Re: [PATCH V2 0/5] ARM: DT: tegra114: Add DT entry for different controller

[Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>]

On Tuesday 12 March 2013 03:45 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 03/09/2013 11:11 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>> This patch series add DT entry for APB DMA, I2C, UART, KBC and SPI.
>>
>> This patch series is generated on top of CCF work for T114 done by Peter
>> and hence it should be applied on top of T114 CCF patches.
>>
>> Changes from V1:
>> - Add reeason why APBDMA is not compatible with older driver
>>    in description.
>> - Remove UARTB car id correction. Make the compatible with tegra114 and
>>    older chip.
>> - Add compatible for kbc as nvidia,tegra114-kbc and nvidia,tegra20-kbc.
>>
>> Laxman Dewangan (5):
>>    ARM: DT: tegra114: add APB DMA controller DT entry
>>    ARM: DT: tegra114: Add i2c controller DT entry
>>    ARM: DT: tegra114:add aliases and DMA requestor for serial controller
>>    ARM: DT: tegra114: add KBC controller DT entry
>>    ARM: DT: tegra114: Add spi controller DT entry
> What branch is this series based on? I tried to apply these for testing,
> but git am failed to apply it to Tegra's for-3.10/dt, and Tegra's
> for-next, and my local work branch, and next-20130307.
>
> Can you please rebase onto Tegra's for-3.10/dt. Thanks.

I created the patch as:
- linux next 20130307
- Then add all clock changes from Peter's
git://nv-tegra.nvidia.com/user/pdeschrijver/linux.git

- Then I generated the DT entry on top of this which has clock reference.

In your 3.10/DT, there is no change for Peter's clock change and 
possibly this is the reason.


If I base my change on your 3.10/DT then:
- Do I need to add the clock entry for all modules also?