From: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com>
To: Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez <jtornosm@redhat.com>,
Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com>
Cc: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] USB: core: skip unconfiguration if device doesn't support it
Date: Thu, 5 May 2022 14:06:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50d48f9e-d7b1-a05a-5fbf-2c0461b540ef@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABk-BGt8dFKkRvFZHpJnkHyObZ2G3D102zvyEFjVYjaFVRiQdg@mail.gmail.com>
On 05.05.22 13:15, Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez wrote:
> Hello Oliver,
>
> Of course, I am working with usbip to remotize usb devices, that is
> the reason why unbind/bind is needed and with the btusb devices that I
> have, it was not working.
>
>
Hi,
sorry for being unclear. I was not referring to positive
knowledge about the devices you are testing with.
I was having dark thoughts about the other devices
they are sharing an ID with.
But Bjorn's testing has resolved that. In that case
we can indeed not penalize the compliant devices
for the broken ones.
One question, though. Your approach of simply doing
nothing if config 0 is to be selected again is a bit
brutal. Have you considered resetting the device
and stopping the reenumeration right as a config
is supposed to be chosen?
Regards
Oliver
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-05 12:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-04 8:36 [PATCH v4] USB: core: skip unconfiguration if device doesn't support it Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez
2022-05-04 12:23 ` Marcel Holtmann
2022-05-04 12:32 ` Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez
2022-05-05 10:19 ` Oliver Neukum
2022-05-05 11:15 ` Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez
2022-05-05 12:06 ` Oliver Neukum [this message]
2022-05-05 12:35 ` Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez
2022-05-05 11:29 ` Bjørn Mork
2022-05-05 14:14 ` Alan Stern
2022-05-05 15:22 ` Bjørn Mork
2022-05-05 16:48 ` Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez
2022-05-05 17:04 ` Alan Stern
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50d48f9e-d7b1-a05a-5fbf-2c0461b540ef@suse.com \
--to=oneukum@suse.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jtornosm@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.