 host h2 3 1 osd.3 up 1 4 1 osd.4 up 1 5 1 osd.5 up 1 The down osd always come back up after 2 minutes or less andi see the following error message in the respective osd log file: 2013-01-07 04:40:17.613028 7fec7f092760 1 journal _open /ceph_journal/journals/journal_2 fd 26: 1073741824 bytes, block size 4096 bytes, directio = 1, aio = 0 2013-01-07 04:40:17.613122 7fec7f092760 1 journal _open /ceph_journal/journals/journal_2 fd 26: 1073741824 bytes, block size 4096 bytes, directio = 1, aio = 0 2013-01-07 04:42:10.006533 7fec746f7710 0 -- 192.168.0.124:6808/19449 >> 192.168.1.123:6800/18287 pipe(0x7fec20000e10 sd=31 :6808 pgs=0 cs=0 l=0).accept connect_seq 0 vs existing 0 state connecting 2013-01-07 04:45:29.834341 7fec743f4710 0 -- 192.168.1.124:6808/19449 >> 192.168.1.122:6800/20072 pipe(0x7fec5402f320 sd=28 :45438 pgs=7 cs=1 l=0).fault, initiating reconnect 2013-01-07 04:45:29.835748 7fec743f4710 0 -- 192.168.1.124:6808/19449 >> 192.168.1.122:6800/20072 pipe(0x7fec5402f320 sd=28 :45439 pgs=15 cs=3 l=0).fault, initiating reconnect 2013-01-07 04:45:30.835219 7fec743f4710 0 -- 192.168.1.124:6808/19449 >> 192.168.1.122:6800/20072 pipe(0x7fec5402f320 sd=28 :45894 pgs=482 cs=903 l=0).fault, initiating reconnect 2013-01-07 04:45:30.837318 7fec743f4710 0 -- 192.168.1.124:6808/19449 >> 192.168.1.122:6800/20072 pipe(0x7fec5402f320 sd=28 :45895 pgs=483 cs=905 l=0).fault, initiating reconnect 2013-01-07 04:45:30.851984 7fec637fe710 0 log [ERR] : map e27 had wrong cluster addr (192.168.0.124:6808/19449 != my 192.168.1.124:6808/19449) Also, this only happens only when the cluster ip address and the public ip address are different for example .... .... .... [osd.0] host = g8ct public address = 192.168.0.124 cluster address = 192.168.1.124 btrfs devs = /dev/sdb .... .... but does not happen when they are the same. Any idea what may be the issue? Isaac -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: osd down (for 2 about 2 minutes) error after adding a new host to my cluster 2013-01-07 21:00 ` osd down (for 2 about 2 minutes) error after adding a new host to my cluster Isaac Otsiabah @ 2013-01-07 21:27 ` Gregory Farnum [not found] ` <1357680673.72602.YahooMailNeo@web121904.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Gregory Farnum @ 2013-01-07 21:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Isaac Otsiabah; +Cc: ceph-devel On Monday, January 7, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Isaac Otsiabah wrote: > > > When i add a new host (with osd's) to my existing cluster, 1 or 2 previous osd(s) goes down for about 2 minutes and then they come back up. > > > [root@h1ct ~]# ceph osd tree > > # id weight type name up/down reweight > -1 > 3 root default > -3 3 rack unknownrack > -2 3 host h1 > 0 1 osd.0 up 1 > 1 1 osd.1 up 1 > 2 > 1 osd.2 up 1 > > > For example, after adding host h2 (with 3 new osd) to the above cluster and running the "ceph osd tree" command, i see this: > > > [root@h1 ~]# ceph osd tree > > # id weight type name up/down reweight > -1 6 root default > -3 > 6 rack unknownrack > -2 3 host h1 > 0 1 osd.0 up 1 > 1 1 osd.1 down 1 > 2 > 1 osd.2 up 1 > -4 3 host h2 > 3 1 osd.3 up 1 > 4 1 osd.4 up > 1 > 5 1 osd.5 up 1 > > > The down osd always come back up after 2 minutes or less andi see the following error message in the respective osd log file: > 2013-01-07 04:40:17.613028 7fec7f092760 1 journal _open > /ceph_journal/journals/journal_2 fd 26: 1073741824 bytes, block size > 4096 bytes, directio = 1, aio = 0 > 2013-01-07 04:40:17.613122 > 7fec7f092760 1 journal _open /ceph_journal/journals/journal_2 fd 26: > 1073741824 bytes, block size 4096 bytes, directio = 1, aio = 0 > 2013-01-07 > 04:42:10.006533 7fec746f7710 0 -- 192.168.0.124:6808/19449 >> > 192.168.1.123:6800/18287 pipe(0x7fec20000e10 sd=31 :6808 pgs=0 cs=0 > l=0).accept connect_seq 0 vs existing 0 state connecting > 2013-01-07 > 04:45:29.834341 7fec743f4710 0 -- 192.168.1.124:6808/19449 >> > 192.168.1.122:6800/20072 pipe(0x7fec5402f320 sd=28 :45438 pgs=7 cs=1 > l=0).fault, initiating reconnect > 2013-01-07 04:45:29.835748 > 7fec743f4710 0 -- 192.168.1.124:6808/19449 >> > 192.168.1.122:6800/20072 pipe(0x7fec5402f320 sd=28 :45439 pgs=15 cs=3 > l=0).fault, initiating reconnect > 2013-01-07 04:45:30.835219 7fec743f4710 0 -- > 192.168.1.124:6808/19449 >> 192.168.1.122:6800/20072 > pipe(0x7fec5402f320 sd=28 :45894 pgs=482 cs=903 l=0).fault, initiating > reconnect > 2013-01-07 04:45:30.837318 7fec743f4710 0 -- > 192.168.1.124:6808/19449 >> 192.168.1.122:6800/20072 > pipe(0x7fec5402f320 sd=28 :45895 pgs=483 cs=905 l=0).fault, initiating > reconnect > 2013-01-07 04:45:30.851984 7fec637fe710 0 log [ERR] : map > e27 had wrong cluster addr (192.168.0.124:6808/19449 != my > 192.168.1.124:6808/19449) > > Also, this only happens only when the cluster ip address and the public ip address are different for example > .... > .... > .... > [osd.0] > host = g8ct > public address = 192.168.0.124 > cluster address = 192.168.1.124 > btrfs devs = /dev/sdb > > .... > .... > > but does not happen when they are the same. Any idea what may be the issue? > This isn't familiar to me at first glance. What version of Ceph are you using? If this is easy to reproduce, can you pastebin your ceph.conf and then add "debug ms = 1" to your global config and gather up the logs from each daemon? -Greg ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <1357680673.72602.YahooMailNeo@web121904.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>]
* Re: osd down (for 2 about 2 minutes) error after adding a new host to my cluster [not found] ` <1357680673.72602.YahooMailNeo@web121904.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> @ 2013-01-10 18:32 ` Gregory Farnum 2013-01-10 18:45 ` What is the acceptable attachment file size on the mail server? Isaac Otsiabah 0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Gregory Farnum @ 2013-01-10 18:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Isaac Otsiabah; +Cc: ceph-devel On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Isaac Otsiabah <zmoo76b@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > Hi Greg, it appears to be a timing issue because with the flag (debug ms=1) turned on, the system ran slower and became harder to fail. I ran it several times and finally got it to fail on (osd.0) using default crush map. The attached tar file contains log files for all components on g8ct plus the ceph.conf. > > I started with a 1-node cluster on host g8ct (osd.0, osd.1, osd.2) and then added host g13ct (osd.3, osd.4, osd.5) > > > > id weight type name up/down reweight > -1 6 root default > -3 6 rack unknownrack > -2 3 host g8ct > 0 1 osd.0 down 1 > 1 1 osd.1 up 1 > 2 1 osd.2 up 1 > -4 3 host g13ct > 3 1 osd.3 up 1 > 4 1 osd.4 up 1 > 5 1 osd.5 up 1 > > > > The error messages are in ceph.log and ceph-osd.0.log: > > ceph.log:2013-01-08 05:41:38.080470 osd.0 192.168.0.124:6801/25571 3 : [ERR] map e15 had wrong cluster addr (192.168.0.124:6802/25571 != my 192.168.1.124:6802/25571) > ceph-osd.0.log:2013-01-08 05:41:38.080458 7f06757fa710 0 log [ERR] : map e15 had wrong cluster addr (192.168.0.124:6802/25571 != my 192.168.1.124:6802/25571) Thanks. I had a brief look through these logs on Tuesday and want to spend more time with them because they have some odd stuff in them. It *looks* like the OSD is starting out using a single IP for both the public and cluster networks and then switching over at some point, which is...odd. Knowing more details about how your network is actually set up would be very helpful. -Greg ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* What is the acceptable attachment file size on the mail server? 