From: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
To: Bob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com>
Cc: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <rodrigue@qca.qualcomm.com>,
Paul Stewart <pstew@google.com>,
Sujith Manoharan <sujith@msujith.org>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] ath9k: remove ath9k_rate_control
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 14:09:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <512F5709.60907@openwrt.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130228114724.GB16369@localhost>
On 2013-02-28 12:47 PM, Bob Copeland wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 04:24:49AM +0100, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>> On 2013-02-28 3:21 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> > It may not be a bad idea to keep it around as a reference and for
>> > people to do comparisons against. It just seems silly to have a rate
>> > control framework and then not use it..
>> I don't see the point in keeping that algorithm around. It has known
>> design flaws that make it perform poorly in several scenarios, and
>> fixing some of the flaws require basically rewriting it.
>
> The same could be said of PID...
I agree, we should remove that one as well.
- Felix
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-28 13:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-08 13:13 [RFC] ath9k: remove ath9k_rate_control Felix Fietkau
2013-02-08 13:30 ` Sujith Manoharan
2013-02-08 14:04 ` Felix Fietkau
2013-02-08 14:06 ` Sujith Manoharan
2013-02-08 14:08 ` Sujith Manoharan
2013-02-08 14:16 ` Felix Fietkau
2013-02-08 16:38 ` Paul Stewart
2013-02-08 16:53 ` Felix Fietkau
2013-02-27 19:20 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2013-02-28 2:21 ` Adrian Chadd
2013-02-28 3:24 ` Felix Fietkau
2013-02-28 3:54 ` Sujith Manoharan
2013-02-28 4:32 ` Felix Fietkau
2013-02-28 5:08 ` Sujith Manoharan
2013-03-01 14:31 ` Sujith Manoharan
2013-03-01 15:35 ` Ben Greear
2013-03-01 21:23 ` Adrian Chadd
2013-03-01 21:28 ` Adrian Chadd
2013-03-02 2:19 ` Sujith Manoharan
2013-03-02 5:40 ` Adrian Chadd
2013-03-02 8:26 ` Georgiewskiy Yuriy
2013-03-02 20:23 ` Felix Fietkau
2013-03-03 3:58 ` Sujith Manoharan
2013-02-28 11:47 ` Bob Copeland
2013-02-28 13:09 ` Felix Fietkau [this message]
2013-02-28 18:53 ` Adrian Chadd
2013-02-28 19:07 ` Felix Fietkau
2013-03-01 1:23 ` Sujith Manoharan
2013-03-01 10:09 ` Felix Fietkau
2013-03-01 3:53 ` Adrian Chadd
2013-03-01 10:14 ` Felix Fietkau
2013-03-01 10:22 ` Adrian Chadd
2013-03-01 10:29 ` Felix Fietkau
2013-03-01 11:18 ` Mohammed Shafi
2013-03-01 11:31 ` Felix Fietkau
2013-03-01 12:32 ` Mohammed Shafi
2013-03-01 13:05 ` Felix Fietkau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=512F5709.60907@openwrt.org \
--to=nbd@openwrt.org \
--cc=adrian@freebsd.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=me@bobcopeland.com \
--cc=pstew@google.com \
--cc=rodrigue@qca.qualcomm.com \
--cc=sujith@msujith.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.