2013-01-10 18:32 ` Gregory Farnum @ 2013-01-10 18:45 ` Isaac Otsiabah 2013-01-10 18:57 ` Gregory Farnum 2013-01-12 1:41 ` Yan, Zheng 0 siblings, 2 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Isaac Otsiabah @ 2013-01-10 18:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ceph-devel What is the acceptable attachment file size? because i have been trying to post a problem with an attachment greater than 1.5MG and it seems to get lost. Isaac -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: What is the acceptable attachment file size on the mail server? 2013-01-10 18:45 ` What is the acceptable attachment file size on the mail server? Isaac Otsiabah @ 2013-01-10 18:57 ` Gregory Farnum 2013-01-12 1:41 ` Yan, Zheng 1 sibling, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Gregory Farnum @ 2013-01-10 18:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Isaac Otsiabah; +Cc: ceph-devel On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Isaac Otsiabah <zmoo76b@yahoo.com> wrote: > > What is the acceptable attachment file size? because i have been trying to post a problem with an attachment greater than 1.5MG and it seems to get lost. That wouldn't be surprising; Sage suggests the FAQ (http://www.tux.org/lkml/) has an answer somewhere although I couldn't find it in a quick check. -Greg ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: What is the acceptable attachment file size on the mail server? 2013-01-10 18:45 ` What is the acceptable attachment file size on the mail server? Isaac Otsiabah 2013-01-10 18:57 ` Gregory Farnum @ 2013-01-12 1:41 ` Yan, Zheng 1 sibling, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Yan, Zheng @ 2013-01-12 1:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Isaac Otsiabah; +Cc: ceph-devel On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 2:45 AM, Isaac Otsiabah <zmoo76b@yahoo.com> wrote: > > What is the acceptable attachment file size? because i have been trying to post a problem with an attachment greater than 1.5MG and it seems to get lost. I remember that some time ago, LKML does not accept mail larger than 100k. But I don't know if that limit has changed. Yan, Zheng ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-01-12 1:46 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 15+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2012-11-29 7:45 parsing in the ceph osd subsystem Andrey Korolyov 2012-11-29 7:53 ` Gregory Farnum 2012-11-29 16:34 ` Sage Weil 2012-11-29 16:49 ` Joao Eduardo Luis 2012-11-29 19:01 ` Andrey Korolyov 2012-11-29 19:49 ` Joao Eduardo Luis 2012-11-30 1:04 ` Joao Eduardo Luis [not found] ` <1354237947.86472.YahooMailNeo@web121901.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> 2012-11-30 1:22 ` What is the new command to add osd to the crushmap to enable it to receive data Isaac Otsiabah 2012-11-30 1:54 ` Joao Eduardo Luis [not found] ` <1357591756.80653.YahooMailNeo@web121903.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> 2013-01-07 21:00 ` osd down (for 2 about 2 minutes) error after adding a new host to my cluster Isaac Otsiabah 2013-01-07 21:27 ` Gregory Farnum [not found] ` <1357680673.72602.YahooMailNeo@web121904.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> 2013-01-10 18:32 ` Gregory Farnum 2013-01-10 18:45 ` What is the acceptable attachment file size on the mail server? Isaac Otsiabah 2013-01-10 18:57 ` Gregory Farnum 2013-01-12 1:41 ` Yan, Zheng
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.